Schlosser85
Civilian
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2007
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 30,209
- Points
- 0
Legacy's problems weren't the cast's fault. Renner was really stuck in a thankless position.
Legacy's problems weren't the cast's fault. Renner was really stuck in a thankless position.
Why did they hand the franchise to Gilroy anyhow? Did every experienced director turn them down or something?He was asked to be a low rent Bourne by a director with not much experience, who clearly didn't understand what made Greengrass' films work so well.
I think this is a fair assessment and I agree with every single word.I'm not a big Renner fan, I find him kind of dull and uncharismatic, but I don't think Legacy with a different actor and the same script would have been all that much better.
He was willing? Someone at the studio wrongly thought his scripts mattered? It isn't unknown that Greengrass and Damon weren't exactly the biggest fans of his scripts and that they took them apart to come of with their two excellent films together.Why did they hand the franchise to Gilroy anyhow? Did every experienced director turn them down or something?
I'm not a big Renner fan, I find him kind of dull and uncharismatic, but I don't think Legacy with a different actor and the same script would have been all that much better.
You can thank Gilroy for that. What was the point of making him a half-assed Bourne, telling a story that doesn't matter, running alongside a story people actually care about?Why weren't they his fault? I did not care about his character at all.
At first I found it odd how much more tedious Legacy's script was considering it had the same screenwriter as every other Bourne movie, but if what you say is true and Damon/Greengrass did a lot of tweaking of Gilroy's earlier scrips, that makes sense.
Yes that explanation makes sense and more importantly he did direct Michael Clayton as Vile just pointed out. Honestly I forgot all these little details but you guys reminding me shows that this trainwreck was probably unavoidable. The whole set up actually looks good on paper. The only thing they didn't factor is that Damon and Greengrass were the real men behind the curtain.He was willing? Someone at the studio wrongly thought his scripts mattered? It isn't unknown that Greengrass and Damon weren't exactly the biggest fans of his scripts and that they took them apart to come of with their two excellent films together.
That is a cheat indeed. I thought Oscar Isaac's character was wasted (In fact he was the one the directed wanted as the lead but Universal said nay.)
I had no idea Isaac was in Legacy until you brought it up, but now Googling him from the movie and remembering who he is (which shows how much impression he made), yea he was wasted.
One of the drawbacks in Legacy diluting tension was that they didn't give Cross any adversary like Clive Owen or Karl Urban. He just fought regular cops and some bland assassins who weren't anything special.
Even the one-scene hitmen in Identity and Supremacy who weren't even the "main" opponent, like the one in Paris in Identity or Marton Csokas in Supremacy, seemed way more dangerous than anyone in Legacy.
Well, he had Edward Norton sitting in an office looking at computer screens and being evil.