kiuju2k
Civilian
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2005
- Messages
- 735
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
f Juggernaut's powers come from magic, it means he could BEAT SUPERMAN!!!
I have those books. Juggernaut jobbed out to superman just like the hulked did.
f Juggernaut's powers come from magic, it means he could BEAT SUPERMAN!!!
Yeah, but that's entirely theoretical science. That essentially makes it no more realistic than a writer having the Hulk punch through time "'cause he's the Hulk, duh." Plus, I'm thinking that even quantum tunnelling states that it's really, really, really HIGHLY mathematically improbable for a human being to spontaneously turn into a chair or for anyone to punch through time.TheSumOfGod said:Ever heard of "quantum tunnelling"? It's a new theory essentially stating that a human being could turn into a horse or a chair at any time for no apparent reason simply because NOTHING is "impossible", but simply "mathematically improbable". If it's possible for Hulk to exist, then it's possible for him to punch through time and space when he gets super-pissed off. And have you ever considered the idea that "magic" isn't some irrational, mystical force, but rather a misunderstood phenomenon of quantum physics? "Hyperspatial manipulation", perhaps?
ScarletSpider said:Someone differs in opinion to you so you throw your rattle out of your push chair? grow the hell up.
A few points from the resident physics Ph.D. candidate:TheSumOfGod said:Ever heard of "quantum tunnelling"? It's a new theory essentially stating that a human being could turn into a horse or a chair at any time for no apparent reason simply because NOTHING is "impossible", but simply "mathematically improbable". If it's possible for Hulk to exist, then it's possible for him to punch through time and space when he gets super-pissed off. And have you ever considered the idea that "magic" isn't some irrational, mystical force, but rather a misunderstood phenomenon of quantum physics? "Hyperspatial manipulation", perhaps?
Hahaha, thanks. I was hoping you'd stop by this thread at some point. That's basically what I was getting at earlier, I just didn't know all your sciencey jargon for it.XFanTim said:So, in principle a bunch of particles could go from one configuration to another due to probabilistic effects. But when we're talking about this happening for all the particles in a macroscopic object (in other words more than billions of billions of particles) it is not only "improbable", but ludicrously, absurdly, ridiculously improbable.
TheSumOfGod said:![]()
LOL, it's funny that you choose a picture from the comic he died in. Taken out by Gambit LOL
yes he did.B.U.M. said:he didnt die in that comic