Exactly. I don't know why this is so hard to understand? Yes, Bill Finger contributed to the look, but he didn't design it, it wasn't his art, it was Bob Kane's. That's it, end of story. Just because Bob Kane had a dumb idea of a blond haired, red costumed Batman, and then Bill Finger came in and suggested the Black and Grey, a Bat-symbol on the chest, and bat ears, doesn't mean it's Bill Finger's design. Yes, those all contributed to the overall look that we all know and love today, no doubt about it....but Bill Finger still didn't come up with the design, Bob Kane did, as he was the one who drew it. Like I said before, when we look at something like a Neal Adams' Batman, we credit Adams for his design and art, we don't go back and say it's actually Bill Finger's, because it was his idea for the color scheme, the ears and the symbol, etc. No, it's Neal Adams' Batman, it's Frank Miller's Batman, it's Breyfogle's Batman, it's Jim Lee's Batman, and yes, it's Bob Kane's Batman. It's not Finger's design, he wasn't the artist.
I understand that Bill Finger got the short end of the stick on a lot of credit for Batman throughout the era, but don't start crediting him for other people's art. That's not the way of going about it. The entire point of setting the record straight on Bill Finger's legacy, is to give proper credit. The same should go to all Batman contributors, artists, and writers, etc. And I know it's fashionable to s**t all over Bob Kane these days, but he was one the creators of Batman, and that was his design. It wasn't Bill Finger's: bottom line.