Wow...he sounds like kind of a d_bag.To sum it up, Devin Faradi is a self-loathing geek. Because of this, he continually singles out fans of superheroes as being far bigger losers than him, jabbing at them with his comments about them being "homo-repressed teen fantasists." He famously stated that the whole superhero genre should have been killed off with "Watchmen" and "Dark Knight Returns", because when those stories presented the genre as adult and psychologically complex, it was essentially the genre's death-knell, as superhero comics should NEVER be taken seriously as credible adult storytelling. This agenda has extended out to his view on superhero MOVIES, and in particular he has singled out Batman - the most serious and "adult" of mainstream superheroes - as an object of his hate.
Back at the time of the release of "Batman Begins", he controversially claimed that "Fantastic Four" was much better. Why? Because it didn't "get any ideas above its station". Namely, he thinks superhero movies should not aspire to be anything other than mindless, colorful kiddie fluff. Any film that does so is being "pretentious" and appealing to us loser comic fanboys.
Spoiler free review: http://sans777.wordpress.com/
Spoiler free review: http://sans777.wordpress.com/
To sum it up, Devin Faradi is a self-loathing geek. Because of this, he continually singles out fans of superheroes as being far bigger losers than him, jabbing at them with his comments about them being "homo-repressed teen fantasists." He famously stated that the whole superhero genre should have been killed off with "Watchmen" and "Dark Knight Returns", because when those stories presented the genre as adult and psychologically complex, it was essentially the genre's death-knell, as superhero comics should NEVER be taken seriously as credible adult storytelling. This agenda has extended out to his view on superhero MOVIES, and in particular he has singled out Batman - the most serious and "adult" of mainstream superheroes - as an object of his hate.
Back at the time of the release of "Batman Begins", he controversially claimed that "Fantastic Four" was much better. Why? Because it didn't "get any ideas above its station". Namely, he thinks superhero movies should not aspire to be anything other than mindless, colorful kiddie fluff. Any film that does so is being "pretentious" and appealing to us loser comic fanboys.

Spoiler free review: http://sans777.wordpress.com/

TDK will be the best comic book movie evah!
Spoiler free review: http://sans777.wordpress.com/
Just read Moriarty's review over at AICN, the section before the spoilers at least, and it was great. One thing that caught my eye was this
"Im not sure kids under 14 or 15 should see this film. For one thing, they wont understand a lot of it. I dont think moral ambiguity is one of the things kids look for in their movies. For another thing, the parts they do understand will probably scare the **** out of them. This movie pushed the PG-13 to the breaking point, and Im not sure how Warner Bros. pulled it off."
In this summer infested super hero season (or in some cases, simply men clad in colourful spandex), The Dark Knight is in another league to its contemporaries like The Incredible Hulk, Iron Man, Hancock and Speed Racer.
A new review...and has a couple of what I'd call minor spoilers (a plot point, etc):
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/film/article1365223.ece
No problem. Just when I find one from google search, it's already been posted in the other forum.Thanks, Voyeur. I'll add it to the front page.