The Amazing Spider-Man The Amazing Spider-Man General Discussion & Speculation Thread - - - Part 12

Status
Not open for further replies.
Okay? Did you just want to get all of that off your chest or were you looking for some kind of discussion or argument? I don't understand the people that do this. Shame on me, I didn't read your whole post but I remember from last time. But why do you feel the need to come onto a message board where the majority of people that post there are excited for the movie and go on a rant about how you're not excited for it and that the Raimi films were better? Wouldn't this be better off in the Raimi section of the boards?

this thread is a 'discussion' for Amazing Spider-Man. I'm adding my opinion to the discussion. Its probably not the same as yours, but I didn't know you had to have the same opinion in order to post on a 'discussion' thread. lol
 
What are you doing here? Either you look forward to the movie, be careful about your enthusiasm, or don't come here if you don't like what you see/saw thus far

I don't have any problem with Peter starting with a girlfriend, she might start as best friend and not downright girlfriend
Raimi's Spider-Man films are silly entertainment, character development isn't their strong suit, and none of them is anywhere near perfection, especially not SM2
 
this thread is a 'discussion' for Amazing Spider-Man. I'm adding my opinion to the discussion. Its probably not the same as yours, but I didn't know you had to have the same opinion in order to post on a 'discussion' thread. lol

You're adding your opinions on Raimi's Spider-man films in the ASM section while making flawed criticisms about a film you haven't seen. I also never said you couldn't add your "opinion" on this thread. I just don't understand why people like yourself need to really make multiple threads on different forums stating your dislike for a film you haven't seen BUT also have completely flawed notions about.
 
Last edited:
What are you doing here? Either you look forward to the movie, be careful about your enthusiasm, or don't come here if you don't like what you see/saw thus far

I don't have any problem with Peter starting with a girlfriend, she might start as best friend and not downright girlfriend
Raimi's Spider-Man films are silly entertainment, character development isn't their strong suit, and none of them is anywhere near perfection, especially not SM2

Fact that we should know about this film: Peter does not start off with a girlfriend. They aren't even friends at first, just classmates. You know, that's why there's that scene where Peter "asks" Gwen out on a date.
 
You're adding your opinions on Raimi's Spider-man films in the ASM section while making flawed criticisms about a film you haven't seen. I also never said you couldn't add your "opinion" on this thread. I just don't understand why people like yourself need to really make multiple threads on different forums stating your dislike for a film you haven't seen BUT also have completely flawed notions about.

No one is making multiple threads on the same subject. The mods would quickly delete that. I made one that was merged into this one, so dont even try to argue that. I can make an opinion based off of the trailer. There is nothing wrong with that. When I heard the plot and pre-production stuff, it sounded like a bad idea. The trailer came out and it re-enforced my original opinion that this whole reboot is just a money making attempt to keep the franchise rather than a story to please the majority audience. Its like saying "you cant dislike this franchise without seeing the sequel first" - huh ??? seriously dude???

The majority of audience is not looking forward to Amazing Spider-Man. The majority wanted a part 4 or a continuation of the original trilogy despite the awful Spider-Man 3 which could be forgiven if part 4 lived up to the original two.

Look at Spider-Man 1...it cant be topped.

-The upside down raining Spider-Man kissing MJ scene was iconic and even mimicked by Jack Black at the Oscars that year. Its a scene that is embedded in the american audience like the first time batman in 1989 came crashing down in the museum...
-James Franco & Elizabeth Banks were NOBODIES and after Spider-Man, they went soaring to A-Lister. Not saying this couldnt happen in AS, but I doubt any cast member can touch Franco's A-List status.
-The perfect casting of Franco / DeFoe. They look like father and son. Brilliant casting decisions by Raimi's group.
-The date it was released - a year after 9-11, when America was looking for a hero, also based in NYC. It was perfect. Audience jumped for joy when the movie gave them what they wanted, a hero of NY that fought for the good of the ppl. It was perfect.
-Also set the standards for Marvel Superhero movies. X-Men , Blade were small time compared to Spider-Man. It showed that a great story, great direction, great actors together can take the genre to new heights thus opening the door for more comic book franchise films (DD, Hulk, FF, Iron Man, Thor, Capt Amerca) - you can thank Spider-Man 1 for all of that :)
 
Last edited:
I like this costume more than Raimi's. The colors are better, the design is better.
 
You are full of KAK. You have not seen the film but a goddamn trailer. You don't know how his character develops early on. He could be portrayed as a shy nerd in the beginning, but you are just jumping to conclusions and putting the cart before the horse because they show him with a hot girlfriend? Great argument, Einstein.

Spiderman 1 was silly childish entertainment. Sam Raimey's Spiderman had like ZERO humour. You do know that Spiderman is known to be a wise ass? He was a crybaby throughout 1,2 and 3. He danced in a nightclub. The new Spiderman more closely fits the comic book. Organic webshooters? Sam Raimey created that out of thin air. One of the biggest flaws in the old series. If you are going to create a film based on a superhero then get the basics RIGHT.

Plus, Spiderman 1 was TOO colourful. Green Goblin? What a joke he was, in that childish outfit. One of the worst performances I've seen to date. Like I said, you're full of kak. I would wait until you actually WATCH Amazing Spiderman before sprouting your nonsense. Full of kak.
 
[YT]Btcw21AtjiE&feature=g-all-u[/YT]


new Hardee's commercial. notice the Daily Bugle newspapers have the same style as the raimi films rather than what we've seen in set pics for the new film. interesting

I rember the set pics from this, freakin awesome promotion.
 
I re-watched Sam Raimi's Spider-Man 1 from 2002. The movie is a DECADE old and still holds up very well and has the fun movie experience we got in Avengers. Just a great popcorn flick, but Spider-Man has a lot more emotion than a typical blockbuster. Thats why it can't be categorized next to Transformers. Its a summer blockbuster, but a lot more emotion and character develop which is why Spider-Man is so successful.

So the one thing that stands out when comparing Sam Raimi Spider-Man 1 to the reboot. The character Peter Parker. That is the most important part, imo - is the character of Spider-man. Yeah, the look of the costume, the villain, the plot, all that is important, but not as important as the actual character.

Peter Parker is suppose to be a nerd. And Sam Raimi got the character CORRECT. Peter in the film was very shy and couldn't even to girl. When MJ said the comment about his eyes in the cafeteria , Peter couldn't even come up with any response, just smiled - which meant he was terrible with girls. The character of Peter Parker is famous because us nerds can relate to that character. He's one of us! He becomes a superhero. A guy just like you and I. Thats whats so great about the character. Raimi understood that. He made Peter shy , a bit of a loner because thats what nerds are in high school, kind of lonely except for a few friends (Harry). It was perfect.

Now fast foward to the reboot. Here is Peter Parker - with a SMOKING HOT GIRLFRIEND ! Emma Stone ! WTF ? I understand Peter had a gf in the comics, but things they've changed about the character for the big screen was the right changes. Things from the comic book sometimes cant transcend to the big screen. And the Gwen character needed to be added later in the film when Peter gets his confidence. The audience can't relate to this Peter at all. He is witty , charming...That is NOT Peter Parker. "Oh no, small knifes, my biggest weakness...BAMMM". Peter can do that LATER after he gains confidence. Come on, this is not a nerdy Peter Parker. You are killing the character why we love Spider-Man. Raimi's got it right about the character ! He was not witty, charming, sarcastic, and had the hottest woman in NYC (Emma Stone). Please! Guys, seriously, this reboot is a major mistake, a last minute attempt to make money to keep the franchise from Disney. You can't tell the audience "This guy is a nerd and you can relate to......but here is his smoking hot beautiful girlfriend he got in high school!". Not buying it, Sony. Just simply not buying it...

And we get to the web shooter. I understand in the cartoon & original comic , he was scientist and made the web shooters, but that worked for that material, doesnt transcend well to the big screen , imo. Raimi made the correct move by making it organic. It worked well. Didn't take a lot of scenes / dialogue to explain how it works like they have to do in the reboot to teach the audience that this one is different.

And finally the suit just looks awful in the reboot. There was absolutely nothing wrong with the suit in the first three. They want to change the suit to make sure it doesnt confuse the casual audience that this is a reboot and not a sequel to the awful SPider-man 3, but their design just isn't very good looking.

How are they going to tell the audience that this character we can relate to bc he's a nerd when he's with Emma Stone, the hottest woman in the US. Seriously?!? It's a terrible idea.Avengers NAILED the characters - and thank god the studio is being rewarded with billion dollars because they deserve it. They got the characters right and put them in a fun plot. I just have absolutely no faith in Spider-Man reboot at all. Raimi's first two Spider-Man were near perfect. If it aint broke, dont fix it. Spider-Man 3 was terrible, but look how great the character of Peter was in the first two. Raimi understood the character and got it right.

They honestly should have just did a Spider-Man 4 minus Sam Raimi and Tobey Maguire. No one wants to sit through another origin story. We want a new adventure / villain for Peter. Smart by going with Lizard. I like that villain, but to reboot the origin, no thanks.

I disagree with you 100% on everything but the only thing I'm going to say is that are you that shallow that you believe he can't get a hot girlfiend because what, he's nerdy? Women aren't always going after the hottest guy in school. Sometimes they find a guy who is very nice and who they can get along with.
 
[YT]Btcw21AtjiE&feature=g-all-u[/YT]


new Hardee's commercial. notice the Daily Bugle newspapers have the same style as the raimi films rather than what we've seen in set pics for the new film. interesting

I love how the guy says his suit is "pretty weak" but then he shows he's the real deal and awesome :woot:
 
I re-watched Sam Raimi's Spider-Man 1 from 2002. The movie is a DECADE old and still holds up very well and has the fun movie experience we got in Avengers. Just a great popcorn flick, but Spider-Man has a lot more emotion than a typical blockbuster. Thats why it can't be categorized next to Transformers. Its a summer blockbuster, but a lot more emotion and character develop which is why Spider-Man is so successful.

So the one thing that stands out when comparing Sam Raimi Spider-Man 1 to the reboot. The character Peter Parker. That is the most important part, imo - is the character of Spider-man. Yeah, the look of the costume, the villain, the plot, all that is important, but not as important as the actual character.

Peter Parker is suppose to be a nerd. And Sam Raimi got the character CORRECT. Peter in the film was very shy and couldn't even speak to girl. When MJ said the comment about his eyes in the cafeteria , Peter couldn't even come up with any response, just smiled - which meant he was terrible with girls. The character of Peter Parker is famous because us nerds can relate to that character. He's one of us! He becomes a superhero. A guy just like you and I. Thats whats so great about the character. Raimi understood that. He made Peter shy , a bit of a loner because thats what nerds are in high school, kind of lonely except for a few friends (Harry). It was perfect.

Now fast foward to the reboot. Here is Peter Parker - with a SMOKING HOT GIRLFRIEND ! Emma Stone ! WTF ? I understand Peter had a gf in the comics, but things they've changed about the character for the big screen was the right changes. Things from the comic book sometimes cant transcend to the big screen. And the Gwen character needed to be added later in the film when Peter gets his confidence. The audience can't relate to this Peter at all. He is witty , charming...That is NOT Peter Parker. "Oh no, small knifes, my biggest weakness...BAMMM". Peter can do that LATER after he gains confidence. Come on, this is not a nerdy Peter Parker. You are killing the character why we love Spider-Man. Raimi's got it right about the character ! He was not witty, charming, sarcastic, and had the hottest woman in NYC (Emma Stone). Please! Guys, seriously, this reboot is a major mistake, a last minute attempt to make money to keep the franchise from Disney. You can't tell the audience "This guy is a nerd and you can relate to......but here is his smoking hot beautiful girlfriend he got in high school!". Not buying it, Sony. Just simply not buying it...

And we get to the web shooter. I understand in the cartoon & original comic , he was scientist and made the web shooters, but that worked for that material, doesnt transcend well to the big screen , imo. Raimi made the correct move by making it organic. It worked well. Didn't take a lot of scenes / dialogue to explain how it works like they have to do in the reboot to teach the audience that this one is different.

And finally the suit just looks awful in the reboot. There was absolutely nothing wrong with the suit in the first three. They want to change the suit to make sure it doesnt confuse the casual audience that this is a reboot and not a sequel to the awful SPider-man 3, but their design just isn't very good looking.

How are they going to tell the audience that this character we can relate to bc he's a nerd when he's with Emma Stone, the hottest woman in the US. Seriously?!? It's a terrible idea.Avengers NAILED the characters - and thank god the studio is being rewarded with billion dollars because they deserve it. They got the characters right and put them in a fun plot. I just have absolutely no faith in Spider-Man reboot at all. Raimi's first two Spider-Man were near perfect. If it aint broke, dont fix it. Spider-Man 3 was terrible, but look how great the character of Peter was in the first two. Raimi understood the character and got it right.

They honestly should have just did a Spider-Man 4 minus Sam Raimi and Tobey Maguire. No one wants to sit through another origin story. We want a new adventure / villain for Peter. Smart by going with Lizard. I like that villain, but to reboot the origin, no thanks.


I am beginning to think that the general population doesn’t understand anything about Spider-Man. Sam Raimi’s films took A LOT of liberties with the character and the story. While they were fun and classic and I grew up with loving them too, STOP SAYING THAT THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN LOOKS NOTHING LIKE SPIDER-MAN SHOULD BE.

Spider-Man isn’t a wimp or even close to as sensitive as Tobey’s Spider-Man was. It was a fun take on the character (except for Venom and the third film) but that’s not the embodiment of who Peter Parker and Spider-Man is.

Spider-Man is and always has been a wise cracking, sarcastic smart ass. It’s fine if you don’t like it but don’t say it’s nothing like Spider-Man because so far just based on 3 or 4 trailers? He acts more like the real Spider-Man than any of the Raimi films portrayed.

If you’ve never watched the old cartoons and if you’ve never read the comics and you’re basing your opinion on the three Sam Raimi films you need to step back because you just sound ignorant.
 
I re-watched Sam Raimi's Spider-Man 1 from 2002. The movie is a DECADE old and still holds up very well and has the fun movie experience we got in Avengers. Just a great popcorn flick, but Spider-Man has a lot more emotion than a typical blockbuster. Thats why it can't be categorized next to Transformers. Its a summer blockbuster, but a lot more emotion...
don't worry I read the whole thing, just had to cut a little.

For a long time in the comics (haven't read the earliest ditko issues except sandman) Peter has been this charming guy who is funny and witty, his problem is that because he is very smart and his interests are somewhat weird/dorky to some people (photographing and stuff), he's labeled as a nerd and became this outsider who gets bullied all the time

I had that kind of a kid in my school, getting bullied all the time, but then I just kinda desided to get to actually know him and what do you know, he was actually a pretty great, funny guy!

In the movie Andrew's Peter has a hard time asking Gwen out, but once he gets to know the Gwen he can be who he really is with confidence. And when he is Spider-man, he has a mask, so he can be whoever he wants to be, the criminals will never know who he is. Of course he is more confident then and can be witty. And that is what Peter's character is, down to the core

Usually if people don't like this movie I just accept the fact they don't like this, but if you don't accept who the character really is, then you're only a Raimite and I will not take seriously any of your complains, whether it's this or the costume, and I doubt anyone else takes you seriously as well
 
Not to mention Sam Raimi got Spidermans story ass backwards.... Gwen is Peters first love, not Mary Jane!!! For once, we are getting the Spiderman film we deserve that follows the damn comics.

No organic webshooters, which is a start. A wise cracking Spiderman, one who we can relate too... Gwen is the first love, not Mary Jne. Another thing is that Spiderman/Peter Parker is a genius. The guy creates inventions has a genius-level intellect.

The other thing is that Andrew, in the trailers alone, has shown more emotion than Tobey ever did in all three films. Crying like a baby, making ugly facial expressions, doesn't qualify. Heck, even the preview with the burning car demonstrates that this is on a different level. Tobey's acting was flat as can be.
 
Last edited:
I can understand and accept if someone prefer Raimi's version (I will be able to understand and accept after I saw TAS) over Webb's version, regardless of which one is more faithful to the comics. But some people need to understand that what they prefer may not be exactly what the core of the character is about.

anyway, it's great to have several different artistic take on a character. Raimi did a fine job, but his movies were flawed (like all movies are). Webb's movie will probably be flawed as well, which won't prevent it to be great.
 
Now fast foward to the reboot. Here is Peter Parker - with a SMOKING HOT GIRLFRIEND ! Emma Stone ! WTF ? I understand Peter had a gf in the comics, but things they've changed about the character for the big screen was the right changes.
I dunno, I thought Dunst in the first movie was pretty hot (and she still is imo). Oh noes thats totally unreelistic! Why would Raimi do such a thing?

The audience can't relate to this Peter at all. He is witty , charming...
Speak for yourself man, I am witty, charming and incredibly beautiful, I can totally relate to this Peter. :o

That is NOT Peter Parker. "Oh no, small knifes, my biggest weakness...BAMMM".
You're right, that's not Peter Parker, that's Spider-man.

Guys, seriously, this reboot is a major mistake, a last minute attempt to make money to keep the franchise from Disney.
Movies are made for money???? Oh my when did this happen! Thank God there's Marvel Studios: Making Movies for the Sake of Art Since 1993.

I do agree that Raimi's costume was great and that this new one could've been a lot better though, but at this point I don't care, I just wanna see the damn movie.
 
Last edited:
the knife joke is really funny, and Andrew's acting seems spot on.
 
I dunno, I thought Dunst in the first movie was pretty hot (and she still is imo). Oh noes thats totally unreelistic! Why would Raimi do such a thing?

Speak for yourself man, I am witty, charming and incredibly beautiful, I can totally relate to this Peter. :o

You're right, that's not Peter Parker, that's Spider-man.

Movies are made for money???? Oh my when did this happen! Tank God there's Marvel Studios: Making Movies for the Sake of Art Since 1993.

I do agree that Raimi's costume was great and that this new one could've been a lot better though, but at this point I don't care, I just wanna see the damn movie.

Minus the bit about the costume, I agree completely. :D
 
I re-watched Sam Raimi's Spider-Man 1 from 2002. The movie is a DECADE old and still holds up very well and has the fun movie experience we got in Avengers. Just a great popcorn flick, but Spider-Man has a lot more emotion than a typical blockbuster. Thats why it can't be categorized next to Transformers. Its a summer blockbuster, but a lot more emotion and character develop which is why Spider-Man is so successful.

So the one thing that stands out when comparing Sam Raimi Spider-Man 1 to the reboot. The character Peter Parker. That is the most important part, imo - is the character of Spider-man. Yeah, the look of the costume, the villain, the plot, all that is important, but not as important as the actual character.

Peter Parker is suppose to be a nerd. And Sam Raimi got the character CORRECT. Peter in the film was very shy and couldn't even speak to girl. When MJ said the comment about his eyes in the cafeteria , Peter couldn't even come up with any response, just smiled - which meant he was terrible with girls. The character of Peter Parker is famous because us nerds can relate to that character. He's one of us! He becomes a superhero. A guy just like you and I. Thats whats so great about the character. Raimi understood that. He made Peter shy , a bit of a loner because thats what nerds are in high school, kind of lonely except for a few friends (Harry). It was perfect.

Now fast foward to the reboot. Here is Peter Parker - with a SMOKING HOT GIRLFRIEND ! Emma Stone ! WTF ? I understand Peter had a gf in the comics, but things they've changed about the character for the big screen was the right changes. Things from the comic book sometimes cant transcend to the big screen. And the Gwen character needed to be added later in the film when Peter gets his confidence. The audience can't relate to this Peter at all. He is witty , charming...That is NOT Peter Parker. "Oh no, small knifes, my biggest weakness...BAMMM". Peter can do that LATER after he gains confidence. Come on, this is not a nerdy Peter Parker. You are killing the character why we love Spider-Man. Raimi's got it right about the character ! He was not witty, charming, sarcastic, and had the hottest woman in NYC (Emma Stone).

I'm sorry, I found it hard to continue reading ur post after this, because if you honestly think this, then you don't know Spider-Man/Peter Parker AT ALL. You sound like your basing your whole opinion on the previous trilogies....which is why I kindof dislike them now, and you wanna talk realistic? "Mary Jane Watson, the girl next door, the girl I've loved since before I even hit puberty!" yeah because we all are in love with a girl/guy next door....:huh: Raimi did get parts of the character right, I can give you that, and only that, because he also got quite a bit wrong. Spider-Man is witty, a wise-@ss who jokes about with his enemies all the time, Peter Parker has always been charming, and yes while he was shy, I don't recall him having any problems talking to girls.

Also, you're basing this off the little footage you've seen...which *gasp* isn't the movie! seriously how do you know he isn't shy in this one? how do you know he doesn't gain 'confidence' later on? you don't. please before saying 'this movie will SUCK BALLLZ' at least see it first, then you can rant all you want if your right.

I also guess if you can't believe a nerd such as Peter Parker can't get a girlfriend as hot as Gwen Stacy, then you also won't believe that the guy whos playing him is actually dating Emma Stone in *gasp* REAL life.
 
I think the line between Peter being a bit shy around girls has gotten a bit too blurred with him being completely socially incapable.
 
I re-watched Sam Raimi's Spider-Man 1 from 2002. The movie is a DECADE old and still holds up very well and has the fun movie experience we got in Avengers. Just a great popcorn flick, but Spider-Man has a lot more emotion than a typical blockbuster. Thats why it can't be categorized next to Transformers. Its a summer blockbuster, but a lot more emotion and character develop which is why Spider-Man is so successful.

So the one thing that stands out when comparing Sam Raimi Spider-Man 1 to the reboot. The character Peter Parker. That is the most important part, imo - is the character of Spider-man. Yeah, the look of the costume, the villain, the plot, all that is important, but not as important as the actual character.

Peter Parker is suppose to be a nerd. And Sam Raimi got the character CORRECT. Peter in the film was very shy and couldn't even speak to girl. When MJ said the comment about his eyes in the cafeteria , Peter couldn't even come up with any response, just smiled - which meant he was terrible with girls. The character of Peter Parker is famous because us nerds can relate to that character. He's one of us! He becomes a superhero. A guy just like you and I. Thats whats so great about the character. Raimi understood that. He made Peter shy , a bit of a loner because thats what nerds are in high school, kind of lonely except for a few friends (Harry). It was perfect.

Now fast foward to the reboot. Here is Peter Parker - with a SMOKING HOT GIRLFRIEND ! Emma Stone ! WTF ? I understand Peter had a gf in the comics, but things they've changed about the character for the big screen was the right changes. Things from the comic book sometimes cant transcend to the big screen. And the Gwen character needed to be added later in the film when Peter gets his confidence. The audience can't relate to this Peter at all. He is witty , charming...That is NOT Peter Parker. "Oh no, small knifes, my biggest weakness...BAMMM". Peter can do that LATER after he gains confidence. Come on, this is not a nerdy Peter Parker. You are killing the character why we love Spider-Man. Raimi's got it right about the character ! He was not witty, charming, sarcastic, and had the hottest woman in NYC (Emma Stone). Please! Guys, seriously, this reboot is a major mistake, a last minute attempt to make money to keep the franchise from Disney. You can't tell the audience "This guy is a nerd and you can relate to......but here is his smoking hot beautiful girlfriend he got in high school!". Not buying it, Sony. Just simply not buying it...

And we get to the web shooter. I understand in the cartoon & original comic , he was scientist and made the web shooters, but that worked for that material, doesnt transcend well to the big screen , imo. Raimi made the correct move by making it organic. It worked well. Didn't take a lot of scenes / dialogue to explain how it works like they have to do in the reboot to teach the audience that this one is different.

And finally the suit just looks awful in the reboot. There was absolutely nothing wrong with the suit in the first three. They want to change the suit to make sure it doesnt confuse the casual audience that this is a reboot and not a sequel to the awful SPider-man 3, but their design just isn't very good looking.

How are they going to tell the audience that this character we can relate to bc he's a nerd when he's with Emma Stone, the hottest woman in the US. Seriously?!? It's a terrible idea.Avengers NAILED the characters - and thank god the studio is being rewarded with billion dollars because they deserve it. They got the characters right and put them in a fun plot. I just have absolutely no faith in Spider-Man reboot at all. Raimi's first two Spider-Man were near perfect. If it aint broke, dont fix it. Spider-Man 3 was terrible, but look how great the character of Peter was in the first two. Raimi understood the character and got it right.

They honestly should have just did a Spider-Man 4 minus Sam Raimi and Tobey Maguire. No one wants to sit through another origin story. We want a new adventure / villain for Peter. Smart by going with Lizard. I like that villain, but to reboot the origin, no thanks.

So basically you want the reboot to be EXACTY like the old series,you might have aswell said they should have repeated green goblin aswell
 
Oh man, I'm not overreacting now when I tell you guys that I get goosebumps everytime I see that 1 minute clip, and that's because of Andrew's acting! Wow he's perfect!!

i totally understand you man hes so cool! haha he is definitely peter parker
 
Sorry If this comes across as a noobish question but what is the difference between normal 3D and IMAX 3D?(I've never seen a movie in 3D)
 
[YT]Btcw21AtjiE&feature=g-all-u[/YT]


new Hardee's commercial. notice the Daily Bugle newspapers have the same style as the raimi films rather than what we've seen in set pics for the new film. interesting

The way he takes off in that looks a bit like power rangers. mainly because he didnt say anything. the suit is sick though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,391
Messages
22,096,737
Members
45,893
Latest member
DooskiPack
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"