Sith Scotti
Sidekick
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2010
- Messages
- 1,934
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
2.5 i out of 4 ain't good in my book . That means rental .
I think it pokes its head just above the 80% mark after a few more days.
I'm trying to remember the last time a movie had a lead character where he always chooses to do the right thing because it was simply the right thing to do. No angst, no thirst for revenge, no glory-hounding. It's kind of sad where having a simple good-guy lead is considered retro.
I'm trying to remember the last time a movie had a lead character where he always chooses to do the right thing because it was simply the right thing to do. No angst, no thirst for revenge, no glory-hounding. It's kind of sad where having a simple good-guy lead is considered retro.
69%...so close.
Suspense is killing me...
It is the content of the review that matters, not the rating.So Rolling Stone gave it a 2.5/4 and it's considered FRESH, when just a day earlier or so Slant Magazine gives it the same exact rating (2.5/4) and it's considered ROTTEN????
Am I missing something here?
Washington Post (very positive)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifes...tain-america/2011/07/21/gIQAJlDKSI_story.html
Also another positive from Milwaukee's Duane Dudek:
http://www.jsonline.com/entertainment/movies/125962468.html
It is the content of the review that matters, not the rating.
LOL Friends with benefits with the comeback from the bowels of 40%![]()
aaaand Roeper gives it a C
That's actually suprising. I thought for sure he'd like it.
aaaand Roeper gives it a C
That's actually suprising. I thought for sure he'd like it.
His complaints were Steve's blandness, cheesy dialogue, score and Atwell's acting?That's actually suprising. I thought for sure he'd like it.