Homecoming The Spider-Man Skepticism Thread

[Webhead2006]

Well we already know from freige they want humor right. I am sure they will balance drama, serious moments right with the right amount of humor. No different they say thor, cap, ironman films.

 

[UltimateMarvel]

I'd say the same tone of humor they used in Ant-Man.

 

[Ghostcrow13]

Well we already know from freige they want humor right. I am sure they will balance drama, serious moments right with the right amount of humor. No different they say thor, cap, ironman films.

Are you sure, they didn't get the balance right with TDW, IM3 or AoU in my opinion.

Of course Spidey needs humor due to his character, however hopefully there aren't stupid side characters making terrible jokes, or jokes in appropriate places.

 

[LizardMan07]

The more humour the better, humour>story

 

[UltimateMarvel]

I agree. Spider-Man doesn't really need a really deep and complex plot. We need more humor.

 

[harryoscop]

I agree. Spider-Man doesn't really need a really deep and complex plot. We need more humor.

I think he was being sarcastic, lol.

And I disagree about the humor. The tone in Ant-Man worked for that film because it was trying to be a parody of itself (At least that's what it seemed like). I really don't think Spider-Man should be a parody/comedy film.

I think the tone in Amazing Spider-Man 2 is right for an MCU Spidey flick, OR, if you want to use one of Marvel's own films as an example, I think Captain America First Avenger is the right tone for Spider-Man.

 

[Webhead2006]

I doubt they have spidey be a parody. I see him more like ironman and how the avenger films handled humor elements. Also like I commented days ago in this thread. We know feige has talked about how the past filma never hit the right mark on spider humor and what not. So I think they will hit it right. It's not like it be usm toon style.

 

[PeterBenParker]

I think the tone in Amazing Spider-Man 2 is right for an MCU Spidey flick.

Exactly.

TASM2 -- for better or worse (depending on if you liked it or disliked it) -- felt like a COMIC BOOK movie and that's what I'd love to see from any Spider-Man film moving forward, to be quite honest.

 

[Webhead2006]

Ya they where getting to humor stuff there like wholenopening scene. As for story and quality of jokes might not been bedt. But they where heading in right direction.

 

[ernesth100]

Only tni g wrong with TASM2 is that there was too much going on at once. Other than that I'd gladly except of film of that tone in the MCU.

 

[Poppy]

My worry lies definitely with the writers. It's so easy to do too many puns in one movie or even too much humor.
Also I watched 'Vacations' and it was fo sure, one of the worst comedy i've seen. I don't trus the writers at all now ))

 

[AvegningSpider]

And i watched Horrible Bosses, not a bad movie and quite fun. I do trust them.

 

[Webhead2006]

again the writers are not the be all end all issue for a film. Plus like i brought up before they had to come up with a solid story/plottline marvel liked. Plus also marvel has to ok the scripts and drafts and all. Plus also there is the possibility that before the film starts filming other writers be it marvel in house guys or some other screen writers could come in and polish up the script.

 

[ernesth100]

Oh please just have faith and let wht happens happen.

 

[PeterBenParker]

If I had to have skepticism, it'd be that a lot of this is seeming like early TASM days. Indie director, hit-or-miss writer(s), relatively unknown as the titular hero, bigger name for a supporting role, emphasis on high school, etc. etc.

Only difference this time is Lord Feige is involved and bless us all as this will immediately get 90+ on RT.

Nah, I really don't have anything to be skeptical about yet -- just not all that interested due to lack of news. 'Least Civil War is only a few months away!

 

[Poppy]

Oh please just have faith and let wht happens happen.

It's called " the Skepticism Thread".

 

[Webhead2006]

again for me i would only be worried if we where hearing things of the ascript not up to snuff and what not. As we havent really heard anything on that. Plus there is still plently of time that script can be rewritten or polished up by other writers. Heck look at almost all the spidey films or even most of the mcu films. The first writers are usually not the ones at the filming script who have there names on the script or is credited.

Really if marvel didnt like the writers they likely would have gone with someone else. Plus things have to go through the marvel guys to be oked and all that like i have said before. Plus also look at the writers of mcu films or even the directors most of them have a few so so films under there resume. So just cause this film was so so doesnt mean there next film cant be a lock.

 

[Jeight]

I can totally understand being iffy bout the writers on the one hand. Vacation was horrible. On the other hand so were the Scooby Doo movie and Gunn wrote those. Half of Reed's movies are not very good yet he delivered a great Ant-man movie. You, Me and Durpee is marginally better than Vacation. Marginally. I think we all know who made that movie.

Do you spot any similarities in all those cases? All MCU directors and all of them delivered great films. Feige is know for his eyebrow-raising choices in filmmakers or writers. It's not the first time. More than anyone else Feige knows in what shape Spider-man is right now. One of his favourite movies is Spider-man 2 so he knows what a great Spider-man movie looks like. I'm not saying that the reboot will be on THAT level, it's almost impossible, just saying that for those guys to take the job they must have a turned a killer draft since the character can't afford another misstep.

 

[AvegningSpider]

Wasn't Feige involved in SM2. Because if so, then the new franchise is definetly being good.

 

[Jeight]

Wasn't Feige involved in SM2. Because if so, then the new franchise is definetly being good.

He was involved in many cbms of the past decade mostly because of his extensive knowledge of the Marvel universe. Truth is though that he was just an executive producer and he was only the consultant. He started as the intern of Shauler Donner in the first X-men movie and he was upgraded when the producers were impressed by his Marvel expertise.

The only franchise he has absolute power upon is the MCU.

 

[Webhead2006]

Ya like I jeep saying if feige didn't like what the writers had they wouldn't been picked. Plus again who knows if any one else like watts or a marvel in house guy will be doing a draft or polish to script before it becomes locked in as filming script.

 

[Doctor Octopus]

Wasn't Feige involved in SM2. Because if so, then the new franchise is definetly being good.

He also say Spider-Man 2 is one of best superhero films so that also good.

 

[JOE]

Marvel is taking notes on how successful quipping can convert into mega dollars. Deadpool will have an influence on Spider-Man's humor, quote me on that.

 

[Webhead2006]

i doubt deadpool really has any change to spidey as they probably already had script ideas and ploted out and prior to deadpool release a week ago likely already had a few drafts done. Seesh its not like deadpool being a success is going to change things. We already know marvel wanted to focus less on love life, more on the dual life and how that affects both sides of spidey and peter. Along with they wanted to get humor right as the past two film series been lacking in the humor spidey department.

 

[Shanio1]

Marvel is taking notes on how successful quipping can convert into mega dollars. Deadpool will have an influence on Spider-Man's humor, quote me on that.

Not too much though ... nothing past PG-13

But maybe more of this (Imagine Tobey x5)
[YT]watch?v=Efe2tRGdYTg[/YT]