- Joined
- Sep 14, 2008
- Messages
- 40,446
- Reaction score
- 6,223
- Points
- 103
Plus Spielberg came under fire about the choices of the film when in fact, Kubrick had those same choices in his writings of the film.
Plus Spielberg came under fire about the choices of the film when in fact, Kubrick had those same choices in his writings of the film.
Always a welcome this thread is.![]()
And you too. You reminded me of Kubrick's abandoned Napoleon project in the other thread. Damn, I would have killed to see that.
I agree.A marathon of his filmography sounds like a terrific idea.
Personally, the only one that feels like any sort of chore or endurance test to watch is "Spartacus," which I think has to do with the fact that even with Stanley at the helm, it doesn't quite feel like a Kubrick film given his having to answer to Kirk Douglas and that out of all his films, it was the one where he wasn't in full control of what the final result was going to be.
Plus that's a three hour film as well.
The difference being I'm more prone to sit through three hours of Kubrick ("Barry Lyndon") as opposed to three hours that don't inherently feel like he had control.
Speaking of Spielberg, the **** has he been up to? I've heard no news about Lincoln, Interstellar, or that pirate movie he wants to make.
**** STEVEN GET IT TOGETHER