Octoberist
point blank
- Joined
- May 13, 2005
- Messages
- 46,465
- Reaction score
- 15
- Points
- 33
Im trying Godman,but really struggling to understand your point or your logic.
From the above, it sound like you are saying if the origin had been shown as the Ang Lee origin, that this film would be a perfect sequel to the Ang film, does that mean you found the film perfect barring the origin? If so, I commend your turnaround, as it looks like thats what you are saying.
"if u had used 2003 Hulk's movie summary as the opening sequence to this one it would have fit perfectly as a sequel and replace the initial actors and it would have been an EXACT perfect sequel with maybe only one or two minor continuity probs."
That statement says that if they used the same actors and origin, this film would be a perfect sequel to the first film. Which would mean that the way they handle everything in this film, from story to CGI to character development would be perfect for a sequel to Ang Lee's film? Thats what you have just implied.
Think about this though, if there was no Ang Lee version, and this was a completely first approach, would the film have made sense? If someone hadnt seen Ang's, to me, this film would stand alone,so could be seen as a reboot OR a sequel if you wanted - they set up everything here plainly and simply, the forelorn love between Betty and Bruce is apparent and nuanced throughout the film.
Everything you mention in this one, barring the set piece in Brazil, could be attributed to any jumping on point from the first episode of the tv series, orthe first issue of the comic, or yes, the first film, thats the whole point - to move swiftly through an origin, indicate a love that cannot be between them, and a search for a cure, for himself, and for Bruce to be with Betty. All of that was in the movie, simply and at times poetically.
Im amazed you feel the film has no backbone and that the relationship sucked in this film - particularly as it has the origin clearly laid out within 5 minutes and having a transformation within that origin, as opposed to 45 minutes before a transformation takes place as in Ang's. And while I liked the relationship in Ang's, Banner's detachment emotionally made me surprised he even went out with Betty at all, that she put up with his emotionally stunted behaviour at all.
If anything, the romance here goes beyond Ang Lee's - which went as far as for the couple to ultimately realise they could not be together because of the Hulk, right at the end. Whereas in the new movie, thats happened years ago, Banner left at the very beginning of the movie to get away from Betty because of his infliction, had to come back and then you see the awkwardness between the two because they so want to be together, even after all those years, there love is bubbling ever so close to the surface but their inability to express how they feel, or the safety of not doing so, causing the uncomfort before they give in and the love takes control in the scene where they are about to have sex.
I know there are a few opinions on the performances here, but if anything the script and actors show a much stronger connection between Bruce and Betty in this film, taking it much further than Ang's despite the inevitable outcome that Bruce must leave again for both sakes.
Thats just opinion of course, as usual. But I am finding your views fascinating and amusing at times.
I think Devin of Chud.com (i love the site, but meh on him) said it best: The Incredible Hulk felt like a sequel to a movie that never existed.
Because of that, the love angle between Betty and Bruce feels weird. a little disjointed because this is not the same (for the most part) betty and bruce from Ang Lee's Hulk. They 'could' have connected it better, but it probably wouldn't matter anyway.