Mystirious
Avenger
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2010
- Messages
- 25,351
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Never seen lamb hearts in a supermarket before I'll have to try those 
I've sent this to Matt. Would appreciate some feedback.
I just wanted to voice my thoughts on your proposed Infraction Removal Process. I find the entire system to be similar to that of a pile of horse ****. How often is a poster perma-banned from the 10 infraction rule, I wonder. So often that the process needs to be automatic and there isn't time for Mods to review each ban before making it official? making this a case-by-case process seems overly complicated. I've been on this site for over 8 years now. I'm really supposed to be held accountable for things said back in, say, 2004? These infractions should expire automatically, and if not, their accumulation should certainly not lead to an automatic perminant ban. Suspencion I can understand, but to ban posters with such loyalty that they return to the site year after year? I disagree with any such policies that lead to these injustices.
While we're on the matter, you should truly reconsider the permanent ban of Black Lantern. He's missed by many and his absense makes the Hype! a dark, lonely place.
I've said my piece. Good day.
-WompuM
And Stephen Fry as Mycroft! 
Brilliance
t:I've sent this to Matt. Would appreciate some feedback.
I just wanted to voice my thoughts on your proposed Infraction Removal Process. I find the entire system to be similar to that of a pile of horse ****. How often is a poster perma-banned from the 10 infraction rule, I wonder. So often that the process needs to be automatic and there isn't time for Mods to review each ban before making it official? making this a case-by-case process seems overly complicated. I've been on this site for over 8 years now. I'm really supposed to be held accountable for things said back in, say, 2004? These infractions should expire automatically, and if not, their accumulation should certainly not lead to an automatic perminant ban. Suspencion I can understand, but to ban posters with such loyalty that they return to the site year after year? I disagree with any such policies that lead to these injustices.
While we're on the matter, you should truly reconsider the permanent ban of Black Lantern. He's missed by many and his absense makes the Hype! a dark, lonely place.
I've said my piece. Good day.
-WompuM
no.
there are so many people that deserve to come back before him. he broke every rule, and said **** that he got away with that most others wouldn't have gotten away with. he obviously didn't learn his lesson. if they bring him back they have to bring back everyone.
kayvan kovak is awesome. He was great in four lions.
Rubber Dingy Rapids Brot:

I've sent this to Matt. Would appreciate some feedback.
I just wanted to voice my thoughts on your proposed Infraction Removal Process. I find the entire system to be similar to that of a pile of horse ****. How often is a poster perma-banned from the 10 infraction rule, I wonder. So often that the process needs to be automatic and there isn't time for Mods to review each ban before making it official? making this a case-by-case process seems overly complicated. I've been on this site for over 8 years now. I'm really supposed to be held accountable for things said back in, say, 2004? These infractions should expire automatically, and if not, their accumulation should certainly not lead to an automatic perminant ban. Suspencion I can understand, but to ban posters with such loyalty that they return to the site year after year? I disagree with any such policies that lead to these injustices.
While we're on the matter, you should truly reconsider the permanent ban of Black Lantern. He's missed by many and his absense makes the Hype! a dark, lonely place.
I've said my piece. Good day.
-WompuM



He rejected Morgs advancesBL got banned?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
What did he do?
![]()
![]()
![]()
t:


