Spidey_62
You just don't get it!
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2009
- Messages
- 6,208
- Reaction score
- 2,386
- Points
- 103
I just died a little
![]()
This picture is so awesome.
I just died a little
![]()
So let's say that Peter's father did an experiment on him when he was young, and the spider bite "activated" his powers. Does that necessarily mean the movie will be bad? It is a good idea, it is just how they execute it.
No. It will just piss off a lot of people because it's not faithful to the origin and because "supposedly" changes the character.
Exactly. Not even saying that Harry would be a focus but I just want to see something interesting. You love the current Batman films so I'm sure you'll agree with me when I say that one of the things I love about what Nolan has done with Batman, is take the characters, remaining as true to them as he can, but putting them in different situations than the comics, for the most part. He's not a slave to comic continuity and saying that this has to happen this way or that way, he does what works best for the story he wants to tell while keeping the characters intact. THAT is how you do an adaptation. I'm hoping Marc Webb and his writers are doing the same thing that Nolan did and Greg Weisman did on Spectacular Spider-Man
It's probably Andrew's stuntdouble William Spencer. The dude's an awesome skater.
Though it looks like William is the guy on the left (him and Andrew look REALLY similar), so I dunno.
So let's say that Peter's father did an experiment on him when he was young, and the spider bite "activated" his powers. Does that necessarily mean the movie will be bad? It is a good idea, it is just how they execute it.
I just died a little
![]()
Definitely agree with that notion, although I would be totally fine if Webb decides to kill off Gwen Stacy during a bridge fight with Spider-Man and a little ol' villain named Green Goblin, haha.
But, let's not forget that BB and TDK weren't created just out of the blue. Nolan was inspired by Year One for BB and The Long Halloween for TDK. It's true with what you're saying, but it is fine to get some inspiration from the comics/graphic novels.
I must say they definitely do look similar if that guy is really Andrew's stunt double, haha.
Well, it happened with Hulk and I still enjoyed the film although I wasn't fond of Bruce's dad testing on him.
That's unfortunate that Spider-Man purists won't enjoy it. This portrayal of Peter Parker appears to be very accurate in terms of character. So what if the origin is slightly changed? It will make the movie more interesting. I don't want to see the same exact origin we got in the 2002 film, I want something new. And in order to give us something new, there has to be some kind of twist.No. It will just piss off a lot of people because it's not faithful to the origin and because "supposedly" changes the character.
Oh yeah of course he was inspired, some of the shots in the dark knight are direct homages to the long halloween and the same with batman begins and year one, but he took ideas from those stories and crafted his own thing is my point and I'm hoping this story can do the same thing..take good ideas and try to make them into something else entirely. He could do an exact replica of Gwen dying though because that hasn't been done. There are several lizard/spider-man battles I'm sure they've done homages to also. I just don't want him or his writers to feel like they HAVE to put certain things in just to appease fans...fans get more pissed when your execution sucks so don't suck up to them just for the hell of it
The shot of Spider-Man and Lizard fighting in the sewer is taken right out of Amazing Spider-Man #6
There is a trade paperback called "Spider-man: Secret Origins." It has several comic books that inspired the movie, so its worth checking out!Geez it's been so long since I've read that..you're right though. They keep mentioning "Torment" so I'm sure there will be some homages to that also
That's unfortunate that Spider-Man purists won't enjoy it. This portrayal of Peter Parker appears to be very accurate in terms of character. So what if the origin is slightly changed? It will make the movie more interesting. I don't want to see the same exact origin we got in the 2002 film, I want something new. And in order to give us something new, there has to be some kind of twist.
I am a huge Spider-Man fan, but I understand that there are so many incarnations of the character in the comics. It isn't a big deal if they change things around for the movie. AS LONG AS IT IS DONE WELL!
The spider bite would still be an accident though. Nobody planned (I'm assuming) on having Peter go in the Spider room and getting bit by a spider.That's how I see it. In some ways, I feel characterization is much more important to a faithful adaptation than a particular event especially in this case since we've already seen a very faithful origin done on screen. However, I can understand why people would be mad at the change because the spider bite being a complete accident is in part significant to the character.
The spider bite would still be an accident though. Nobody planned (I'm assuming) on having Peter go in the Spider room and getting bit by a spider.
LOL exactly. Him getting tested on or whatever as a kid wouldn't be an accident.You're right, it's still an accident either way. I know Richard is a genius but there's no way he's that much of a genius where he can plan an elaborate scheme where his son, at age 16/17, would wander into Oscorp, then into a room full of radioactive/altered spiders and then get bitten by the science bug
Today was a good day for TASM, not sure why. But I'm reeaaallly excited.
You're right, it's still an accident either way. I know Richard is a genius but there's no way he's that much of a genius where he can plan an elaborate scheme where his son, at age 16/17, would wander into Oscorp, then into a room full of radioactive/altered spiders and then get bitten by the science bug
Today was a good day for TASM, not sure why. But I'm reeaaallly excited.
t:I was referring to the rumor that there was something in his DNA, which doesn't necessarily make him an "everyman" anymore. but
yeah, you're right.
Even if there is something in his DNA, it won't change the fact that Peter is a nerd, and faces many problems as listed above.I still don't agree with that sentiment but I can see the other side of it. To me, what makes Peter an everyman is the issues he deals with..girls, school, job, money, family..he goes through the same ups and downs that every person has dealt with. If his dad messed with his DNA, it doesn't change any of the stuff he'll have to deal with but I understand the other side of the argument as well, I just disagree
Purists would be mad cause the new origin does away with the notion of the possibility that it could have been "any of us" that were bitten, spiderman could be anybody.
rim?is it weird that i am excited for when rim gets to see the movie early? I just really want to hear what he thinks of the movie.