Knives122
Sidekick
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2005
- Messages
- 1,844
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Raiden said:Judging by the ****es that Will visited (who gave him a good face slap in return), Jack has many women.![]()
they are not ****es, they're wenches.
Raiden said:Judging by the ****es that Will visited (who gave him a good face slap in return), Jack has many women.![]()
The Riddler said:exactly.
will is the hero, jack the anti-hero.
TheVileOne said:So much for SHORTER movies making more money.
Screw X-men 3.
LastSunrise1981 said:I thought the LOTR Trilogy, Matrix Trilogy, Spider-Man 1/2, and X1/X2 completely crushed that theory already?![]()
![]()
![]()
According to the estimates it did. We'll know from the actuals on Monday.The Riddler said:did POTC2 cross $100 million in two days?
i've seen varying reports.
...........................and no one cared.SLYspyder said:LMAO! I just saw POTC2. OVERRATED!
It was a good movie, that's all it was. Nothing more. It wasn't as good as the first one, which means the opening weekend for the third one won't be as good. Even if the opening weekend from the third one beats $132M, SM3's opening weekend will still humble those numbers! Guaranteed!
After seeing the movie, I can now say that POTC2 is gonna be heavily frontloaded. $350M max.
Ask ANY kid in this world which movie they would rather see, POTC 3 or Spider-Man 3? They'll say SM3, guaranteed. I almost wish POTC 3, Shrek 3, and SM3 all came out on the same weekend so Spider-Man can massacer them and give them both the beatings they deserve for daring to step up as contenders.
Seeing as how SM1 made only $200 less per theater than POTC2, and it got released 4 years ago, taking into account rising prices and population and POTC2 was actually a sequel to a good movie and SM1 was not a sequel, it's a given the record will be be broken. I'm predicting a $160M. And that's just based on it being Sm3 alone and before factoring in Venom.