REVIEW BY
Kyle Orton
The Amazing Spider-Man 2 2014 ★★★★★
Watched Apr 16, 2014
Kyle Orton’s review:
It is quite simply brilliant. Trying to explain why without giving anything away is tricky but here goes ...
It is perhaps to be expected in 2014 that visually a film will pass muster but the manner of the passing here is quite exceptional. Better still, there is none of the pretentiousness about it that occasioned Avatar (reviewed
here) or—much worse—Life of Pi (see
here).
The acting is sensational. It is impossible to overpraise Andrew Garfield. As someone who actually liked Tobey Maguire and the series of Spider-Man films he did, objectivity requires one to note the night-and-day difference in quality; Garfield is just so muc better it diminishes one's view of the entire former series. Garfield manages to be funny, stroppy, love-struck, and sad—and all without inducing this cynical member of the audience to throw one's arms up in despair at the mushiness of it all. The other stand-out is Dane DeHaan, who starred in one of my very favourite films of the last few years, Chronicle (2012). I've heard remarks that there was something similar between his characters in the two films and it is true he does wild-eyed and unhinged in both—but it's so well well done and so adapted to circumstances that I think this is unfair. It is also quite something that the superhero's love-interest, played by Emma Stone, is no mere cut-out in this film; she has a character all her own and the film would be much the poorer without her. I don't like Jamie Foxx: I've looked at his recent films—White House Down and Django Unchained—and while both had severe limitations in their own right, they were the poorer for Mr. Foxx's contribution in my judgment. If this film has a drag factor, he is undoubtedly it, but fair's fair he is passable in the role he is given—at least once he become's the villain.
The story is actually much better done on reflection than it might seem during watching—a reflection of how well it is brought off, the subtlety and smoothness. It manages to weave together two separate story-lines and conclude both in a satisfactory way—albeit leaving one open for a sequel. At two-and-a-half hours it is extraordinarily well-paced and you will never know that it was on for that long. It surpasses in quality and intrigue even its predecessor, which (in my opinion) is quite an achievement.
It is a very unusual experience—especially at the present time—to be so impressed with a film, to find it in all essentials and most particulars faultless. Given the forecast for the rest of the year, it makes a strong case for making sure one gets to see this.