I have to make the difference: in no way the campy Batman TV series could be compared to the serious incarnation of the TV series pilot.
The references to the TV series were alright in TIH but what a Hulk movie really needs to rescue from the TV series is the serious tone and the loneliness of Banner.
Oh I agree that the Hulk TV show was, in general, better since it wasn't played campy and silly by comparison.
I'd say we've got that serious TV show, Banner-centric tone in BOTH movies actually. What we've never really gotten was more of the Robert Louis Stevenson type stuff that is ever so prevalent in the comics but was completely ignored in the old TV show. And I totally understand why they did that. Ferrigno really couldn't act beyond pure physical stuff and roaring all the time. So I'd like more Stevenson and less Mary Shelley please.
By R.L. Stevenson you mean to explore Hulk's personality as separated from Banner's?
Well, Ferrigno acted in one episode a role other than Hulk and he was eager to explore more himself as an actor. He asked many times to the creator/producer/director Ken Johnson for dialogue for the Hulk, but Johnson refused since it could result ridiculous (well in fact, Ferrigno didn't even do the roaring). Plus, the Hulk in that incarnation was supposed to be merely a giant angry version of Banner. It was Banner's body and mind deformed, not another separate character.
It was Banner's body and mind deformed, not another separate character.
This is the biggest problem with every live action version we've gotten so far.
Maybe because he didn't speak so much. But then again, what if too much dialogue really would've made him silly? The small amount of dialogue in TIH worked fine. But too much? I don't know.
Just say NO to silly 3rd-person speaking but YES to the Hulk being allowed to talk and be a complete character.
Then you obviously haven't read too many comics. Most of the time he begins, or finishes, every sentence with "Hulk".He's actually spent more time talking with some intelligence in the comics that he ever did with his 3rd-person type speech.
Then you obviously haven't read too many comics. Most of the time he begins, or finishes, every sentence with "Hulk".
Then you obviously haven't read too many comics. Most of the time he begins, or finishes, every sentence with "Hulk".
So TIH has been on Cinemax lately, and of course I tend to watch it whenever I run across it. It really is an enjoyable film, and part of that stems from its ties to the greater Marvel film universe. That particular element is something I'm looking forward to in the coming Marvel films.
On another note, I'm really curious to see if Marvel will make another Hulk movie. The ending is very open ended, and I know that Norton's draft of the screenplay was titled "Part I." Obviously he had at least one more part in mind.
To my knowledge, he and LL (and maybe Marvel) had three parts in mind. Norton has said that they left certain things out of TIH to explore in future installments. I envision that the psychological dichotomy of Bruce/Hulk will be included in this, much like the alcoholism of Tony Stark in IM2.
Definitely a fitting and memorable score. The Hulk's theme reminds me so much of the intro to the 1982 animated version - which is a very very good thing.
I truly believe they should bring the entire cast back. Norton is an absolute must. But ya know, another person who needs to come back to this Hulk series is Craig Armstrong. I find myself listening to his musical score of TIH everyday. That score was one of the best, if not the best of the summer. The three-note intro to the Hulk is a classic. I absolutely love the scores of the alternate opening, the opening credits, the campus scene and the final battle. It gives me chills.
The score is very underrated and unknown in my opinion.