TheIncredibleSk
Hard hitting opinions.
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2011
- Messages
- 4,114
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
It doesn't look black at all. It's just a dark blue.
I have a feeling that even when they have a pure, unobstructed high resolution view of no trunks, people will just resort to, "Oh, they're probably adding the trunks in post."It is clear as day he doesnt have trunks, dude.
http://media.**************.com/images/users/uploads/22122/supermanWM1(2).jpg
It is clear as day he doesnt have trunks, dude.
http://media.**************.com/images/users/uploads/22122/supermanWM1%282%29.jpg
It is clear as day he doesnt have trunks, dude.
http://media.**************.com/images/users/uploads/22122/supermanWM1(2).jpg
I have a feeling that even when they have a pure, unobstructed high resolution view of no trunks, people will just resort to, "Oh, they're probably adding the trunks in post."
It's become pathological at this point.
Its 100%.There no sign of red whatsoever. Anyone who thinks there's trunks is completely blind, really.
why go to all the trouble to show a break between top half and bottom half??maybe they made lines where the trunks are. to break up the hip and the legs.
Dude I wanted trunks just like you but give me a break. You can see blue even with that light reflecting. Do you see red at all? Come on, it's not there. Just let it go.
No, it's not that. It's the refusal to admit something that is so clearly true.Why because I don't agree with you?
This proves it.One thing is 100% sure. No Trunks. This picture ends the debate, pure and simple:
http://media.**************.com/images/users/uploads/22122/supermanWM1%282%29.jpg
No, it's not that. It's the refusal to admit something that is so clearly true.