Homecoming The Amazing Spider-Man 3 General Discussion - Part 10

[degraves93]

Given the wealth of bad ideas that have been revealed, I don't see TASM3 being any good if it did happen. Spider-Man's future is far brighter at Marvel IMO.

 

[OriginalMiles]

Let's not level London, I LIVE in London.

Sandman does what he pleases.

 

[AF3619]

I'm not evil. Professor Monster is evil.

Lol, is that the villain from the japanese show?

 

[OriginalMiles]

https://***********/Da7e/status/554699704077139969

Is that Spider-Knight?

Spider-Knight is with the angels.

 

[Eddie]

Sandman does what he pleases.

Indeed. He also doesn't like magic. **** you, magic!

 

[spider-neil]

Why?... That's just what the character needs. A breather. Certainly if they are continuing the Amazing franchise.

I hardly read Spider-Man comics any more, I'm waiting for the hardcover of Spider-Verse (months away), USM SUCKS. So my only Spider-Man fix is currently the movies, so no, I don't want to wait 3 years.

 

[Daltonio]

The irony is it earned almost no profit, making the sequel questionable even if Marvel Studios wasn't a possibility...

Seriously, guys, There's very little chance Sony isn't at least soft rebooting. They've burned bridges with Garfield and Webb, it's already been leaked that the Sinister Six lineup wasn't going to be the one set up in TASM2, and the Sony bosses aren't happy with the state of Spider-Man (worth noting: Sony is based in Japan and TASM series performed significantly lower than the Raimi series. 2 was the lowest grossing by far).

Honestly it still made money, I just think Sony's expectations were far too high. It was never going to make Avengers money no matter how good it was.

As far as I'm concerned the stuff about Garfield is still just gossip and rumors until we get an official announcement of some kind. I'm still holding onto the tiniest web-strand of hope that TASM3 will see the light of day in the near future.

 

[HanShotFirst]

Exactly. There's no reason to end the franchise now, it's earned another film imo.

Man, you're so selfish lol.

Don't worry, you'll get over it. Character is bigger than any actor and even Andrew said that in his interviews. We, pro-reboot people, are first and foremost Spider-Man fans, not Tobey Maguire or Andrew Garfield fans and we just want what's best for our good ol' web-head.

 

[LizardMan07]

Spider-Knight is with the angels.

It's your fault he got banned miles if we just invited him to the SHH6 he would have spammed us instead and he'd still be alive

 

[Eddie]

Lol, is that the villain from the japanese show?

Yes. He's the main villain. The sad thing is that Professor Monster is probably a better "Dr. Doom" than Domashev will be...

 

[OriginalMiles]

Man, you're so selfish lol.

Don't worry, you'll get over it. Character is bigger than any actor and even Andrew said that in his interviews. We, pro-reboot people, are first and foremost Spider-Man fans, not Tobey Maguire or Andrew Garfield fans and we just want what's best for our good ol' web-head.

Are you implying that people who don't want a reboot aren't Spidey fans "first and foremost"?

It's your fault he got banned miles if we just invited him to the SHH6 he would have spammed us instead and he'd still be alive

I don't regret what I did, BRAB... not one bit.

The Spider-Knight is dead.

 

[harryoscop]

I miss the Knight

 

[OriginalMiles]

I miss the Knight

You're probably the only one.

 

[LizardMan07]

Are you implying that people who don't want a reboot aren't Spidey fans "first and foremost"?



I don't regret what I did, BRAB... not one bit.

The Spider-Knight is dead.

To be fair it's his first post in a while that hasn't included the phrase "spamming quartet" so perhaps cut him some slack as he's making progress.

Spider knight if you're reading this I love you please don't die. Miles doesn't mean what he says.

Also spider knight is killing it on Twitter, over 400 followers

 

[AF3619]

Yes. He's the main villain. The sad thing is that Professor Monster is probably a better "Dr. Doom" than Domashev will be...

I'll still wait for the trailer ( if it ever releases) to start making an opinion on the FF reboot
Going back to spidey, by the day it feels less likely that we'll have TASM3 and sony will make a reboot

 

[harryoscop]

You're probably the only one.

I thought he was funny

 

[OriginalMiles]

To be fair it's his first post in a while that hasn't included the phrase "spamming quartet" so perhaps cut him some slack as he's making progress.

Spider knight if you're reading this I love you please don't die. Miles doesn't mean what he says.

Also spider knight is killing it on Twitter, over 400 followers

True, true. I'll give credit where it is due.

Spider-Knight is guarding the Holy DC of the Lord of Spiders.

 

[degraves93]

I'll still wait for the trailer ( if it ever releases) to start making an opinion on the FF reboot
Going back to spidey, by the day it feels less likely that we'll have TASM3 and sony will make a reboot

Very true. I don't see a second Sony reboot being a viable option at this point.

 

[Spider-man95]

Are you implying that people who don't want a reboot aren't Spidey fans "first and foremost"?

Spider-man would be back at home with Marvel. He would be in more competent hands that understand the character better and these people would not meddle like Sony.

How can you support a company that has treated Spider-man like a cash cow instead of an icon?

 

[Eddie]

Honestly it still made money, I just think Sony's expectations were far too high. It was never going to make Avengers money no matter how good it was.

As far as I'm concerned the stuff about Garfield is still just gossip and rumors until we get an official announcement of some kind. I'm still holding onto the tiniest web-strand of hope that TASM3 will see the light of day in the near future.

It really didn't. It made $65,000,000 before overheads. We don't know how much less that brings the total down to, but it's definitely below $65,000,000. Sony typically pulls in a 50% profit (as per the leak) and they were striving to increase that percentage. TASM2 likely didn't hit 20% profitability (I'm not very familiar with overheads, maybe it didn't even pull that off). That's pretty horrible for a franchise that relies exclusively on box office revenues and home sales (this would be a totally different conversation if Sony made money from the movie merchandise). Knowing what Spidey merchandise brings in, it's actually safe to say Disney made more from TASM2 than Sony did.

 

[Daltonio]

Are you implying that people who don't want a reboot aren't Spidey fans "first and foremost"?

I wouldn't be surprised, he wouldn't be the first one. The people who say that the ones who liked the TASM movies aren't "true Spider-Man fans" make me madder than anything else.

I've been a Spidey fan for as long as I can possibly remember, but all of a sudden people think I don't love the character just because I think it'd be a stupid decision to ditch Garfield & the TASM series.

 

[HanShotFirst]

To be fair it's his first post in a while that hasn't included the phrase "spamming quartet" so perhaps cut him some slack as he's making progress.

"You talkin' to me?"

 

[degraves93]

I wouldn't be surprised, he wouldn't be the first one. The people who say that the ones who liked the TASM movies aren't "true Spider-Man fans" make me madder than anything else.

I've been a Spidey fan for as long as I can possibly remember, but all of a sudden people think I don't love the character just because I think it'd be a stupid decision to ditch Garfield & the TASM series.

I mostly agree. I love both ASM movies to death, and it's gonna suck to see Garfield go after only two movies, that's for damn certain. However, as I've said, Sony simply doesn't seem to have any sort of direction for their own franchise. So, Spidey being at Marvel is probably the best thing in the long haul. But yeah, screw anyone who says you aren't a "true fan" if you wanna see TASM continue

 

[OriginalMiles]

Spider-man would be back at home with Marvel. He would be in more competent hands that understand the character better and these people would not meddle like Sony.

How can you support a company that has treated Spider-man like a cash cow instead of an icon?

Easy.

Because I ****ing want to.

I've already said that I want TASM3, but I would be absolutely supportive of a Marvel Spider-Man movie. Jeez.

I wouldn't be surprised, he wouldn't be the first one. The people who say that the ones who liked the TASM movies aren't "true Spider-Man fans" make me madder than anything else.

I've been a Spidey fan for as long as I can possibly remember, but all of a sudden people think I don't love the character just because I think it'd be a stupid decision to ditch Garfield & the TASM series.

Just because we think differently from them and have a different view on what's good for Spidey.

Ah well, it doesn't matter. We all have opinions, there is no right or wrong. t: t:

 

[Spider-man95]

Easy.

Because I ****ing want to.

You want to support a company that is not caring for your favorite superhero?