dude stannis
Avenger
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2003
- Messages
- 17,099
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 31
If this hits, can we get a Hawkgirl/man from the Wachowskis?
WB has pushed the film up a week, it'll now open July 18, 2014. The same mid-July date that's been a good-luck for WB since 2007.

this is the first 3D movie for them. hmmm interesting. i dont think i read if they filmed with 3D cameras.
True...In most cases.
However....Pacific Rim![]()
If this hits, can we get a Hawkgirl/man from the Wachowskis?
Pacific Rim made more than 4.07M worldwide, it broke even. It's not like only money from American Boxoffice counts.
True...In most cases.
However....Pacific Rim![]()
breaking even's only a goal when you're in the hole.
is it just me or is this the least convincing, most underwhelming end-trailer yell in ages, courtesy of Tatum? instead of "JUPITER!!!!" you get something more like "Jupiter..."
I think people have different ways of expressing feelings. For example, some people cried loud when then lost someone dear to them, some people remained silent. The same thing here. So the cry has to be loud to be convincing? Just for the sake of being dramatic?
Tatum is incapable of expressing feelings though.
Tatum is incapable of expressing feelings though.

I thought he was great in 21 Jump Street, though.
Yeah, he was pretty good in that, but the part mostly called for him to just look stupid and act confused.
I have a theory why we root for Channing:
He's like the jock who wants to become an opera singer. It's weird because he has the right looks of a typical American actor, but there's many of them so who does one stand out? It seems that Channing is aware of that, so it does seems like he is pushing himself to be..more then what he is sometimes. And I think people admire that. If you look at his resume, he has done many indie movies.
Any other actor of his caliber would've been stuck doing dance movies all their life, but not Channing.
How is it prejudice? He just isn't that good at acting. Do you have to be the equivalent of Uwe Boll for people to acknowledge that you aren't good at something? It reminds me of those that try and defend the musical talents of Miley Cyrus or Taylor Swift.
No one his judging his performance. We just see the trailer, have watched him in the past and forming an opinion. What is wrong with that? I understand that the results might be different in the final film, but given the track record of actors, why can't people have preconceived notions, an opinion on their skill? You might be wrong, but the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior. It is why fans get excited for Nolan, Edgar Wright or Scorsese films before they ever see a single frame. Because of their past work, they feel like they will be getting something they will enjoy. It is also the same reasoning for why most people don't go to the theater to see Uwe Boll films.In many forums, when some people first heard the news about the casting of Channing Tatum, some people would immediately claimed that he would ruin the movie. This is the prejudice I am talking about. It is only fair to judge anyone's performance in one movie after you actually see the complete movie (not just a teaser trailer).
Also many actors aren't that good when they started their career, such as Brad Pitt and Sandra Bullock. If they stick around for long enough, they will improve. I just don't think Tatum in 2013 is as bad as some people try to make him to be. Maybe give your memory an update? What is the last Tatum movie you actually watch?