Homecoming The Amazing Spider-Man 3 General Discussion - Part 10

[Thread Manager]

This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]491531[/split]

 

[Thread Manager]

This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]491097[/split]

 

[Spider2099]

I don't know...

Civil War- May 2016
Marvel's Spider-Man- July 2016
Doctor Strange- November 2016

OR

Marvel's Spider-Man- April 2017
GOTG 2- May 2017
Thor 3- July 2017
Black Panther- November 2017

Or

GOTG 2- May 2017
Thor 3- July 2017
Marvel's Spider-Man- August 2017
Black Panther- November 2017

What do you guys think? I'm still hoping for 2016, keeps the MCU at 3 films per year. Our inner clocks say we need a Marvel film in July of 2016, we just need it.

I think July 2016 is too soon. 2017 is more realistic if the deal happens.

Civil War starts shooting April 2015 and comes out May 2016, almost a year later. If a Spider-Man movie were to come out in July 2016, then they need to start filming by May of 2015 (THIS YEAR). That leaves them less than 5 months to write a script and find a good cast before it goes into production. Not going to happen.

2017 gives them the necessary preparation for production.

 

[JOE]

I think July 2016 is too soon. 2017 is more realistic if the deal happens.

Civil War starts shooting April 2015 and comes out May 2016, almost a year later. If a Spider-Man movie were to come out in July 2016, then they need to start filming by May of 2015 (THIS YEAR). That leaves them less than 5 months to write a script and find a good cast before it goes into production. Not going to happen.

2017 gives them the necessary preparation for production.

With an overcrowded 2017 and lacking 2016. Spidey is here to balance the force.

 

[harryoscop]

I think 2017 is the most likely release date, at the earliest.

 

[Spider2099]

With an overcrowded 2017 and lacking 2016. Spidey is here to balance the force.

I don't think 2017 is too crowded. We've gotten to the point where everyone is expecting multiple comic book movies to come out per year with nearby release dates.

2016 is genuinely too soon I think unless they already have a script to work with (which I doubt).

 

[spider-neil]

2016 is too soon regardless of what direction the Spider-Man franchise goes.

 

[LEVITIKUZ]

TASM2 would have been a lot better if they went for this direction.

 

[Spider2099]

2016 is too soon regardless of what direction the Spider-Man franchise goes.

Very true. Not only is it somewhat unrealistic, but I think it's also just too soon. People need some time to process that the TASM films are no longer relevant and that this is something different. But I'm sure many will be left excited for Spider-Man in the MCU.

TASM2 would have been a lot better if they went for this direction.

 

[Marvel Spider]

I wonder what's gonna happen to Sinister Six. Will it be scrapped, or reformatted into a "soft reboot" like rumors suggested?

 

[Spider2099]

I wonder what's gonna happen to Sinister Six. Will it be scrapped, or reformatted into a "soft reboot" like rumors suggested?

If that script breakdown was real, then I think it'll be scrapped completely considering it sounds like a cluttered mess. Maybe Marvel can sort of rework it and tweak it for the MCU. Or just start from scratch.

It's also a possibility that Marvel has a draft of a Spider-Man script that they can use. Didn't they have the same thing for characters like Black Panther, Ant-Man and Dr. Strange?

 

[TheWallCrawler]

I wonder what's gonna happen to Sinister Six. Will it be scrapped, or reformatted into a "soft reboot" like rumors suggested?

If Sony continued making these movies, they would probably split TASM3 to 2 parts since it's a fad now (not that they'd have enough material to fill 2 movies), and have the Sinister Six form in the first one and attack in the second one

If Marvel gets Spider-man, he'll take the back seat for a while and appear in the Avengers movies. then after phase 3, they'd start making Spider-man solo movies, but at that point it would be too late to continue with Sinister Six straight away. So, they'd patiently take their time to introduce the concept again

 

[Spider-Gnome]

I think Marvel was making room for a Spidey film because they were in talks with Sony to incorporate him into the MCU. I think they still have hopes and it looks even more of a possibility now than it was last fall.

And to spider-neil about the webbing, Pete is established to be a science whiz and I think that, combined with the bite could explain him coming up with the formula. I mean it had him crawling walls, super acrobatics, and spider sense, it's not that much of a stretch.

 

[Spider2099]

If Marvel gets Spider-man, he'll take the back seat for a while and appear in the Avengers movies. then after phase 3, they'd start making Spider-man solo movies, but at that point it would be too late to continue with Sinister Six straight away. So, they'd patiently take their time to introduce the concept again

Actually, Marvel wants Spider-Man to start off with a solo film and then appear in the Avengers. He wouldn't be taking a backseat at all.

And to spider-neil about the webbing, Pete is established to be a science whiz and I think that, combined with the bite could explain him coming up with the formula. I mean it had him crawling walls, super acrobatics, and spider sense, it's not that much of a stretch.

They should have gone in the direction of USM in regards to the webbing. I remember in the USM comics, Peter finds Richard Parker's lab notes (just like in TASM1), and one thing he finds is a webbing formula. He follows his dad's instructions and figures out how to make the webbing from there.

In TASM1, he just buys the webbing from Oscorp like it's no big deal... he should have been caught purchasing them. And what if Oscorp stopped selling that product? Is Spider-Man going to be web-less?

 

[spider-neil]

I think Marvel was making room for a Spidey film because they were in talks with Sony to incorporate him into the MCU. I think they still have hopes and it looks even more of a possibility now than it was last fall.

And to spider-neil about the webbing, Pete is established to be a science whiz and I think that, combined with the bite could explain him coming up with the formula. I mean it had him crawling walls, super acrobatics, and spider sense, it's not that much of a stretch.

The stretch is him not wanting to get rich off his revolutionary invention.

 

[HarryOsborn]

I think Marvel was making room for a Spidey film because they were in talks with Sony to incorporate him into the MCU. I think they still have hopes and it looks even more of a possibility now than it was last fall.

And to spider-neil about the webbing, Pete is established to be a science whiz and I think that, combined with the bite could explain him coming up with the formula. I mean it had him crawling walls, super acrobatics, and spider sense, it's not that much of a stretch.

For me it's not how he creates the webbing that's hard to believe, but why. Like it just seems a bit ridiculous that a kid who gets Spider-Powers takes the Spider-Motiff so far that he builds web shooters as his primary weapon. I say the best thing the film can do is show he uses them, and just not explain how he got them or why. Sort of like how the old Batman movies never showed how Bruce got all the Batgear, he's just got it and we accept it.

 

[Spider2099]

For me it's not how he creates the webbing that's hard to believe, but why. Like it just seems a bit ridiculous that a kid who gets Spider-Powers takes the Spider-Motiff so far that he builds web shooters as his primary weapon. I say the best thing the film can do is show he uses them, and just not explain how he got them or why. Sort of like how the old Batman movies never showed how Bruce got all the Batgear, he's just got it and we accept it.

I think this explanation works very well:

[YT]P2Q8-NQ38CA[/YT]

 

[JOE]

I don't think 2017 is too crowded. We've gotten to the point where everyone is expecting multiple comic book movies to come out per year with nearby release dates.

2016 is genuinely too soon I think unless they already have a script to work with (which I doubt).

Add Justice League Part 1 and Wonder Woman to the equation, that's 5 CBM already in one year. Almost one every other month... Not that I'm complaining as a CBM fan.

If we don't see him in 2016 I don't think we'll see Spidey until Phase 4, or cameos throughout Phase 3.

 

[Eddie]

Already mentioned by someone else in the previous thread, but here's the Mayimbe tweet for those that want to see the specific words:

Umberto Gonzalez @elmayimbe · 10h 10 hours ago
.@johncampea You got the dates wrong. The irony of this is that SPIDER-MAN will "PROBABLY" meet THOR on May 4th, 2018.

I'm thinking April 2017 for Marvel's Spider-Man. April has proven to be a good blockbuster month with last year's Winter Soldier, and April 2017 isn't very crowded as of right now. November 2016 seems the soonest it could realistically happen, but I'm not sure Marvel will move Dr. Strange.

 

[spider-neil]

I think this explanation works very well:

[YT]P2Q8-NQ38CA[/YT]

Good explanation. If they put that in the movie word for word I still think they would need a line to explain why he never patented the webbing.
ASM DEFINATELY should have had a line about the webbing dissolving in an hour. Also the kid's wind turbine still had Spider-Man's webbing (that he used to fix the science project) even days later meaning there is webbing all over the city where Spider-Man swings.

 

[JOE]

I want to know where Umberto is getting this information from...

 

[JOE]

Good explanation. If they put that in the movie word for word I still think they would need a line to explain why he never patented the webbing.
ASM DEFINATELY should have had a line about the webbing dissolving in an hour. Also the kid's wind turbine still had Spider-Man's webbing (that he used to fix the science project) even days later meaning there is webbing all over the city where Spider-Man swings.

I love the 90's series, this show was my childhood.

 

[Spider2099]

Add Justice League Part 1 and Wonder Woman to the equation, that's 5 CBM already in one year. Almost one every other month... Not that I'm complaining as a CBM fan.

If we don't see him in 2016 I don't think we'll see Spidey until Phase 4, or cameos throughout Phase 3.

I disagree. 2017 is still a good year. As long as the movies are spaced out from each other by a month or so it can work. And Marvel would still want Spidey for Avengers: Infinity War in 2018. We'll see what happens anyway.

Good explanation. If they put that in the movie word for word I still think they would need a line to explain why he never patented the webbing.
ASM DEFINATELY should have had a line about the webbing dissolving in an hour. Also the kid's wind turbine still had Spider-Man's webbing (that he used to fix the science project) even days later meaning there is webbing all over the city where Spider-Man swings.

I don't think that's necessary. They don't need to explain why he didn't patent his webbing. Kids wouldn't get it. Also, I think you can just accept that if Peter patented the webbing, that would give away his identity and he probably wouldn't be able to be Spider-Man.

 

[Lord]

So, The Amazing Spider-Man film series with Andrew Garfield is getting cancelled?

 

[Spider2099]

So, The Amazing Spider-Man film series with Andrew Garfield is getting cancelled?

Hopefully.