Comics Stan's view on the marriage

Venomaniac

Baxter Gaxton
Joined
Sep 14, 2008
Messages
137
Reaction score
0
Points
11
This is from the Stan Lee Meets hardcover edtition. In an interview with Marvel Spotlight about Stan's work, including the comics strips and the Spider-marriage.

-NOTE: This was in 2006, and the Peter-MJ breakup was merely a rumor of their seperating.

As for if this is good fro pro-marriage or anti-marriage...judge for yourself. it can be interpreted either way imo

SPOTLIGHT: The marriage of Peter Parker and Mary Jane was an event the origins of which were in your strip. What do you think about the marriage between peter and Mary Jane? What did you think about it then, when it happened, and what do you think about it now? I don't know if you're aware, but there is currently a big hubbub about perhaps splitting them up.

STAN: I think the marriage was great. I think it needed that after all those years.

SPOTLIGHT: You don't think it made Spider-Man too grown-up, or do you think it was time to do it eventually?

STAN: Well, you could be right. Maybe I should have always kept Spider-Man a teenager. In the Peanuts strip, little Charlie Brown never grew up. But maybe I was too influenced by fan mail, but I would get so much mail. "Spider-Man and Mary Jane have been dating for a million years, and when the hell are they gonna marry- and how long is he going to be in college?" and all of that. And I began to think, "Well, maybe they're right. Maybe if you keep something exactly the same, year after year, the fans will get tired of it. Maybe you need a new jolt every so often." So I remember there was one point, I took him out of high school and I put him in college. Then I had him get married. Now a million years later, they may be thinking of getting a divorce...I think probably that's the way to do it, because eventually you run out of...

SPOTLIGHT: Well, the characters lasted regardless, so perhaps it was a good idea.

STAN: Yeah. And don't forget, you're doing twelve issues a month. That's like a little movie each month, and if it's the same, each story is different- I know they're not the same, each story is different- but still, it's the same relationships month after month. Arthur Conan Doyle was able to get away with it with Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson, but he was only doing, like, a book a year, and he only did a handful of books. I think that's what happened to Superman. You know, there was a time when nobody was buying Superman comics. It was just the same thing over time. So I think they're handling it right, now.
 
Dude, c'mon... Stan changes his opinion every time the wind blows a different direction. Who knows what he believes. I have a great appreciation for him, but his public views are decided on what will bring the best publicity/sales for whatever event Marvel is currently immersed in. If he was a politician, he would be a flip-flopper. He was for the clone saga, before he was against it. He was excited by Spidey revealing his identity and then a year later when he was reminded about that event he admitted he had forgotten completely about it (kinda like the people in the Spidey books who had their memories erased). He's a great salesman, but he pretty much enthusiastically backs whatever status-quo Marvel currently has going on. If the marriage was happening at the time, he was "for it." Now who knows? I've never seen him diss a Marvel event while it was going on, no matter how hackneyed or ill concieved it might have seemed to every casual observer.
 
Dude, c'mon... Stan changes his opinion every time the wind blows a different direction. Who knows what he believes. I have a great appreciation for him, but his public views are decided on what will bring the best publicity/sales for whatever event Marvel is currently immersed in. If he was a politician, he would be a flip-flopper. He was for the clone saga, before he was against it. He was excited by Spidey revealing his identity and then a year later when he was reminded about that event he admitted he had forgotten completely about it (kinda like the people in the Spidey books who had their memories erased). He's a great salesman, but he pretty much enthusiastically backs whatever status-quo Marvel currently has going on. If the marriage was happening at the time, he was "for it." Now who knows? I've never seen him diss a Marvel event while it was going on, no matter how hackneyed or ill concieved it might have seemed to every casual observer.

I'll never forget him raving about the Punisher movie. The first one. With Dolph Lundgren.

But Stan always does these things with style, so we forgive him for it (well, I know I do...)
 
Stan also endorsed OMD/BMD storylines, even writing an afterward for the tpd & hardcover editions. Stan's a salesman, first and formost.
 
Stan may change his views, but honestly, I respect every bit of it. He's a god. :up:
 
Hey, it's his salesmanship that put Timely/Marvel on the map! Somestimes he probably takes too much credit, but I doubt Kirby, Ditko, et al could have been as successful without Stan's knack for commercialization.
 
Well, at least no matter what Stan says, it is always classy!! :yay:
 
I heard this on Spider-Man crawl space, and I don't have a link :(

I'm paraphrasing, but:

Stan was asked about his thoughts on the current status quo on a radio interview, and he pretty much admitted he wasn't crazy about what was going on with the marriage or lack thereof at the moment.
 
Stan was asked about his thoughts on the current status quo on a radio interview, and he pretty much admitted he wasn't crazy about what was going on with the marriage or lack thereof at the moment.

:wow: What a dynamic signature!! :cwink:

Get back to us when you have a direct quote. :oldrazz:
 
Out of curiousity (I'm not trying to be offensive, I honestly am curious) are you mocking me lol?


No.


...

:hehe:



(All kidding aside, you seem like a nice guy. All I'm saying is anyone can say anything without a source or quote to back it up and I just found it kinda funny you went one step further and even put that in your signature. It wasn't even a real quote from Stan, but a real quote from YOU discussing what Stan "may" or "may not" have said. I mean it's kinda meaningless. A better signature for you would be 'STAN: I think the marriage is great', because at least it's real. But I'm mostly just having fun with you )
 
Last edited:
No.


...

:hehe:



(All kidding aside, you seem like a nice guy. All I'm saying is anyone can say anything without a source or quote to back it up and I just found it kinda funny you went one step further and even put that in your signature. It wasn't even a real quote from Stan, but a real quote from YOU discussing what Stan "may" or "may not" have said. I mean it's kinda meaningless. A better signature for you would be 'STAN: I think the marriage is great', because at least it's real. But I'm mostly just having fun with you )

You have a point. I'm probabaly gonna change my sig anyway lol

btw, the radio interview apparently is down (you're not allowed to view it after a period of time, and it was in August) but I have an interview where Stan says his thoughts on OMD. It may be old news though

http://www.bleedingcool.com/2009/08/21/stan-lee-talks-spider-man-one-more-day/
 
Let's just say he is not enthusiastic with the direction and think eventually the marriage will return. But as long as he keeps getting the paycheck, he's golden.

Oh well.
 
Stan Lee said:
I didn’t know he’d unmasked himself, this is the first I’ve heard of it.

Uhh (at 2:10)



Hmm your loosing your memory Stan lol :oldrazz:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"