Raiders 10/10
Temple 10/10
Crusade 7/10
Skull 7.5/10
Yes, that's right, I like Skull better than Crusade.
One of my favorite film series of all time. The hate for Temple is simply "WILLIE IS ANNOYING SO IT SUXXXXXXXX" which is really unfair. I can see why people find her annoying, but I think it's highly exaggerated as her whining pretty much stopped once the diner scene ended. After that she sort of begrudgingly goes along with everything with a "Well *****..." kind of attitude. I also think Kate Capshaw gives a GOOD comedic performance and her chemistry with Ford is spot on.
Everybody totes Marion up as this amazing female character and uses that as an attack on Willie. What does Marion do in Raiders, exactly? What does she do besides drink a man under the table and get captured with sass? All she does is talk smack, hardly the pinnacle of awesome female protagonists. I don't hate her or anything, she's fun but so is Willie. Both are entertaining in their own way.
Temple of Doom has the best score of the series, the best arc for Indy, the best cinematography, the most intimidating villain, and imo it's the most purely adventurous of the four. It takes place in mostly one location but it captures that serial feeling the character was meant for in the first place, the best. I also think the action is the most breathless and bombastic of the series. The whole last act is just a smorgasbord of awesome stunts and fights.
When someone says Indiana Jones, images from Temple of Doom pop into my head first.
Crusade is considered by many fans of the series as the best, even better than Raiders. I cannot see or understand why. People hate on sequels all the time for being copies of the first film but for some reason Crusade gets a pass. Skull is cited (negatively) as the most lighthearted and comedic film in the series. All I can do when this happens is think: "Do these people even watch Crusade?" Almost all of the action in this film has some slapsticky, comedic payoff that just isn't used as much in Raiders, Temple or even Skull. The opening scene is something out of a Disney film and the film is so tame it feels utterly safe and almost dull at times. It is safed by the skin of it's teeth by Ford and Connery carrying the film on their shoulders most of the time. If the tank chase wasn't a damn showstopper, I would say this the least exciting film in the series. Two action scene stand out. That's it. The boat scene and the tank scene. Everything else has this odd feeling of restraint. I often say you can almost see Spielberg recoiling from the accusations of Temple being too dark and violent with Crusade.
The plot and structure of Crusade is literally almost beat for beat lifted from Raiders. Another downfall is that the love interest and villain for Crusade are incredibly boring. Shockingly so. Villains were never this series strong suite but Belloq was at least charismatic, Mola Ram at least intimidating. Donovan and Elsa had no charm, wit, or personality at all. Hell, there wasn't even a good henchmen.
I know it sounds like I'm hating on Crusade, I swear I'm not. I do enjoy it but it's flaws always stood out to be more than any of the other films. If it weren't for Ford and Connery being AWESOME in it, some genuinely good humor and the tank chase I would say Crusade would have been a MAJOR letdown.
And now we get to Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. For my money, this is the most unfairly hated movie EVER MADE. It's perfectly in line with the rest of the series. You can whine about nukes and Prairie Dogs all you want, I don't see the big deal. Ford eases back into the character with noticeable relish, he has good chemistry with LeBeef, it's shot wonderfully and I for one loved the alien plot. It is no more stupid or less developed than any of the other plots. And what is with the hate for Blanchett as Spalko? She is the villain with the most screen time of the series and she is entertaining as hell. She's also written with just a bit more meat than any other villain. I liked her genuine curiosity and want of discovery. It wasn't just "MWAHAHA I'm evil give me the McGuffin!" The action in Skull is shot with more personality than most of the stuff in Crusade and the cinematography is great looking (I especially love the look of the civilization during the climax). Ya ya, the shot if Shia swinging with monkeys is a bad looking shot but I bet my freakin' paycheck if that was Indy on those vines it wouldn't get NEARLY the amount of hate.
Face it, the Indy movies have ALWAYS had implausibility and silliness. Justify it all you want, but how did Indy get on that U-boat in Raiders and not drown? How did Willie not melt or die from being lowered and raised over and over again in Temple? How did Indy manage to grab that ledge after the tank fell over the cliff in Crusade? How did they outrun a wall of water in Temple? Ya, a nuke is a big step up from a wall of water but I think it's safe to say if you get caught by a giant, rushing wall of water you are just as dead as locking closing yourself in a fridge to protect yourself from a nuke.
I don't think Skull is perfect. I hate the character of Mac and hate Ray Winston performance. I dislike Winston in general. I also see him acting if you catch my drift. I just don't think he's as great as people say he is. And yes, Marion's entry in the film feels wonky and a little forced but the banter between her and Indy and the chemistry help ease the sloppy introduction.