For those unfamiliar with Shannon's work here's a clip from Revolutionary Road which gives some great insight into his brilliant acting.
[YT]8I-56Xyr0Bw[/YT]
Haha, you sly son of a gun...damn Robin...that actually sounds like a good idea for dealing with the last moments of Krypton. you should become a writer or something!!!
I think it would add a great level of irony to have the only thing that can kill Superman and his eventual greatest challenge to have been created by his own father.
Also, I'd rather Jor-El send Kal-El off not in an attempt to simply save his son, but rather as a contingency plan to eventually fight the forces that caused the demise of the planet Krypton (Zod and Brainiac). There could be a plan to have sent more, but Kal-El was the only one that made it safely....
I always found the idea of Jor-El being the ONLY one to save his son out of an ENTIRE planet a bit implausible. I'd also like Krypton to feel more like an entire planet than a single city. If Jor-El somehow had a small following who believed him that the planet was doomed and they all sent their children to colonize earth and eventually repopulate and save their race it would be a neat twist....think of the escape scene- seeing each pod taken out by heat, flame and meteorites as Kal-El is truly the only survivor! Great opening sequence right there.-R
This makes three of four castings that Snyder and company have nailed. Well done. I approve of Shannon's casting and think he is appropriate in both ability and looks to play a convincing General Zod. He'll do a superb job setting up the Kryptonian mythology and setting the stage for more villains to come. However, Zod being in the film is pretty much says that you can't believe anything out of Snyder's mouth until the casting/plot details are announced by the WB. I now believe Ursa is the female lead of the story, or at least will share the lead role with Martha Kent.
Couldn't disagree more with the sentiment that a Superman film needs to be "grounded in reality". Yes... if this were a Marvel film. But it is not, nor is it Batman. Superman should be larger than life and so should his villains. Kryptonian mythology has been a major stable of the comic, and an utopian Krypton and a desolute Phantom Zone are apart of that. Besides, there is nothing power-wise that Zod possesses which Superman doesn't. It's still Kryptonian powers, only with malicious intent. I also think a part of why Zod was chosen was because he's a foe that Kal doesn't have to hold back while battling. Snyder gets to do his big actions scenes now.
Those that wanted a new villain because Zod's been done before - I understand. I personally was caught off guard with Zod being one of the villains only because he was just used by "Smallville" last year. Didn't think the film franchise would go with Zod right out of the gate like this. It's a risk if it's too similar.
the only thing that can kill Superman and his eventual greatest challenge
I am pleased with the casting. But, I have a feeling that we haven't heard the last of it...
While Shannon is a great actor- I feel that they are and still will, get a "name" actor for a villain role. Be it for Lex Luthor, Metallo, Brainiac, etc... I think we are definitely going to get a Lex Luthor in this film (my gut tells me it will be Daniel Day Lewis, call it fanboy dreams, I say intuition) and I still think that they are going to have something else in store for us, villainwise. Zod is a huge threat, but I think they may be building a larger Kryptonian mythology/legacy and we may see another villain in this flick...
-R
Oh man. The more Kryptonian mythology the happier I will get! I love it when Superman packs in the sci-fi outer-spacey stories.
That's how I'd do it, lol.
Set up the background of the Kryptonian Civil War.
General Zod's forces against the Kryptonian High Council (including Jor-El). Brainiac corrupted in the process, betraying the High Council that created him and teaming with Zod (but still with his own agenda). Maybe in a huge twist, Jor-El and other scientists created a...um..."Doomsday" Weapon to stop Zod and end the war, but were unable to ever use it as Krypton was destroyed. Brainiac disappeared, as did the doomsday weapon, and Zod was in the Phantom Zone.
-R
All truly fantastic points. I commend you for your out-of-the-box thinking. I'd always wondered why such small portions of Krypton were portrayed. Granted it may not have been relevant to Kal-El's story, but it would help to round out an alien civilization rather than focusing on such a small (albeit important and highly populated) subsection of an entire culture and planet.I think it would add a great level of irony to have the only thing that can kill Superman and his eventual greatest challenge to have been created by his own father.
Also, I'd rather Jor-El send Kal-El off not in an attempt to simply save his son, but rather as a contingency plan to eventually fight the forces that caused the demise of the planet Krypton (Zod and Brainiac). There could be a plan to have sent more, but Kal-El was the only one that made it safely....
I always found the idea of Jor-El being the ONLY one to save his son out of an ENTIRE planet a bit implausible. I'd also like Krypton to feel more like an entire planet than a single city. If Jor-El somehow had a small following who believed him that the planet was doomed and they all sent their children to colonize earth and eventually repopulate and save their race it would be a neat twist....think of the escape scene- seeing each pod taken out by heat, flame and meteorites as Kal-El is truly the only survivor! Great opening sequence right there....
There are plenty of ways to tweak the mythology while still remaining true to the principle ideas, but keeping it fresh so that the audience will be guessing, even with a villain we've seen before- we can and MUST be offered a new take on those mythos to make it seem....exciting.
-R
, I could definitely see an epic scene featuring Kryptonian pods weaving through the galaxies, with only Kal-El left. It's like an action scene wrapped in tragedy, as you know how it all ends.that's cool. i've always wanted to work on a Superman comic book. maybe you and i should get together and try to get something goin'!Haha, you sly son of a gun...
I am actually working on a spec for a Superman flick--It's a 3 film story- includes some of these ideas--might just eventually post it as a fan script though. Just something I go to when I get writer's block on other things and kick it around....
I enjoy writing Lex, lol.
-R

But then Costner as Pa Kent?
Diane Lane is too young to play Martha.
Amy Adams is too old to play Lois to Cavill's 27.
And then this?
Sigh.
Which is exactly why he shouldn't be the guy for the first one. I know it hasn't been mentioned that much in this thread but it has been mentioned.
You cannot throw Doomsday into an origin story. No way you properly convey the Doomsday story in a half hour. Not only that, an essentially rookie Superman is certainly no match for DD; for that matter, a completely veteran Superman was no match for DD.
If they do eventually tell the story, I cannot see how you can tell it without either A. having a 3 hour movie or B. splitting it a la Harry Potter or Twilight. The fight, the death, the funeral stuff, the quad-return, etc.
If you're going to tell the story, tell it right. I think it'd be perfect if one movie ended with Lois and the death and the second one picked up with the funeral stuff.
Granted, that would be geared much more towards the fans than the general audience and financially that may not be something they think is a good idea.
I wasn't clear. I wouldn't want Doomsday for a origin or first flick either. I would just establish and hint at his existence in the first films, while building the Kryptonian mythology. I would save him for film 3.
My dream film sequence:
1- Lex and Brainiac
2- Metallo and Bizarro
3- Doomsday
Zod in flashbacks and his Civil War with the High Council spurs on most events of the films (Brainiac and Doomsday specifically).
-R