I didn't care for Mangold's comments really. He went after post credit scenes HARD. I think they're fun and I always enjoy waiting to see a little tease for a future movie. It adds something special to the experience that most movies don't have. And I don't care if it's basically a commercial for the next movie, because I'm already looking forward to the next one. So any little tease or extra scene is fun.
Didn't his own Wolverine film have one at the end anyway?
And I don't believe this one bit.Feige mentioned that he put end credits scenes so the audience can see and appreciate how many people put in the work to make a movie.
And I don't believe this one bit.
Worst case scenario is that you wasted a few minutes to watch a pointless scene. And it's totally optional. I can see what he's saying about how the movies need to stick the landing and have a satisfying ending. But I feel like most of the movies with end credits scenes have pretty great endings.
It reads like he targets bad movies with that trend, not the overall idea.Thank you James Mangold for your post-credits scenes opinion. I'm glad I'm not alone on that. Can't post it here because there's an f-bomb in every second word.
This is why it reads like it's aimed at bad moviesJames Mangold on end-credit scenes: It means you couldnt land your ****ing movie is what it means.
What a terrible take. I mean maybe thats true of mediocre nonsense like the first two Wolverine movies.... of which he had a hand in.
Like, that audiences are actually asking for scenes in end credits when those scenes were first developed for movies that suck, so they put something extra at the end to pick up the scores when the movie couldn't end right on its own feet.
He's not part of itDirected by.......Gavin Hood
Produced by.......Lauren Shuler Donner
. . . . . . .Ralph Winter
. . . . . . . . . . . . Hugh Jackman
. . . . . . . . . . . . John Palermo
Screenplay by....David Benioff
. . . . . . . . . . . . Skip Woods
I disagree with Mangold about being so worked up about post-credits scenes, but overall I agree. I dislike them, especially if it's a teaser for a sequel. I like when the film stands on it's own. Has a definitive ending without any "in the next episode". But there are rather innocent cases like an epilogue, i.e. shawarma scene. Fits the idea of not wanting a film to end.
Even if the end credits scenes do tease upcoming movies, its not like the movie is dependent on these credits scenes. The movie still stands on its own. The moment the credits appear, anyone in the audience has the option to leave, fulfilled that they saw the movie. If they want to watch the end credits scene, they can stay and watch it if they want to, even if it ends up being a teaser for another movie. These teasers could be done much worse. Remember the meta human file scene in BVS and the Progidum in The Mummy. There, those interrupt the flow of the movie so the studios can showcase its press kit for its upcoming movies. At least most of the MCU teases are at the end credits.
These teasers could be done much worse. Remember the meta human file scene in BVS and the Progidum in The Mummy. There, those interrupt the flow of the movie so the studios can showcase its press kit for its upcoming movies. At least, most of the MCU teases used to be at the end credits.
If you catch my drift.
I'd say it is the other way around. Two of the most blatant examples of Marvel doing it were TIH and IM2, which were two of the first films they did. They've gotten away from that more recently, with the big exception being Age of Ultron.