The Official PS4 Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
No, I don't. That's in the coding of the website I would assume, so only an administer would have access to that.
Oh, that sucks. I can't be the only one who finds it weird that it was changed. I don't even know what this new order is supposed to mean anyaay. I wonder if it's got something to do with the f4 forum getting axed
 

Industry
Sony Computer Entertainment now officially Sony Interactive Entertainment

Published 3 hours ago. 14 comments.

The new logo is very much the same logo.


SIE-Official-Launch_04-01-16.jpg




Following an announcement in January, Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. and its related companies in charge of the PlayStation business in each region have officially changed the corporate names to Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC. today.

  • Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. is now Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc. Its president is Andrew House.
  • Sony Computer Entertainment America, LLC. is now Sony Interactive Entertainment America, LLC. Its president is Shawn Layden.
  • Sony Computer Entertainment Europe, Ltd. is now Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe, Ltd. Its president is Jim Ryan.
  • Sony Computer Entertainment Japan Asia is now Sony Interactive Entertainment Japan Asia. Its president is Atsushi Morita.
Sony Interactive Entertainment’s corporate website URL will also change from scei.co.jp to sie.com.




Read More

Industry, SCE, SCEA, SCEE, SCEJ


source: Gematsu
 
yeah. and that's exactly what I don't want to happen.

even if there is a generous trade in incentive each time, I still wouldn't want to have to upgrade my console every 2-3 years.

if for nothing else, I don't want to have to keep backing up and transferring all of my games, saves, and apps every few years to upgrade.

I don't think the console gamer will let it happen. If Sony does this.. And there is a bigl difference between how games run
I can see this failing... And maybe taking PSVR with it.

It's a very slippery slope for them. Sony won back basically everyone they drove away and then some.. Turning into cocky *****ebag could and probably will hurt them. They should know this.
 
And I still say if the PS4K happens (it obviously is) we won't see the PS5 for six years. I think this is a way for them to really stretch the life of the PS4.
 
I don't think the console gamer will let it happen. If Sony does this.. And there is a bigl difference between how games run
I can see this failing... And maybe taking PSVR with it.

It's a very slippery slope for them. Sony won back basically everyone they drove away and then some.. Turning into cocky *****ebag could and probably will hurt them. They should know this.

And I still say if the PS4K happens (it obviously is) we won't see the PS5 for six years. I think this is a way for them to really stretch the life of the PS4.

yeah. it will be interesting to see how this all plays out and how Sony's customers ( and gamers in general ) respond.
 
Last edited:
I don't think the console gamer will let it happen. If Sony does this.. And there is a bigl difference between how games run
I can see this failing... And maybe taking PSVR with it.

It's a very slippery slope for them. Sony won back basically everyone they drove away and then some.. Turning into cocky *****ebag could and probably will hurt them. They should know this.

mS were the ones who mentioned it first. if they did it and sony didn't do it that would put them in an odd place too. btw, everything we've heard about the Ps4K has been from 3rd party sources, sony themselves still haven't said anything about it.
 
I'm sure the PS4K is happening but the level of gimping of the standard PS4 has been overstated or overspeculated on by the usual overreacting kids on that website.
 
I'm sure the PS4K is happening but the level of gimping of the standard PS4 has been overstated or overspeculated on by the usual overreacting kids on that website.

overreacting on the internet??!!

I'm shocked.......shocked I tell ya!!!

:o

:oldrazz:
 
mS were the ones who mentioned it first. if they did it and sony didn't do it that would put them in an odd place too. btw, everything we've heard about the Ps4K has been from 3rd party sources, sony themselves still haven't said anything about it.

I'm sure Sony will say something at E3.
 
Last edited:
I'm sure the PS4K is happening but the level of gimping of the standard PS4 has been overstated or overspeculated on by the usual overreacting kids on that website.
people are overreacting to the news the 3rd party sources are giving out. if there's someone to blame for it, it is them (if most of it is untrue).
 
Yeah. Bisch certified guys are saying "large differences" and "sacrifices being made."
 
The guy already edited his post and said the posters were focusing way too much on the word sacrifice. He means sacrifice in the same way that every non-pc version of a game is 'sacrificed' in that it doesn't run quite as well. Doesn't mean they don't run as well as possible on PS4, X1 etc.
 
The guy already edited his post and said the posters were focusing way too much on the word sacrifice. He means sacrifice in the same way that every non-pc version of a game is 'sacrificed' in that it doesn't run quite as well. Doesn't mean they don't run as well as possible on PS4, X1 etc.
what does it mean then? if it means games will have better graphics on the Ps4K than the Ps4, then that means it is running better on Ps4K as far as I'm concerned.
 
what does it mean then? if it means games will have better graphics on the Ps4K than the Ps4, then that means it is running better on Ps4K as far as I'm concerned.

Yes but that isn't the same as a sacrifice, where the PS4 is running any worse than it would be if the PS4K never existed.
 
Yes but that isn't the same as a sacrifice, where the PS4 is running any worse than it would be if the PS4K never existed.
but the reality is that Ps4K does exist and will create this scenario.
 
but the reality is that Ps4K does exist and will create this scenario.
I don't think you understood. My statement is assuming the PS4K will come out but that the PS4 will play games in the same way with no sacrifices, as if the PS4K hadn't come out. In all cases the statement is assuming the PS4K will come out.
 
I don't think you understood. My statement is assuming the PS4K will come out but that the PS4 will play games in the same way with no sacrifices, as if the PS4K hadn't come out. In all cases the statement is assuming the PS4K will come out.
No I understood, and I disagree. The sacrifice that's being made is taking away the satisfaction the 40 million+ owner install base has of owning their console, because there is a better version of the same console that can be owned that will run the game better.
 
No I understood, and I disagree. The sacrifice that's being made is taking away the satisfaction the 40 million+ owner install base has of owning their console, because there is a better version of the same console that can be owned that will run the game better.
Haha, you just used the word sacrifice to a situation (towards people's satisfaction) that neither the leaker nor all the complainers in that thread are talking about. My feelings will be sacrificed too when the PS4K comes out as the letter K will be all over the games section and I have a slight allergy to it. :csad: Shall we talk about that sacrifice too?

The only sacrifice that anyone apart from you is talking about is the theoretical sacrifice to PS4 game performance (not people's satisfaction) that might happen when the PS4K comes out which the leaker himself has now cleared up (he should have just used a different word).

Also if you understood that my statement assumes that the PS4 will come to exist and create this scenario where there is an allegation but not necesarily a reailty that performance (not feelings) might be sacrificed, I don't think you 'd start your response with "but the reality is that Ps4K does exist".
 
Haha, you just used the word sacrifice to a situation (towards people's satisfaction) that neither the leaker nor all the complainers in that thread are talking about. My feelings will be sacrificed too when the PS4K comes out as the letter K will be all over the games section and I have a slight allergy to it. :csad: Shall we talk about that sacrifice too?
I am in that thread bro, I saw what's going on there

The only sacrifice that anyone apart from you is talking about is the theoretical sacrifice to PS4 game performance (not people's satisfaction) that might happen when the PS4K comes out which the leaker himself has now cleared up (he should have just used a different word).
No, that is a sacrifice in and of itself, because this very news kills my satisfaction. As I've said numerous times here and on the GAF, if this turns out to be true, I will give up playing video games altogether.

Also if you understood that my statement assumes that the PS4 will come to exist and create this scenario where there is an allegation but not necesarily a reailty that performance (not feelings) might be sacrificed, I don't think you 'd start your response with "but the reality is that Ps4K does exist".
fair enough, you got me there
 
He said "Considerable" sacrifices. I wouldn't care so much for sacrifices.. But.. Considerable? I think that's kind of a tell..
 
I am in that thread bro, I saw what's going on there

No, that is a sacrifice in and of itself, because this very news kills my satisfaction. As I've said numerous times here and on the GAF, if this turns out to be true, I will give up playing video games altogether.
I know you guys are. That's what made me go over and read it!

I know it's a sacrifice! Just not the sacrifice the debate is about. That's why I used a stupid example of another sacrifice that the debate isn't about lol (my allergy to the letter K!). The leak mentions that PS4 game performance might be sacrificed (which was later cleared up if you read his edit) and that is what has caused this reaction.

Anyway better to stop with all these semantics now.

I'm genuinely sorry if this ends up negatively affecting you and others but I'd wait and see as the leaker himself is suggesting people have got the wrong end of the stick.

fair enough, you got me there
:yay: It's all good.
 
I know you guys are. That's what made me go over and read it!
Huh? Who else are you talking about?

I know it's a sacrifice! Just not the sacrifice the debate is about. That's why I used a stupid example of another sacrifice that the debate isn't about lol (my allergy to the letter K!). The leak mentions that PS4 game performance might be sacrificed (which was later cleared up if you read his edit) and that is what has caused this reaction.
Ohhhhhhhhh I see. So it's like the sacrifices needed to be make like, how in Me3 because of the split RAM of the Ps3, a lot of sacrifices had to be made to the game as a whole because of that, which limited the other platforms.

Anyway better to stop with all these semantics now.
Yeah, I kinda made that a stretch but I get it now.

I'm genuinely sorry if this ends up negatively affecting you and others but I'd wait and see as the leaker himself is suggesting people have got the wrong end of the stick.
Don't be sorry, it's not your fault. There are undoubtedly people excited about this but there are people who are livid as hell, too.


anyways yeah, he is doing a bit of damage control so all in all I hope this is bs.
:yay: It's all good.
200.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"