The Death of Batman (?!?!?)

[yenaled]

People have called him on his bull****ting many times, I know Buisek particularly has had a number of altercations with him.

 

[Diamondhead]

I guess now they are starting a whole new fad huh!
Every super hero will have to die and resuscitated to acquire their “Christ status”

The only good way for the bat to come back is to do it like the Spawn!
But wait it'll be a ripoff
A rip off ah tell you!

It amuses me to see those cretins trying to go around something ordinary to make it look great!

 

[Aristotle]

What part of "rumour" aren't you guys getting? He reports on what he hears, and lists them according to their varying degrees of truth. Sometimes they come to pass and sometimes they don't.

He reports on what he hears, and when traffic on his column slows down, he makes up a big ol' wad o' bull****.

 

[JackRembrandt]

He reports on what he hears, and when traffic on his column slows down, he makes up a big ol' wad o' bull****.

Proof?

 

[sethcohen]

proof is for people outside of america... here all we need are accusations and the will to act

 

[Aristotle]

Proof?

He's a rumor columnist. That's more than proof enough that he's a scumbag of the worst order. Just because his rumors are about comics doesn't make him any better than the next gossip ****head.

 

[JackRembrandt]

He's a rumor columnist. That's more than proof enough that he's a scumbag of the worst order. Just because his rumors are about comics doesn't make him any better than the next gossip ****head.

So basically, you're accusing him of making stuff up to make up for lagging traffic is a rumor. Unless you've got actual numbers to show, you're pretty much doing the same thing you're accusing him of: Making **** up.

 

[Aristotle]

So basically, you're accusing him of making stuff up to make up for lagging traffic is a rumor. Unless you've got actual numbers to show, you're pretty much doing the same thing you're accusing him of: Making **** up.

Why do you put such faith in these people? They are nothing but performers trying to pass themselves off as somehow useful to society. They are not journalists. They are liars and betrayers of confidence. They are, as people, less than you and I.

 

[JackRembrandt]

Why do you put such faith in these people? They are nothing but performers trying to pass themselves off as somehow useful to society. They are not journalists. They are liars and betrayers of confidence. They are, as people, less than you and I.

I never said they are journalists, and I never said I put faith in them. YOU on the other hand, said that they intentionally make stuff up for the sole purpose of increasing traffic to their websites. Now, either you can back that up with actual proof, or it exists only as a rumor. Making you just like them.

 

[Aristotle]

I never said they are journalists, and I never said I put faith in them. YOU on the other hand, said that they intentionally make stuff up for the sole purpose of increasing traffic to their websites. Now, either you can back that up with actual proof, or it exists only as a rumor. Making you just like them.

Statements like these are impossible to prove or disprove. That's when common sense comes into play. Who is he? He's a rumor columnist. What does that mean? It means he has the moral compass of Pol Pot on a bad day.

 

[Not Jake]

He says WB stepped in, so maybe you guys could consider that


I hate that some super-company can stifle creativity like that. I wish the Warner Brothers were dead

 

[Aristotle]

He says WB stepped in, so maybe you guys could consider that

He says that to cover his own ass! Why, I wonder, does he never cite the words of the actual HEAD GUY AT DC, who said killing Batman and making him a New God was a stupid idea? No, he makes up "behind the scenes" bull**** to make himself feel like he knows ****, and make his readers feel like they've got the "inside track!"

I hate that some super-company can stifle creativity like that. I wish the Warner Brothers were dead

Creativity is not inherently good.

 

[Not Jake]

(I know the Warner brothers are dead.)

 

[TheCorpulent1]

Haven't the WB higher-ups blocked major status quo changes to DC's bigger characters before?

 

[Not Jake]

He says that to cover his own ass! Why, I wonder, does he never cite the words of the actual HEAD GUY AT DC, who said killing Batman and making him a New God was a stupid idea? No, he makes up "behind the scenes" bull**** to make himself feel like he knows ****, and make his readers feel like they've got the "inside track!"

Creativity is not inherently good.

I still haven't seen the link to Didio saying anything about it

 

[Not Jake]

Haven't the WB higher-ups blocked major status quo changes to DC's bigger characters before?

I don't know. They let Superman become electric

You gotta pick and choose your spots, WB

 

[Aristotle]

I can't be bothered to look for it at the moment, but just look up the most recent Wizard World.

 

[Aristotle]

You gotta pick and choose your spots, WB

Yeah, and preserving one of their most bankable characters is a damn good spot to pick.

 

[Mee]

I don't know. They let Superman become electric

Superman's lame anyway.



Ohnohedi-n't!

 

[Aristotle]

Not a shocking thing to say, dude. That's like one of the easiest, safest criticisms of a comic-book character possible.

 

[JackRembrandt]

Statements like these are impossible to prove or disprove. That's when common sense comes into play. Who is he? He's a rumor columnist. What does that mean? It means he has the moral compass of Pol Pot on a bad day.

I don't know your point is, what with going on about the integrity (or lack of) of rumor mill operators. You made a statement without backing it up and I called you out on it. Case closed.

 

[Mee]

Not a shocking thing to say, dude. That's like one of the easiest, safest criticisms of a comic-book character possible.

Yeah.

 

[Aristotle]

I don't know your point is, what with going on about the integrity (or lack of) of rumor mill operators. You made a statement without backing it up and I called you out on it. Case closed.

Rumor mill operators are scum. Case closed.

Here's the difference between me and this *******: first, I'm right, even if it's not a factual-type of question. Second, I'm not abusing an influence on impressionable readers. I'm just talking.

 

[JackRembrandt]

You said they purposefully make things up to increase traffic. Where's the documented proof of that?

 

[Aristotle]

There can be no documented proof. It's not that kind of question.