Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates.
Starting January 9th, site maintenance is ongoing until further notice, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
That depends. As Chaseter pointed out, not all dinosaurs may have laid eggs.I'm gonna have to go w/ egg . . . dinosaurs hatched from eggs, and apparently the dinos evolved into birds, so the real question of the day should be: what came first the dinosaur or the egg? *scratches chin*
That depends. As Chaseter pointed out, not all dinosaurs may have laid eggs.
I take issue with your vocabulary, but yeah. I'd agree with that, again from a literalist perspective on the question.however, given the liklihood that most did, wouldn't you think that would be the case? that a chicken evolved from an egg-laying dinosaur at some point?
and if not, do you feel that the first organism evolved from a lower lifeform, to lay an egg (basically do you still stand behind the notion that the creature to lay the egg must have come first)?
The egg came first
I selected chicken because I generally think of the question in not-quote-so-literal terms. I like to take it back to the concept of the first organism to appear on earth.I honestly dont know how anyone could think a Chicken came before an Egg.
I mean - come on - where did the Chicken come from? Did all of a sudden *POOF!* instant birdie?
I selected chicken because I generally think of the question in not-quote-so-literal terms. I like to take it back to the concept of the first organism to appear on earth.
By the way: yeah, Creationists are likely going to select the option of the chicken coming first.
I made stated a good theory on the previous page.I honestly dont know how anyone could think a Chicken came before an Egg.
I mean - come on - where did the Chicken come from? Did all of a sudden *POOF!* instant birdie?
I 100% understand Evolution. I didn't Imply that Bird Laid Egg, Hatched into Chicken. I know that Evolution is Generations of minor changes that lead into large changes over many, many years.There were eggs before chickens.
I don't know when so-called, "Pre-Chickens," evolved into modern chickens. I never claimed to.
I don't know what, "Pre-Chickens," were called, and I'm unfaimilar with their overall classification.
All of those questions were completely asinine and had nothing to do with the actual process of evolution. Way to not ask a single relevant question.
In any case, the main point is that evolution consists of small, accumulated changes over time. A bird didn't hatch and then change into another species of animal over the course of its life, as you implied.
I called that particular implication out because of the fact that it's a commonly held misconception and I'm goddamn sick and tired of people perpetuating false notions when it comes to evolution and science at large.
*DEEP BREATH*
It's not your fault, though.
Chicken's can fly genius, though they often have they re wings clipped.Chickens used to be capable of (somewhat) extended periods of flight.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/05/26/chicken.egg/a team made up of a geneticist, philosopher and chicken farmer claim to have found an answer. It was the egg.
Put simply, the reason is down to the fact that genetic material does not change during an animal's life.
Therefore the first bird that evolved into what we would call a chicken, probably in prehistoric times, must have first existed as an embryo inside an egg.
Professor John Brookfield, a specialist in evolutionary genetics at the University of Nottingham, told the UK Press Association the pecking order was clear.
The living organism inside the eggshell would have had the same DNA as the chicken it would develop into, he said.
"Therefore, the first living thing which we could say unequivocally was a member of the species would be this first egg," he added. "So, I would conclude that the egg came first."
The same conclusion was reached by his fellow "eggsperts" Professor David Papineau, of King's College London, and poultry farmer Charles Bourns.
Mr Papineau, an expert in the philosophy of science, agreed that the first chicken came from an egg and that proves there were chicken eggs before chickens.
He told PA people were mistaken if they argued that the mutant egg belonged to the "non-chicken" bird parents.
"I would argue it is a chicken egg if it has a chicken in it," he said.
"If a kangaroo laid an egg from which an ostrich hatched, that would surely be an ostrich egg, not a kangaroo egg."......
I'm not an atheist. Keep jumping to conclusions, though...it makes you look smarter, and more worldly!
I take issue with your vocabulary, but yeah. I'd agree with that, again from a literalist perspective on the question.
How about this one:
How many Angels can dance on the Head of a Pin?
How about this one:
How many Angels can dance on the Head of a Pin?