Dr. Evil
Eternal
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2002
- Messages
- 58,398
- Reaction score
- 4,828
- Points
- 103
you can simulate matches in WWE 2k14??
how did Taker win?
Are you talking about Universe mode?
you can simulate matches in WWE 2k14??
how did Taker win?
Are you talking about Universe mode?
in general.
It sucks that Brock works so few dates. He needs to be on Raw tearing through 3MB by himself or breaking up a Santino/Khali/whoever "comedy" segment and destroying all of them at least a couple times a month, plus attacking whoever he is supposed to be feuding with. He doesn't even need to have "matches", but just be a physical presence. I feel like when he shows up every few months and loses half of his ppv matches, it doesn't mean as much.
Not really. In fact, Hunter Rider sums up my argument perfectly:
Should the streak end, it should be used to cement someone's ME status, not create someone's ME status. I see the suggestions as to who should end the streak, and frankly, I'm baffled. You guys want someone like Sheamus to end the steak, when Sheamus, as HR pointed out, is simply not over enough despite WWE giving him a full push?
Cena or Bryan are the two most credible options at this point.
Any streak-ending scenario has to be a balance between benefit and believability. I think a lot of posters here are focussing too much on the former, and not enough on the latter. Yes, Roman Reigns or Dean Ambrose would benefit greatly from ending the streak, but technically so would Santino or Brie Bella. All the up and comers in the WWE right now (Reigns, Rollins, Ambrose, Ziggler, Langston) are terrific, but story-wise they are not powerful enough to end the streak, and would have to rely on a lucky break in order for a win to make sense.
In terms of believability, the only active guys who fulfill that requirement are Cena, Punk, Lesnar, Triple H, Orton, Big Show and Bryan. And while Bryan is my favorite wrestler right now, I'd put a big asterisk next to his name on that list.
With a year of build, Reigns would be believable.
His character sucks, but his work ethic is incredible and has been the face of the WWE for almost a decade. He more than deserves his immortal moment.Cena or Bryan are the two most credible options at this point.Cement JOHN CENA'S main event status?
He's only been main eventer for ten years.
Cena - I am for this.In terms of believability, the only active guys who fulfill that requirement are Cena, Punk, Lesnar, Triple H, Orton, Big Show and Bryan. And while Bryan is my favorite wrestler right now, I'd put a big asterisk next to his name on that list.
Which is why Sheamus is the only other option. He has more to gain from it than Cena.Any streak-ending scenario has to be a balance between benefit and believability.
I see Reigns as being the next Cena/Hogan/Rock, but that's going to take more than a year, and he'll need to be at that Cena/Hogan/Rock level for a streak-ending victory to make sense.
See, when the WWE shoves all this social media crap down our throats why don't they use stuff like this? At least it's creative and funny.
Thinking about it, I say don't end the streak. There is too many ways it could go bad.
Okay it might take more than a year but if he's at Cena or Hogan's level, then I don't see the point in him ending it. Ending it should be the thing that puts him on their level.
WWE had better be ready to turn Cena heel after ending the streak. I can't fathom the reaction it would get. The streak is a big deal to a lot of people.
Since this is going to go on forever, can we talk about who would end Fandango's WrestleMania streak instead?
I say everyone.t: