• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Comics The Official O.M.I.T. thread...

Oh, and I'm definitely pro-BND. I didn't love the mystical mumbo-jumbo that ended the marriage--I always thought that MJ should have gotten hit by a car or had some other decidedly non-super-hero-related demise. I thought that would have carried greated emotional weight than the business with Mephisto. I disliked the Other and the Totem, and all the other spider-mysticism.

I actually thought Pete's marriage to MJ was a far greater betrayal to my vision of the character than the alleged "deal." The specter of Spider-Man, Pete's responsibility should have kept him apart from marriage. He had a choice to use his powers and not live a fully "normal" life, or renounce those powers for a regular life. The tension of those choices provided a great deal of interest for me, and shaped Pete's character. Once he "had it all," (uper hero, married to a piping hot model actress) I just thought it was dull. Marvel couldn't age him or let him have kids (well, it COULD do that, but for economic reasons, there's no way it WOULD), so we'd see Pete stuck forever in marrage--a marriage which had gotten pretty stale because Pete and MJ couldn't really do the things normal married people do (age, have kids, etc).

With respect to Mephisto, however, Pete was trying to make things right--things he believed HE had screwed up. And he was willing to sacrifice something dear to him--his love for Gwen--erm, MJ--to save his Aunt. Yet, even so, he wouldn't do it without MJ's acquiescense. So, to me at least, that's a heroic act, even if it might have been a "bad choice." That is at least in character in a way his decision to marry MJ was not. Not to mention just what MJ represented--the quintessential party-girl, a model/actress, not even a fellow science student (Gwen) or a person of more humble origins and work (Betty or Liz). But hey, I understand others disagree with that view. It's just how I see it. So, I'm pro-BND, but I wish they had ended the marriage differently. If there had been an internet back when Pete got married, the younger version of myself probably would have been flaming these boards too. :)
 
Bias? How does that change YOUR statement:




And I don't see many pro-BND coming out in support of this issue.

Aloha,
If you've been married for over 10 years, you can talk all the macho BS you want to-your holding your wife's bag while she shops just like the rest of the married guys:cwink:.The whole point of OMD was that Mephisto HATED the love that MJ and Peter had for each other. To break that up was all the satisfaction M was looking for. Again, I agree with Meehaul, it was not the smartest decision but it was one done out of love for his wife and his aunt(mother).It was an act of desperation.As far as my statement- it was made to draw a distinct line between single men and how they think and married men and how WE think.You can substitute "basement" with any other room in the house you like:word:.Again, OMIT is an attempt at answering the questions brought about as the result of OMD. If you start from the premise that OMD was (in your words) CRAP.Then OMIT was CRAP before you ever picked up the book.
Spidey rules
 
Aloha,
If you've been married for over 10 years, you can talk all the macho BS you want to-your holding your wife's bag while she shops just like the rest of the married guys:cwink:.The whole point of OMD was that Mephisto HATED the love that MJ and Peter had for each other. To break that up was all the satisfaction M was looking for. Again, I agree with Meehaul, it was not the smartest decision but it was one done out of love for his wife and his aunt(mother).It was an act of desperation.As far as my statement- it was made to draw a distinct line between single men and how they think and married men and how WE think.You can substitute "basement" with any other room in the house you like:word:.Again, OMIT is an attempt at answering the questions brought about as the result of OMD. If you start from the premise that OMD was (in your words) CRAP.Then OMIT was CRAP before you ever picked up the book.
Spidey rules

Look, first of all, YOU were the one to say ONLY married men can understand it, single FANBOYS cannot. I was just pointing out I AM married and NOT a single fanboy and I do NOT think that makes Pete decision any more in character.

As far as thinking OMD was crap. Yes I did. Crap crap crap. And what I've seen on these boards, the biggest vocal supporters of BND thought it was crap too. It did not stop them from liking BND.

If you saw any of posts prior to OMIT, I said I was actually looking forward to OMIT. I wanted to see everything cleared up and actually had hope from here on into Origin of the Species. I have been beaten down by Marvel wanting a single Pete. I can't abide the Mephisto deal, and thought Loki paying back his debt to Pete and throwing in the marriage removal as a prank would have made this retcon easier to swallow.

But the fact remains I wanted to like this story. The execution thus far has been AWFUL.
 
Look, first of all, YOU were the one to say ONLY married men can understand it, single FANBOYS cannot. I was just pointing out I AM married and NOT a single fanboy and I do NOT think that makes Pete decision any more in character.

As far as thinking OMD was crap. Yes I did. Crap crap crap. And what I've seen on these boards, the biggest vocal supporters of BND thought it was crap too. It did not stop them from liking BND.

If you saw any of posts prior to OMIT, I said I was actually looking forward to OMIT. I wanted to see everything cleared up and actually had hope from here on into Origin of the Species. I have been beaten down by Marvel wanting a single Pete. I can't abide the Mephisto deal, and thought Loki paying back his debt to Pete and throwing in the marriage removal as a prank would have made this retcon easier to swallow.

But the fact remains I wanted to like this story. The execution thus far has been AWFUL.

Aloha,
ONLY was incorrect-Mostly would have been more accurate. :doh:But still, if you really wanted to enjoy OMIT, you would have to accept OMIT Chapter One Something Old, as the start of filling in the gaps of OMD.I've always wondered why folks were willing to accept Loki playing it straight and honoring his debt to Spider-Man but not being able to deal with Mephisto who has a longer history with Spidey than Loki and a much greater reason to HATE him.You say AWFUL! what parts of the story so far are you saying don't fit? Pete and MJ almost got married in 1987. Did they have hand size cell phones back then?
Because that's what MJ uses to call Peter with.
Now there's something you can get upset about.:yay:
Spidey rules
 
I don't need to say much about it, but if you're looking for people to point out if they support it or not just to prove we exist: I support it. :)
 
Lol this was so bad....I'm not shocked it was as bad as it was though. Maybe it was a bit worse than I actually thought it would be.

Great way to kick off this "huge" storyline Joe. Lol.
 
The only redeeming element of this issue (and maybe the others will rise to the occasion as promised; I don't know) was the notion of the ripple effect. One insignificant moment that changes the significant. It grounds cause and effect better than "we must go back and defeat the Skrulls to prevent this totalitarian future". The assumption that only the major events have the significance to change the flow of time for everyone is often a bit too grandiose. However the suggestion that Mephisto can see all possible paths of causality to know with absolute certainty of the paths created by changing the insignificant is laughable, even with his power levels. And why in the world would any of the aspects sit back and allow it? Mephisto's kind of fabric of time manipulation is almost certainly within their remit of grabbing their attention as it directly affects their existence
 
And I don't see many pro-BND coming out in support of this issue.

What a bunch of claptrap (I've been waiting a lifetime to use that particular phrase...)

What, we're not allowed to say what we don't like about a particular issue?

And didja ever think that people might be a little tired of hearing about supporting mystical abortions, and being JQ's lapdog, and justifying their all-consuming hatred of the institution of marriage, and all the other little girl whining every time they say they liked this or that in the title?

Over in another thread, there were posters saying things along the lines of "I can't WAIT for BNDers to defend this..." And then, when we're fair enough to point out what we did and didn't like, we're told we don't support it. What a weak way to make an argument.
 
I understand what Donald is trying to say... when you are in long-term loving relationships, on occasion, you do things that you're wife wants you to do even though you may not like it... it's a give & take thing when you are in a long-term relationship...

You'll notice I did not say anything about what happened in OMD, I am merely making the statement that men in long-term loving relationships understand what it takes to do something for the person you love...
 
Well this book came out two days ago and discussions on the story aren't really lighting the world on fire, and what's been said has largely been from luke warm responses to negative ones. With all the months of hype and the ads showing the Spider-Man and Mary Jane wedding cakes I think it's safe to say this story didn't mend the broken bridges Marvel hoped to.

So I wouldn't be surprised if there's discussions with editorial figuring out what to do next.
 
Well this book came out two days ago and discussions on the story aren't really lighting the world on fire, and what's been said has largely been from luke warm responses to negative ones. With all the months of hype and the ads showing the Spider-Man and Mary Jane wedding cakes I think it's safe to say this story didn't mend the broken bridges Marvel hoped to.

So I wouldn't be surprised if there's discussions with editorial figuring out what to do next.

Part 1 of 4. :whatever:
 
I just love how immediately things seem to have to go to a "us versus them" mentality. This thread is going to be so f'n fun. :woot:
 
I think Eddie Muerte is going to play a bigger role in this story...

:yay:
 
Come on. No one is gonna lose interest. Us people who enjoy Brand New Day will just swallow anything that is given to us, right? And all those Brand New Day haters just won't be able to stay away to watch that Devil Man, Joe Quesada, go down in flames. :oldrazz:
 
But you don't want to scare everyone off in the beginning. After part one came out it seems everyone lost interest.

I haven't... I still want to know about the reveal of his identity (more than anything else), and while I thought that Part 1 was rather sub-par (I like my art to be more consitant), I'm hoping it gets better in parts 2, 3 & 4.

:yay:
 
What a bunch of claptrap (I've been waiting a lifetime to use that particular phrase...)

What, we're not allowed to say what we don't like about a particular issue?

And didja ever think that people might be a little tired of hearing about supporting mystical abortions, and being JQ's lapdog, and justifying their all-consuming hatred of the institution of marriage, and all the other little girl whining every time they say they liked this or that in the title?

Over in another thread, there were posters saying things along the lines of "I can't WAIT for BNDers to defend this..." And then, when we're fair enough to point out what we did and didn't like, we're told we don't support it. What a weak way to make an argument.

Well said VC... :up:

:yay:
 
I think Eddie Muerte is going to play a bigger role in this story...

:yay:

He get's away during one of the flashbakcs or that's even the last time we see him during the story. Then he comes back in a later arc, we learn of other changes that were made below the surface due to him being free all this time, he gets himself on Spider-Man's radar and when they finally meet face to face we learn Peter had the face of the man who ruined his wedding etchedd In his mind. Then drama ensues.
 
I think Eddie Muerte is going to play a bigger role in this story...

:yay:


There's a clue in his name (Muerte) I'm sure. We'll have to see how it goes.

By the way, the Eddie in the Annual, and the Eddie in OMIT really look like quite different people. I like the OMIT Eddie better.
 
Well, from everything I've read and heard about this issue, I know I'm not going to like it. Personally, I'm not to concerned. I know people who like BND or whatever the hell we cal it now, and I particularly hate it.

My critiques on this issue are far from everyone else's. I personally think the inconsistency I've seen in the artwork is enough to ward off any interest some people would have in this arc. Also, Joe Q is not a writer. He tries, but it just isn't for him. I know he has his own personal axe to grind with this story, but there has to be a writer out there who wouldn't mind tackling this.

That being said, if anyone hated OMD, and a lot of people did, those same people are going to hate OMIT. I'm in that camp, so I'm going to politely say, "I hate this", and leave. Hating on TMoB, SIAT and Clones isn't going to change their opinions either.

On a positive note, how do you lure me back to the Spidey books? Try dropping that stupid 3X monthly shipping schedule and get a steady creative team on it, and I might give it a shot...

...wait.....they're doing that?!?! Well....get me a storyline that grabs me, and you never know what could happen! Believe it or not, I WANT to like Spider-man again...especially since lil' Gwen can now say, "SPIDEY!!!!".
:woot:
 
I understand what Donald is trying to say... when you are in long-term loving relationships, on occasion, you do things that you're wife wants you to do even though you may not like it... it's a give & take thing when you are in a long-term relationship...

You'll notice I did not say anything about what happened in OMD, I am merely making the statement that men in long-term loving relationships understand what it takes to do something for the person you love...

Well thanks for that. Everyone knows that n ANY relationship there's give and take. So you have to spend A DAY (Literally A DAY) in the mall while she hits every frickin' store and after 6 hours she walks out with a tiny bag's worth of stuff. So you have to spend an evening watching "The Bachlorette" or "Bridezillas".

And yeah, when you love someone you'd take a bullet for them.

But that has nothing to do- isn't even in the ballpark of Donald's using long-term relationships to justify the events in OMD. Again, no woman who loves a man would ask him to do something that he's completely opposed to.

Peter has spent his life- risked his life- in his battle against evil. To then ask him to surrender his will to the MASTER OF EVIL, is ridiculous. To do all of this simply because Peter and MaryJane couldn't accept that- people die is evil itself. To expect the Master of Corruption and Lies to be honorable is stupidity itself.

Now maybe Joe Q knows all about deals with the devil, since that's likely how he got his job at Marvel. But this doesn't change the fact that this is just another in the long line of examples (Totem, Sin's Past, The Other..) that reflect Joe's not getting Peter Parker as a character.

And as an aside, it's pretty tacky of Donald to throw the fanboy insult out at anyone not liking this . MOST PEOPLE, fanboy or not don't have longterm relationships. And many who do, aren't happy in them, but are merely digging their claws into each other in desperation for fear of being alone. So let's leave that kind of BS out of these discussions.
 
MOST PEOPLE, fanboy or not don't have longterm relationships. And many who do, aren't happy in them, but are merely digging their claws into each other in desperation for fear of being alone. So let's leave that kind of BS out of these discussions.

Yowtch!!! Dragon, we need to have a drink.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"