I love how more people think Wally West is the better character, yet think Barry should get an origin movie. Lets not do another run of the mill superhero origin movie, make this film stand out. Do a flick about the Flash Legacy and include Wally, Barry, and Jay. Basic plot outline. Wally West takes over the Flash mantle from the deceased Barry Allen, under the guidance of Jay Garrick.
Jay Garrick is completely irrelevant to both Barry Allen and Wally West, and especially to Bart. He's as relevant as Alan Scott is to Hal Jordan, not that I wouldn't love to see it, but he does not need to be in a Flash movie.
And that sucks to just use Barry like that, as the "dead uncle" type character (we don't need another angst filled, vengeance driven character movie, BTW). I think you (and others) are completely unaware of just how important Barry Allen is, and what could be done with him in the DC movie universe before shoe horning Wally into his suit. A Flash movie shouldn't be about Kid Flash, dammit, it should be about
The Flash.
With that plot, you get the most The Flash who has the most character depth and has been fleshed out the best, yet Barry Allen is still important to the story. And Jay Garrick is there and can provide The Flash Legacy aspect. It's a frigging win win all around. Whats great is, you can portray Barry Allen is this larger than life, perfect hero, and now Wally West has to follow that, the film can mirror the comics. That would make good cinema if done right, better cinema than yet another basic origin story.
I agree that the sidekick dynamic is cool and has pros as well and should be done at some point, but it still works best with having the hero already well establsihed before passing the mantle. It gives the story much more weight and depth I think because the audience can relate to everything that's happening and can identify with the task at hand because they know that Wally has BIG shoes to fill, and that Barry was THE Flash, not just "some great hero" and can accept Wally as he accepts himself. So for Wally's sake, to tell the best Wally story, it is still better that Barry gets the movie first. But they still have to make the sidekick thing work, which no one has done to this day. At this point sidekicks are still lame and Wally's overall story as a sidekick only adds to that argument. Making it work on the big screen is going to take a LOT, I'm sure you'll suggest another retcon to make sense of it. Funny thing is, most the "retcons" suggested want to overlook Wally's career as the sidekick Kid Flash entirely, which is funny cuz (IMO) it really detracts from his character.
I understand what you're saying, and I agree that that is an interesting ideal as well,
BUT you get to tell one good story with that plot, it only works once. What happens after that? What else is there that differentiates the legacy character from the original once he gets past that "shadow" and that plot point is done other than being just some other name behind the hero's mask? And why do it with Wally? Especially when he ends up so much like Barry; he gets a secret identity again, marries a reporter, has a police job, gets a Kid Flash and Reverse Flash of his own, his wife gets attacked by said Reverse Flash (just like Iris West, Barry's wife did), gets an upped power level, has twins, add to that the fact that he's wearing Barry's suit and has a rip off of his origin to boot and all Wally really seems like is, ultimately, a whiny, less intelligent, weak imitation and rip off of brand Barry. And who wants to see that? Why not just settle for the real thing and use Barry Allen? The only thing "original" about him as The Flash is that he's the first sidekick to "fulfill the promise" and become the superhero. After that he's pretty much a Barry wannabe. So why not use that plot that you want to see on screen so much with some other character who is vastly different from their predecessor? Why not a Bucky Captain America movie? How about a Ryan Choi Atom film? Kyle Rayner GL? Even a Flash film where Bart Allen takes over for Wally West, all are ultimately more different than a Wally film where he takes over for Barry because
those characters are incredibly different than their predecessors. A really great place to showcase that story you want to see so badly would be in the Batman films; First, Bruce Wayne is sadly dead in the comics and someone else will be Batman, presumably one of the Robins (preferably Dick Grayson on my part), so depending on how long he stays dead, it would be synonymous of them to do this with the films, secondly, Batman/Bruce Wayne is already so well known and well establsihed that they wouldn't have to do a film series devoted to establishing him, and thirdly, Robin is well known, better known than The Flash and Kid Flash to say the least, so if done right, they'd have one helluva movie and it adds soooo much more weight to it, which uses the sidekick/legacy thing to its fullest potential with everyone well aware and identifying with the task at hand that Dick Grayson or whoever would have to face. Everyone knows who Batman is as I said so this would be the perfect place to do the "legacy" thing. So why do it with Wally? Is it because he was "the first" to "fulfill the promise", or maybe it's because you think he's the "definitive/iconic/'greatest' legacy character", that they should do it with Wally just cuz he's Wally? As far as the "passing the mantle/legacy" thing goes, they also did that with the *****fest that was the Phantom and will be doing it with the Green Lantern film, so it is out there.
The Green Lantern storyline is complex enough that it needs to be shown from the start of it all, with Hal Jordan.
So is The Flash.
The movie can be called "The Flash: Legacy".

Great idea. Let's introduce
EVERYONE, that's 50 + years of continuity in one movie to people who have no idea who The Flash is so it will be really confusing. duh.
Bottom line on why they should be using Barry and not Wally first:
Sidekicks are lame.
Having several Flashes in the first film and trying to introduce the character to new audiences isn't going to work. they won't care that there have been multiple Flashes if they don't care about The Flash, and how will they do that when they don't know which one to care for?
Wally West's story is lame and hokey.
The sidekick taking the mantle dynamic works for only one story and then Wally becomes a whiny, weak imitation of brand Barry.
Forensics are in. Wally doesn't even have a job.
We don't need another movie about a whiny hero or a vengeance driven one, and you know Wally would be both.
We don't need another movie about a hero who became a hero because of some big cartharsis someone's death caused in his life.
Wally as Flash in the first film is a three act origin story as well (like all superhero movies, come on!), only difference is it's more confusing and complicated.
Wally is uncompatible with the other DC characters who are getting films (Hal Jordan, origin, Batman, origin, JLA, etc), and if they bridge the films and do a JLA origin surely he cannot be Flash.
Using Wally to his best potential would be to do a Titans film before cramming him in The Flash suit.
It would be a nice change of pace to see amovie about a guy who is a hero because he likes comic books like us and knows it's the right thing to do as opposed to having some big in depth cartharsis that drove him to do it like
everyone else. Nice and simple, just like that.
Wally may have better characterization thanks to modern age writing but he doesn't have a "human side" like Barry Allen. Barry got superpowers when he was 24, he was an "average joe" most his life, albeit slow and dubbed "lazy". Wally had powers and was a hero for almost all of his life. Barry had to do a lot of adjusting and discovering and inventing when he became Flash, unlike Wally who was a hero for years but wasn't as smart as Barry so he couldn't figure out how to do all the things Barry did as Flash on hiw own.
There are other reasons but I won't go on cuz I have to go for the night. Cheers.
