JAK®;25088865 said:When exactly was that page published? This is what I see when I think of Curt Swan's Superman;
![]()
IMAGINING SUPERMAN:
JAK®;25088865 said:When exactly was that page published? This is what I see when I think of Curt Swan's Superman;
![]()
This is pretty much the first time I've ever found her all that attractive.
Later, /ts/ changed into /s/ in many Romance languages and dialects. Spanish has not used this symbol since an orthographic reform in the 18th century (which replaced "ç" with the now-devoiced "z"), but it was adopted for writing other languages.
It's an omega.
Probable based on what?
The Greek alphabet already has a Z. It's called Zeta. Why would they pick omega "O" just because it's last? Why would they even pick Greek out of all the alphabets?
Superman's S is Latin.
All the other Kryptonian design looks Medieval.
Therefore, a truncated Medieval Latin Z is far more probable than an uneven, upside down, tilted omega.
No it isn't. It is naive to reason the creative process backwards, with full nerd application. The designer ended up with a stylised omega, so it is a fair bet that he started with one, and got there by looking at some non-Latin alphabets, probably associating the last letters in each with a Z. The motive would just be to find a symbol that looked nice without resembling a common Latin character.
That's possible, but I think they put a lot of thought into how the movie looks. Making Zod's symbol doesn't seem like something they would do randomly.
We are both reasoning backwards, which is inevitable if you are retracing a creative process. I'm really not sure how you can believe you are 'reasoning forward', when the end point is in front of you and you are trying to deduce its origin. I think my reasoning is more realistic and requires less nerd application, which is the distinction I was making.
Yeah, they put a lot of thought into how they want the film to look, but it feels that some people may be really over analyzing Zod's symbol.