Homecoming The Next Spider-Man - - - - Part 13

[Thread Manager]

This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]497285[/split]

 

[Thread Manager]

This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]497089[/split]

 

[Pecola1]

and What IF the two studios agree on Asa for the role? Aren't they resonable then? Don't they want someone who fits both PP and SM?

Yes, what if.

If they chose Justin Beiber to play PP/SM wouldn't they be reasonable? Y'know... because it means he would be able to play the role.
We can speak theoretical all day, but claiming that "If Marvel chose x they would be a good actor because Marvel would have made sure they would fit well" Means absolute nothing. It is literally setting up a hypothetical, then claiming that in your hypothetical, the things inside your hypothetical, prove that the things already stated in your hypothetical, somehow prove that outside your hypothetical it would work the same way.
Let me make this simpler: in RL if x = b we can know that b = a because b = a. In a hypothetical, x=y, so therefore in this hypothetical wouldn't y=a?
You are setting up a hypothetical in which the hypothetical would only take place if what you have stated is true. If Asa were a good actor, then Marvel would choose him. NOT the other way around. By saying Marvel chose Asa in your hypothetical you are already assuming that he must have been good enough for Marvel, and therefore he would play the role well, then you are asking whether he would be good enough for the role in this hypothetical.

 

[Parker Wayne]

They don't "need" to agree on who gets the role. At the end of the day Sony has final casting approval.

 

[Airwings]

They don't "need" to agree on who gets the role. At the end of the day Sony has final casting approval.

And Sony wanted Lerman (atleast before), right?

 

[Pecola1]

They don't "need" to agree on who gets the role. At the end of the day Sony has final casting approval.

Yes. ANd at the end of the day Sony knows that Marvel knows better than them when it comes to the best choice for a character they created, and when it comes to the best choice that will make most fans happy for the most revenue.

 

[XtremelyBaneful]

No, I won't approve

...so you're saying if o'brien is cast then no matter what, you will not accept it? you're interest in the potential spiderman mcu reboot is automatically axed?

I mean, I guess it's fine if you react that way but for me, since I want o'brien, if someone else is cast, I'll be disappointed, but there's nothing I can do about it so I just have to accept it and watch the guy do spiderman with the rest of marvel's superheroes.

 

[Airwings]

Xtreme: My interest will be pretty much zero then, yes. I will watch the other heroes, and rewatch Raimi/Webb films. Not the mcu Spidey.

But I don't have to worry. He won't get the role, he's too old.

 

[BatsDC]

This board is becoming unbearable.

 

[XtremelyBaneful]

Xtreme: My interest will be pretty much zero then, yes. I will watch the other heroes, and rewatch Raimi/Webb films. Not the mcu Spidey.

But I don't have to worry. He won't get the role, he's too old.

alright, well that's you. I guess there's nothing else to say about it.

 

[Jay Beezy]

Xtreme: My interest will be pretty much zero then, yes. I will watch the other heroes, and rewatch Raimi/Webb films. Not the mcu Spidey.

But I don't have to worry. He won't get the role, he's too old.

Would you ditch seeing Avengers: IW as well? Because he'd appear in those as well.

Point is, Marvel will cast who they cast based on what *they* see, not what you see. And with all due respect, if you won't see the new Spidey based on the sole reason that you don't like the actor, even if the actor gets universally praised as the definitive Spidey, that's just stubborn.

 

[Pecola1]

Would you ditch seeing Avengers: IW as well? Because he'd appear in those as well.

Point is, Marvel will cast who they cast based on what *they* see, not what you see. And with all due respect, if you won't see the new Spidey based on the sole reason that you don't like the actor, even if the Spidey gets universally praised as the definitive Spidey, that's just stubborn.

Couldn't've said it better myself!

 

[Airwings]

Would you ditch seeing Avengers: IW as well? Because he'd appear in those as well.

Point is, Marvel will cast who they cast based on what *they* see, not what you see. And with all due respect, if you won't see the new Spidey based on the sole reason that you don't like the actor, even if the Spidey gets universally praised as the definitive Spidey, that's just stubborn.

I don't want to backtalk any poster, but I know one guy here who will do the same if Liam Aiken is cast (with the studios change the upper age criteria).

 

[Jay Beezy]

I don't want to backtalk any poster, but I know one guy here who will do the same if Liam Aiken is cast (with the studios change the upper age criteria).

That guy is being stubborn as well.

 

[XtremelyBaneful]

I don't want to backtalk any poster, but I know one guy here who will do the same if Liam Aiken is cast (with the studios change the upper age criteria).

i think o'brien's got a much better chance of getting cast than he is, though.

 

[Shanio1]

Yes, what if.

If they chose Justin Beiber to play PP/SM wouldn't they be reasonable? Y'know... because it means he would be able to play the role.
We can speak theoretical all day, but claiming that "If Marvel chose x they would be a good actor because Marvel would have made sure they would fit well" Means absolute nothing. It is literally setting up a hypothetical, then claiming that in your hypothetical, the things inside your hypothetical, prove that the things already stated in your hypothetical, somehow prove that outside your hypothetical it would work the same way.
Let me make this simpler: in RL if x = b we can know that b = a because b = a. In a hypothetical, x=y, so therefore in this hypothetical wouldn't y=a?
You are setting up a hypothetical in which the hypothetical would only take place if what you have stated is true. If Asa were a good actor, then Marvel would choose him. NOT the other way around. By saying Marvel chose Asa in your hypothetical you are already assuming that he must have been good enough for Marvel, and therefore he would play the role well, then you are asking whether he would be good enough for the role in this hypothetical.

Sorry,but are you saying asa isn't a good actor?Because he is.May I ask what films have you see I him in?

 

[SlamAdams]

Let's not pretend who gets cast wouldn't/couldn't have some impact on individual anticipation level.

 

[BatsDC]

Let's not pretend who gets cast wouldn't/couldn't have some impact on individual anticipation level.

Of course. But it's stuff like people saying they would refuse to see the movie because of who is cast that is ridiculous.

 

[zizzy]

Xtreme: My interest will be pretty much zero then, yes. I will watch the other heroes, and rewatch Raimi/Webb films. Not the mcu Spidey.

But I don't have to worry. He won't get the role, he's too old.

This seems like a really extreme reaction to have, but I admit there are a few people who I would pretty much have that reaction to (notably Sprayberry and Elgort).

 

[XtremelyBaneful]

Of course. But it's stuff like people saying they would refuse to see the movie because of who is cast that is ridiculous.

but the thing is, if that's how strongly they feel about it, that's them. it shouldn't hinder how you or I go on about anticipating the movie. besides just knowing that people will react like their, their reactions alone should not affect how you will continue to wait for it.

 

[Airwings]

This seems like a really extreme reaction to have, but I admit there are a few people who I would pretty much have that reaction to (notably Sprayberry and Elgort).

Ansel Elgort as Spider-Man and the majority of the posters here will boycott.

 

[Pecola1]

Sorry,but are you saying asa isn't a good actor?Because he is.May I ask what films have you see I him in?

No. I don't think he is a perfect fit for SM though.
Great for PP, not as much for SM.
I was speaking in hypotheticals, so I said "if Asa were a good fit" not because I don't think he is a good fit, but to continue the hypothetical speaking.
(and yes, I meant to say "good fit" not "good actor" Asa is almost undoubtedly a good actor.)

 

[SlamAdams]

Of course. But it's stuff like people saying they would refuse to see the movie because of who is cast that is ridiculous.

I disagree.

 

[Pecola1]

Ansel Elgort as Spider-Man and the majority of the posters here will boycott.

I wouldn't mind him much.
Just all depends on how convincing he would play the role, and if he was chose then he must have fit well for the role.
Honestly, if they get a really good actor, I will go as far as buying the DVD, I don't even have CA:WS on DVD, so that's saying something, I will also probably watch it in theaters more than once. If they choose a ok actor or the movie is ok, I will probably rent the movie later, but I will likely only see it in theaters once. If they choose a bad actor and the movie is bad, I will watch it in theaters and won't rent it later. If the movie is HORRIBLE, then I will still have already watched it in theaters, but I wont watch it again.

 

[NotSoLongAgo]

You're not much of a fan if you'll really let the actor affect you that much