Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]400481[/split]
Well, the Osborns are a big part of Spider-Man's life. It's only natural to reintroduce them in the new Trilogy. And I like that Norman gets build up as that really big figure and his potential doesn't get wasted in the very first Movie. On Venom, yeah, it's probably better if a director who loves the character handles him. I would love Webb to do him, but if he doesn't want to do it, I won't force him.
Well considering he's dead I don't think that matters much.
That and Kingpin can't be used by Sony.
Yup! Hopefully Tom Jane will come back as the Punisher at some point.Did Marvel get Punisher back?
Well considering he's dead I don't think that matters much.
That and Kingpin can't be used by Sony.
Well considering he's dead I don't think that matters much.
That and Kingpin can't be used by Sony.
No fox owned DD, Sony loaned fox kingpin. Now marvel owns DDhttp://www.superherohype.com/featur...-with-the-producers-of-the-amazing-spider-man
Actually, Sony owns Daredevil. They loaned him over to Fox.
Yup! Hopefully Tom Jane will come back as the Punisher at some point.
Lol no one wants Ghost Rider
I doubt it. Marvel owns the Daredevil rights now.
Sony owns the rights of any character introduced in Spider-man comics.They own the rights to Kingpin aswell
They just loaned him to Fox for 'Daredevil'
Arad said this himself
I'm really not interested in Ghost Rider. Great in the comics, great in MVC3... After seeing him on screen though, he's one of the heroes I can't ever see being done well.
Maybe I'll be proved wrong someday.
I still have yet to watch the Ghost Rider films.