Iron Man 2 The Critics review Iron Man 2

Eh,like they will do away enough with that good stuff in the movie. I think too much is being saved for Iron Man 3,if it happens,it may become Spiderman 3 ish if Iron Man 2 isn't Spiderman 3 bad. Hammer sounds like wasted potential,the crap storylines I mentioned sound very predictable,Stark is just going to keep drinking without being wasted going in Iron Man mode,and of course the Mandarin will have a weak-ass presence as well with no build up for him to be in the third movie. I want to see Stark drunk as hell because of all his problems fighting as Ironman,it would make for great drama.

Yea I agree with you somewhat. But what made the first movie such a huge hit was because of RDJ's performance and the light tone of the movie that was just light hearted fun. The casual movie goer's ate it up! Making an Iron-man movie with a dark tone and an alocholic superhero would probably turn some off from it. Its a tad bit over done with studios trying to make super hero movies all dark and edgy like Dark knight you know? I say keep the Iron-man movies like they are!
 
The reviews so far (well, 3 that I've seen, assuming they're legit) have a Spiderman 2 vibe: more of the same but bigger and better.
 
I've yet to see a superhero sequel that isn't more of the same yet just amped up beyond it's predecessor. So that won't bother me at all.
 
I've yet to see a superhero sequel that isn't more of the same yet just amped up beyond it's predecessor. So that won't bother me at all.

I wouldn't say TDK and BB were particularly similar at all, but we'd just go off topic arguing about it. Either way, my previous post wasn't negatively implied.
 
Yea I agree with you somewhat. But what made the first movie such a huge hit was because of RDJ's performance and the light tone of the movie that was just light hearted fun. The casual movie goer's ate it up! Making an Iron-man movie with a dark tone and an alocholic superhero would probably turn some off from it. Its a tad bit over done with studios trying to make super hero movies all dark and edgy like Dark knight you know? I say keep the Iron-man movies like they are!

Would be interesting though if a Superhero film did tackle a subject matter like that.
 
The trailers showed us some awesome stuff, but i'm confident that there is a lot more that they haven't shown us, i mean, look at the first iron man trailer, it had cool sequences, but there were still awesome scenes in the movie

The trailers for IM pretty much showed ALL the best action sequences of the movie, hope it isnt the case this time.
 
The trailers for IM pretty much showed ALL the best action sequences of the movie, hope it isnt the case this time.

They saved some great moments for the first film and I was so happy that they left them out of the trailers. When Iron Man lands and then punches the terrorist off the roof and then mows down everyone else. That was not in any trailers or promos.
 
I think Iron Man 2 is going to be so packed with great characters, action and plotlines that it will be ridiculously entertaining. That said, there won't be as much chance to get so indepth into Stark's character with so many others requiring screentime. Justin Hammer, Whiplash, the Black Widow, Nick Fury and probably more screentime for Rhodey naturally means less Tony Stark. It also means the straight blueprint of the first movie - moreorless standard superhero origin movie plot and pacing - will change to be a bevy of subplots being juggled, all leading to a big action climax.

I'm expecting IM2 to be possibly even more enjoyable than the original, but possibly not as good a film in terms of storytelling and characterisation.
 
Funnily enough, one of the things I'm most looking forward to hearing from the incoming reviews is opinions on Sam Rockwell as Justin Hammer. I'm a big fan of Rockwell, and despite the fact that he's had little fanfare in the marketing, I'm secretly hoping he steals the movie.
 
Funnily enough, one of the things I'm most looking forward to hearing from the incoming reviews is opinions on Sam Rockwell as Justin Hammer. I'm a big fan of Rockwell, and despite the fact that he's had little fanfare in the marketing, I'm secretly hoping he steals the movie.

Same sentiments here man. I like Rockwell a lot, and even though we've only seen/heard a little bit about his role, it all sounds fun to me. I hope he has the chance to shine.
 
All the actors are good.... I think the chat between Whiplash and hammer will be fun...

are we getting off topic? This is supposed to be the review thread!
 
I think Iron Man 2 is going to be so packed with great characters, action and plotlines that it will be ridiculously entertaining. That said, there won't be as much chance to get so indepth into Stark's character with so many others requiring screentime. Justin Hammer, Whiplash, the Black Widow, Nick Fury and probably more screentime for Rhodey naturally means less Tony Stark. It also means the straight blueprint of the first movie - moreorless standard superhero origin movie plot and pacing - will change to be a bevy of subplots being juggled, all leading to a big action climax.

I'm expecting IM2 to be possibly even more enjoyable than the original, but possibly not as good a film in terms of storytelling and characterisation.

This story would say otherwise. It sounds like Stark is fleshed out bigtime...

http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/movies/stark_naked_2pFfNmWfKsi3kNyCZ6eMoO
 
What i would like to know if the after end credits scene reveals...

Cap. America and Thor.

As reported by SHH awhile back if its indeed true.
 
It opens in 3 days in the UK. Where are the reviews? Even if there were an embargo it would surely be lifted by now..
 
The first french reviews are very good.
Probably better than the first movie, especially the one from "Le Nouvel Observateur", a french newsmagazine wich, usually, litteraly butchers that kind of film.
 
The first french reviews are very good.
Probably better than the first movie, especially the one from "Le Nouvel Observateur", a french newsmagazine wich, usually, litteraly butchers that kind of film.
Here's the link to that review.

And here's the text, run through Google Translate:
PARIS (AP) - "I privatized world peace," he trumpets. Iron Man is a man of iron and principles: no question of yielding to U.S. government secrets to the weapon that makes him invincible and can hold in check all the wicked of the world. However, the trouble will accumulate for him in "Iron Man 2" (Wednesday on French screens).

Two years after the first episode, director Jon Favreau Robert Downey Jr. again in the role of Tony Stark, billionaire playboy and a megalomaniac who has publicly revealed he was "Iron Man", a character with magic armor and implant palladium in the chest. Ex-arms manufacturer, heir to an industrial empire inherited from his father disappeared 20 years ago, Tony Stark has seen the horrors of war before being stored now in the peace camp.

So when he goes before the Senate Committee of Defense, which seeks to extricate him the secret of his armor, he replied: "Armor and I are one". Egocentric, glib, narcissistic womanizer, an alcoholic at times when he has no armor on the back between Robocop and Terminator, between Superman and Batman, Tony Stark would never suspect a thing and sees itself as the main benefactor and protector-of-humanity, half-Steve Jobs, mid-Bernard Tapie.

But when he decides to drive his own Formula-1 at the "Historic Grand Prix" in Monaco, he found someone suddenly across his path. Ivan Vanko (Mickey Rourke), who came from Siberia to the challenge and avenge his father, an engineer like him and who was, perhaps, the co-inventor of the famous armor. The man burst onto the runway in an outfit with an implant palladium external blew some cars, fights with a whip with electric Tony Stark / Iron Man, before being overpowered and arrested. "You lost, Stark!" He sneers before being taken away by police.

This incident will upset the fair insurance billionaire. "This man can continue to protect us?" Wonder loop televisions worldwide. The army redoubled zeal to get the secret of his armor. Justin Hammer (Sam Rockwell), a manufacturer of weapons without faith or law, also wants to seize it. And why does escape from prison Ivan Vanko.

Faced with adversity and danger, Tony Stark can count on his friend, Colonel Rhodes (Don Cheadle), on his faithful secretary Virginia "Pepper" Potts (Gwyneth Paltrow), whom he appointed president of its industrial empire, and a new dream creature, Natasha Romanoff (Scarlett Johansson), come from his legal department and it made a strong impression upon first meeting. All these allies will not be too much to recharge the batteries of an Iron Man who is dying slowly: its palladium implant inserted in his chest, near the heart, her body makes every day a little more toxic .. .

The action and special effects abound, of course, in this sequel to the adaptation of a comic book of Marvel Comics of the 60s. But the director puts more emphasis here on feelings and weaknesses of the main character. Tony Stark is a glib seducer but the game sentimental cat and mouse with the two women around him shows that he feels very lonely. He also suffers from lack of love lavished by his father, too preoccupied with her business. And he fears he's invincible, death as everyone else.

Robert Downey Jr is subtle in how to express these different facets of his character. It is surrounded by an impressive cast, and among the newcomers the sexy outfits (dresses or shapers) Scarlett Johansson does not trump a Mickey Rourke at the top of his long hair, goatee, solid gold false teeth, tattooed everywhere, botox to death, but a sober yet tasteful in his role as villain in Russian accent you could cut with a knife. AP
 
That's one of those annoying reviews that is 80% synopsis but hey, at least it's positive.
 
Though yes, Google translater garbles it a little bit, what I like about that review is the sense that, despite the larger cast and grander scope, this is still very much Tony Stark's story and, if anything, Robert Downey Jr shines even more this time round than he did in the last film.
 
I can make sense enough of the review, in spite of the translation problems. It´s good to see once again the spectacle delivers, but doesn´t take center stage from Tony´s character development.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"