Or Corvus Glaive for that matter.
Yeah I hope they keep the aspect that as long as his spear is intact he can't be killed I'm sorry if it's a unpopular thing but I hope the "regular" human avengers get RUN THROUGH cause they should pose no threat to the Black Order
Yeah the Outriders being canon fodder or shock troops.
The BO singlehandedly should be able to take on the Avengers.
The next time someone says that a live-action She-Hulk should be CGI, I'll just direct them to this gif... I mean don't get me wrong, Proxima looks good. But you can tell from a mile that she's not real.
The next time someone says that a live-action She-Hulk should be CGI, I'll just direct them to this gif... I mean don't get me wrong, Proxima looks good. But you can tell from a mile that she's not real.
Is that Mantis?
The next time someone says that a live-action She-Hulk should be CGI, I'll just direct them to this gif... I mean don't get me wrong, Proxima looks good. But you can tell from a mile that she's not real.
The next time someone says that a live-action She-Hulk should be CGI, I'll just direct them to this gif... I mean don't get me wrong, Proxima looks good. But you can tell from a mile that she's not real.
The next time someone says that a live-action She-Hulk should be CGI, I'll just direct them to this gif... I mean don't get me wrong, Proxima looks good. But you can tell from a mile that she's not real.
I think it might just be the gif... wait and see what it looks like on the big screen. So long as it's not like Steppenwolf who literally looked like a character from a PlayStation 2 cut scene.
Although Proxima is CGI, her face is a dead ringer for the motion capture actress who did the stunt work so I wonder if perhaps they just layered over her face?
To be fair, the CGI rendering on Thanos is quite good (especially the eyes) as is Brolin's mo-cap performance, so I wouldn't knock the process. It's just a shame that what we've seen of Proxima thus far clearly isn't up to par.
I just hope that they don't force BW beating Proxima Midnight cause that should not happen AT ALL
The next time someone says that a live-action She-Hulk should be CGI, I'll just direct them to this gif... I mean don't get me wrong, Proxima looks good. But you can tell from a mile that she's not real.
I've noticed often that if there are multiple CGI characters in one film, the minor characters seem to look less realistic than the character with the most screentime. For example, Davy Jones looks better than his crew members in Pirates of the Caribbean and Smaug looks better than the CGI orcs in The Hobbit. Of course there are exceptions, like the new Planet of the Apes movies. It's justifiable, and it's not knocking the VFX department since it makes more sense to spend more time rendering the characters with the most screentime, and as we can already kind of tell, Thanos will probably be the best-rendered CGI character in this. Could Proxima look better? Sure, but since she's an alien character anyway I can forgive it. It's also hard to tell since we've barely seen much of her in action.
The next time someone says that a live-action She-Hulk should be CGI, I'll just direct them to this gif... I mean don't get me wrong, Proxima looks good. But you can tell from a mile that she's not real.
I am guessing the Russo's would rather put CGI on the actress playing Midnight than have her sit in a makeup chair for hours (which is hours they can't shoot her scenes) and have her performance hampered by the heavy makeup she would likely require to get made up properly as the character. So I can see why they went with the CGI.
I dont know. Remember when this leaked online MONTHS ago:
![]()
![]()
I know the gif is quick, but she looks pretty damn real in this shot.
and yet Gamora and Nebula both wear "heavy" make-up and their performances are not hampered in the least...