The Incredible Hulk Gallery: The Official Pictures Thread

[Obi-Ron]

Avworthy!

 

[CGHulk]

http://img210.imageshack.us/my.php?image=vlcsnap3618617ad7.png


http://img520.imageshack.us/my.php?image=hulknew17nl1.jpg

 

[Kirmit]

My new favourite shot.

 

[superduperhero]

so....

i was messin' around with these images... and i think the reason both of these stills vary in distinction is because the first has a darker backround... i did some very quick photoshop... makes a difference to me...(if anyone still cares...lol)

oh.. mind the rough edges...

 

[Scooter]

No...

 

[superduperhero]

No...

damn scoot..... that was quick.....

guess not then....

 

[Scooter]

It's just that, darkening the background doesn't make the new Hulk look any better, assuming that's what you were trying to rationalize.

Besides, on the one hand you have what may not be an accurate representation of the Hulk from '03 (someone should crack out their DVD and make some serious 'caps), while, on the other hand, you have what may not be an accurate representation of the new Hulk (that shot might not be finished).

 

[Green Scar]

you don't have to darken that picture's background to make it look better. the new hulk is better looking by leaps and bounds.

 

[Scooter]

That's hyperbole! Blatant, worse-than-killing-babies-with-wood-chippers-and-then-kicking-old-people hyperbole! Damn you, hyperbolizer!

 

[Green Scar]

he's got *****-**** for crying out loud!

 

[superduperhero]

It's just that, darkening the background doesn't make the new Hulk look any better, assuming that's what you were trying to rationalize.

Besides, on the one hand you have what may not be an accurate representation of the Hulk from '03 (someone should crack out their DVD and make some serious 'caps), while, on the other hand, you have what may not be an accurate representation of the new Hulk (that shot might not be finished).

agreed.

i was just sayin.... i thought it made a difference.... cause the original doesn't seem to "pop" -lack of a better term...

all in all, who knows what we'll see opening day... maybe it'll be 3d.... and all up in yo' face action.... lol.....

hahaha either way i'm still watchin' it.

 

[Scooter]

he's got *****-**** for crying out loud!

Yeah, but they look like real.

 

[Green Scar]

but the owner of them looks awful!

 

[Scooter]

You killed our string playful e-banter. Way to go.

 

[Green Scar]

i'd say i'm sorry, but this:


looks SO MUCH BETTER then anything in ang's.

 

[Scooter]

No it doesn't. And stop apologizing.

 

[Green Scar]

i never apologized.

and yes, it does. stop defending crap.

 

[Scooter]

Lol?

 

[FrostBite]

For some reason I am becoming awkwardly entertained by this conversation..

 

[Scooter]

It's making the seat of my pants a bit damp, if that's relevant.. .

 

[I SEE SPIDEY]

For some reason I am becoming awkwardly entertained by this conversation..

Me too.

Both of them look like CGI monsters to me. AKA both look fake, but seriously folks I'm not going to judge a non finished product against a finished one. I'll say this though ILM did a good job with a crappy looking Hulk.

 

[webhead731]

he's got *****-**** for crying out loud!

It's a good CGI model but he's way too big.

 

[Judson Caspian]

His face is stupid in that film. He looks like a kid.

 

[GoblinWhirlwind]

The only time Hulk looked awesome was on the monitor, when the general was watching him before he flung that blast door through the wall.

 

[I SEE SPIDEY]

Okay boys. He thinks that ILM's Hulk looks better and others think differently. Nobody is wrong... yet. Because one movie is out for watching and the new one hasn't even come out yet.