Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]515971[/split]
I'm guessing then Superman still fails to talk to Batman before the fight despite having ample time to do so.
ApophènX;33897961 said:That is in line with the movie. The governoe said "see a democracy is when people talk to each other". It is always woman that will bring change nd talk, calmness, to the childish bots who doen't want to share (quoting WW). That's part of the talk of the film, they are both looking for truth and justice but will only let themselvs manipulated by the one who is high up on his ego. Lex represent a man with no power but unlimited knowledge. The risk of books and the lover of Metropolis's lybrary.
I dunno man. It's peeing me off! I don't want to have to pay any more for the SF.Being in Australia does anyone know how i can purchase the digital copy of the ultimate cut so I can also view the special features?. I really want to see the features
I liked Eisenberg's quirky lines and delivery, like Lane Lo in the morning. Lola in slacks.
I think you need to pay more attention next time,before crapping on something.It was clearly shown KGBeast burnt all the bodies to make it look like Superman heat visioned them,and then the actress who was paid by Luthor testified that after Superman came,"then came fire",thus implicating Superman.
Since Louis was taken away by the chief she didn't see anything helpful. I'm sure when she was debriefed by the CIA she told them that. Who could of debunked Superman's involvement but they were too busy covering their own ass
1. No one said Superman killed people with bullets. The Senate were told that because of Superman interfering, the government attacked the village. Lois was locked in a room while all this was happening remember.
2. Have you ever watched the news? They blow everything out of proportion and make up there own stories. The juiciest one would be that Superman was a co conspirator, and the evidence planted by Lex in Wally's apartment help that case.
3. Lex didn't want to have to create DD but it was a last resort. He thought he could control DD because he used his blood. Kinda silly for him to think that, and we were never out right told that. But you can assume that's the case with the , "blood of my blood" line.
I...I actually hated that line..
That and the "I don't hate the sinner, I hate the sin." were just..weird.
I wonder if those that felt that Lois's bullet plot line in the TC was pointless feel differently now that there was more to it in the UC- especially considering the Daily Planet is reporting that Lex was arrested in connection with the Senate bombing(which was one of the few things that had me scratching my head in the TC) - It seems like she's the reason he was arrested on those charges, despite us not ever seeing Perry run that story, or Lois telling the authorities.
I LOVE everything around the Senate hearing now. The added bits of footage with Lois and then the actress really make everything come together and build up nicely. Another minor head scratcher I had in the TC was I was wondering why Senator Finch seems afraid of Lex immediately before the hearing("So whatcha been up to?"), when she actually stood up to him in his house a few scenes before. Makes so much sense now!
I liked Eisenberg's quirky lines and delivery, like “Lane Lo in the morning. Lola in slacks.”
I...I actually hated that line..
That and the "I don't hate the sinner, I hate the sin." were just..weird.
someone pointed out that the "Lo lane..." line is a playoff of quote of something....and the sinner line is a play off of "Lover the sinner, hate the sin"
He speaks in quotes a lot, something I enjoy about his character
It's a quote (or similar to a quote in the book, I haven't read the book, lol.) from "Lolita" a novel by Vladimir Nabokov.
But she still would've heard the gun shots and if they bothered to call her up to the stand she would've said that, hence leading to a more thorough investigation instead of just taking the words of an unreliable witness at face value.
Again this was just bad writing IMO.
To me the whole 3rd act is a mess and the supposedly smart lex expecting a mindless monstrosity to obey his command because they share blood just goes to further show me how silly the writing on this movie is.
ApophènX;33898233 said:This is why the last part where we goes black science ritualistic crazy is great. Blood is more than book, it is genetic information. It is also interesting since he said his pen wanted to burn Martha like a witch. And the people wanted to burn Superman like a witch. It's very reminiscent of persecution. Lex believe in knowledge as power, it is only evidence he would think sopething created out of knowledge would obey him (plus it kindz does what he intended so...). Plus Lex is someone who follows the step of his father ("will daddy be angry if i change ...) he obeied his father's will, it's only natural he creat an abomination from his own blood (the devil he spoke about was him in the end), he create his son but also a metaphor of how he sees himself.
Actually Doomsday was about to crush lex before superman intervened. so his whole plan came off looking laughably dumb to me.But Im glad you enjoyed that part even though to me it was as dumb as Gene Hackman's lex creating nuclear man in superman IV.