SpideyVille
Walking out the Desert
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2008
- Messages
- 24,524
- Reaction score
- 5
- Points
- 31
I never thought about Gemma before, but I think she fits nicely, especially since she's from England like Lara.
I never thought about Gemma before, but I think she fits nicely, especially since she's from England like Lara.
I just watched the video, and I've gotta say, as much as this makes an already great looking game look even better, it makes me wonder about the whole graphics/gameplay debate. I loved Tomb Raider on my PS3, so much that it would be high up on my GOTY ranking, and I definitely plan on planning through it again now that I finally have my own copy. But at the same time, I don't know if I would buy this again, especially at $60, if I had a next gen system. Sure it looks amazing, but I don't know how much a better face and subtle movements of equipment would make my experience better.http://www.xboxachievements.com/new...ition-Trailer-Shows-Off-Improved-Visuals.html
Video of the improvements
I guess what I'm just asking is, are graphics really that important? I mean, you're basically getting the same exact game, just a prettier version. It's not like an HD remake of an old game, and there's not even any new features or modes. I guess getting the DLC stuff adds to the value in that sense, but their big selling point seems to more about the look of the game, and not the feel of it.I think this new version will appeal most to gamers who either didn't play the original or only played some of it.
if you've already played most or all of the original game, I'm not sure how appealing the new version will be.....especially at $60.
I only played a bit of the original game, before trading it in for a good deal.
I'm definitely picking this up on the PS4 next week!
I think by "original," he was referring to the reboot on the PS3, not the original Playstation One games. As was I, because I really love this rebooted version and cannot wait to see what happens next with this series.I've played the original game, and most of it's sequels. But I still like what I have seen from the reboot.
I guess what I'm just asking is, are graphics really that important? I mean, you're basically getting the same exact game, just a prettier version. It's not like an HD remake of an old game, and there's not even any new features or modes. I guess getting the DLC stuff adds to the value in that sense, but their big selling point seems to more about the look of the game, and not the feel of it.
I think by "original," he was referring to the reboot on the PS3, not the original Playstation One games. As was I, because I really love this rebooted version and cannot wait to see what happens next with this series.
Speaking of which, I really hope that this is a true reboot of the franchise, because I would hate to have this have this Lara evolve into the one from the past games. If they did that, this would be more of a prequel than a reboot.
I think most people will feel funny about paying $60 for a product which is so similar to another product that they've already paid $60 for but I don't think this case says anything about graphics not being important. If the difference had just been some gameplay improvements like fast weapon swaps, extra evasive moves, superior inventory management etc you might feel just as hesitant about paying $60 again for playing what is essentially still the same game. People want new experiences for new sets of $60s!I just watched the video, and I've gotta say, as much as this makes an already great looking game look even better, it makes me wonder about the whole graphics/gameplay debate. I loved Tomb Raider on my PS3, so much that it would be high up on my GOTY ranking, and I definitely plan on planning through it again now that I finally have my own copy. But at the same time, I don't know if I would buy this again, especially at $60, if I had a next gen system. Sure it looks amazing, but I don't know how much a better face and subtle movements of equipment would make my experience better.
Seeing how they improved the graphics for this definitely makes me excited to see how the sequel will look, but I'm a little conflicted about how I feel about this now. It's like it's nice to see, but is it really necessary, and wouldn't their resources be better used if they took that time to work on a sequel and get it out sooner?
Really I think it's less about the graphics and more about the accessibility. Everyone who owns a next-gen console right now is desperately wishing they had more games to play, so a critically praised game that they might have missed the first time around is the perfect thing to fill that void.
Yeah that's already been debunked
They're both inferior to the PC version anyway.
Everyone knows that 30FPS makes games look more cinematic anyway. Combine that with Xbox One's revolutionary Snap feature, so I can catch up on my favorite shows, Skype with my friends, or watch a sporting event while I play Tomb Raider, and the Xbox One version will be the best possible version of the game and a true next generation experience. No doubt about it.
[BLACKOUT]Does Microsoft pay under the table for positive forum posts, or is it just for YouTube videos?[/BLACKOUT]
Lies.
Playing this on the Xbone... It's pretty rad. I'm loving it even though I've played it before (graphics are really something). Motion controls and voice command are fine but unnecessary.
I'd say it definitely stands up as a next gen title, looks great and I'd forgotten what an outstanding game this was.
I'd say for anyone with next-gen who never played it, you'd be insane not to get it.