Herolee10
No More Miracles
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 30,204
- Reaction score
- 6,773
- Points
- 103
If Reeves is sticking to his own trilogy, that would mean the Batman of the new DCU wouldn’t show up for another 8–10 years. I don’t know… I’m not making any definitive claims, just thinking out loud here. But doing the math, that’s kind of what it looks like.
I keep wondering if The Batman could end up facing the same kind of problem The Flash had?
From what I understand, it’s not going to be part of the DCU, so it won’t connect to Superman or the rest of the upcoming films. If that’s the case, will general audiences still show up at the box office for something they know won’t be part of the bigger picture? In the case of The Flash, by the time it was released, everyone already knew the Snyderverse was dead and buried, and that was definitely one of the factors that hurt its box office.
I’m honestly happy that Superman is finally taking the spotlight, and that they’re not repeating the same mistake of rushing everything and cramming all the characters into one movie without giving them the proper build-up.
That said, I do worry about how far off the DCU’s Batman seems to be. Audiences have clearly changed in the last few years, and I can’t help but wonder if that could hurt the box office for Matt Reeves’ Batman films especially if they’re seen as completely separate from what’s happening in the DCU.
I just hope the gap doesn’t end up working against them and us.
I'm hoping that we don't have to wait until David is in his 40's before we can see him interact with the DCU Batman.