Schlosser85
Civilian
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2007
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 30,209
- Points
- 0
John Connor
and Thomas/Martha Wayne is a pretty bad comparison, considering the Waynes have basically always been dead.John Connor
I agree.I will say even though it's become old hat for most movies now,the de-aging of Hamilton and the CG of young Furlong were pretty spot on. It really could have been from the 1991 flick.
This is going to be one giant spoiler response.
James Bond is a terrible example unless you mean how many actors played the character. John Conner does not exist in the first movie except as a cameo lasting literally like 5 seconds. He had a big part of the sequels up to this point.
They changed James Bond into Jane Bond. Big whoop. They gender changed to a she and took away Skynet and replaced it with Legion. Otherwise the story is the same. And every movie since Terminator 2 is essentially the same thing. Terminators from the future and a protector come to save someone from the past. T2 did the same thing. So did T3. Salvation took place in the future and was a wash. Genisys was an abomination of Terminators 1-3.
Again, John is a MacGuffin in Terminator. He's the reason everything happens, he is not the story. Sarah is. This movie takes Sarah and refocuses it on her new adopted child.
Now if they make a sequel to this and it continues without Sarah, that still won't be a big change (see T3 and Salvation) but it might move the story forward somewhere different than before that doesn't suck.
As to "core audience fans" being exclusive to those like you who hate it? And any who actually enjoyed it are not "core audience fans"? That is your problem, not mine. I have been a fan of these movies since the first one in the 1980's. And I am going to take a guess that is longer than you have been alive.
Don't come at me with this bull**** only fans who agree with you are acceptable. You can hate it. Clearly you do. I didn't. Did I go and call you a fake fan? Did I say your opinion was worthless and held no meaning? That would only apply if you hated it for a certain reason that had absolutely nothing to do with the story.
Yep. The first film was about John without John being there. There is this inherent promise in the first two films around John, where one day he will be the leader we need him to be. It is the basis of the mythos.Well, at least you are consistent in the dismissal of pop cultural impact. I wasn't even intending to mean any fan who liked this movie didn't mattered or anything. I never once said nobody else's opinion matters, just find your take somewhat laughable is all. I'm saying, most of the core fanbase love the franchise for more than just cool action/sci-fi. The story was protecting John. He was in fact a human McGuffin but becomes much more than that. He is the savior of mankind and all, obviously his story is fairly hard to overlook.
It really renders the first two movies pointless and meaningless. They accomplished nothing.
That is, if you take anything Post-T2 as canon, which I don’t.
It is crazy. The movie I am suppose to accept as the continuation of two of my favorite films is the one that says they don't matter. What...It really renders the first two movies pointless and meaningless. They accomplished nothing.
That is, if you take anything Post-T2 as canon, which I don’t.
The premise for T3 is sound, but they lose me on the changing of Judgement Day. Well that and I just think it isn't a good movie but yeah.Eh, I don't entirely agree. In regards to DF, I agree. But in T3, yes Judgment Day happens, but John is positioned to be the man he was destined to be, which leads to the eventual defeat of the machines. So even if they don't prevent JD entirely, we still do win eventually. That's an achievement IMO. That's one area where I prefer T3
Just came back from it, it was serviceable enough. The only reasonthey killed off John is because they couldn't make a movie where they are all de-aged for 2+ hours, otherwise they would've done it. So I'm not surprised they took that route.
Yea I was thinking the same thing.They could've had
an older John Connor still alive with Sarah (Maybe even getting Edward Furlong back if they really wanted.) But they wanted to change the future leader of the resistance to be female and Mexican. To have a whole new angle on everything. A new future. Maybe because the other sequels already used an older John Connor. It could've been interesting seeing an older Edward Furlong though!
They could've made a true continuation of the story of T2 but they wanted to wipe the slate clean.