Iron Man Tons of positive early screening Iron Man reviews

http://www.moviehole.net/news/20080418_clints_review_iron_man.html

Clint's review from Moviehole.


Seems that Downey Jr.'s performance has been getting the most praise from all these early reviews... which is awesome. :yay:

I remember reading the exact same stuff about BB - that the "making the gadgets" stuff was too long, that action took too long to kick in, yadda yadda, and the movie still worked just fine. From what I seen, the "building the suit" scenes may actually be some of the best in the movie.
 
:confused:

Neither of those movies cleaned up. Semi-successes is what they were, especially worldwide.

Yeah i think as awesome as BB is, it didn't actually do that great int he box office that year compared to Harry Potter or even War of the Worlds. But i think people were skeptical of Batman coming back after the Schumacher crap in the 90s. So i think with the TDK they know it is well worth it after they saw how great BB was.
 
Neither of those movies cleaned up. Semi-successes is what they were, especially worldwide.

I didn't say box office smash, but both of them were very successful movies. When did a fairly dark, non child-centric movie making $371 million worldwide become not cleaning up at the box office?
 
I hate how half the damn southern hemisphere has seen the film's release and were here still waitin.
 
None of these early reviews from actual sources seem to be raves.
 
None of these early reviews from actually sources seem to be raves.

People rrr'rave' about Citizen Kane, The English Patient, In America, French Connection. WE rave about dark masks and flying people. Of which of we'll do plenty after May 2nd.
 
People rrr'rave' about Citizen Kane, The English Patient, In America, French Connection. WE rave about dark masks and flying people. Of which of we'll do plenty after May 2nd.
What are you talking about?
 
Here's another positive one and it's fairly spoiler free:

http://disposablemedia.blogspot.com/2008/04/in-review-iron-man-movie.html

Disposable Media proudly presents one of the very first reviews of Marvel's latest comic book adaptations, Iron Man. Released world-wide on May 2nd, DM was lucky enough to attend the first Premiere of the film in Sydney last night, in the presence of Robert Downey Jnr. and director John Favreau, who revealed that the film has only been finalised in the last 2 weeks. Downey meanwhile admitted he hadn't seen the final version of the film until the premiere but was delighted by both the film and the audience's reaction throughout the screening. But is it any good? Read on to find out the first definitive review.

Marvel films carry a lot of expectations and with every new adaptation a new set of problems, worries and concerns arise. Iron Man is no different: Can Jon 'Elf' Favreau really turn one of Hollywood's most infamous wild-children, Robert Downey Jnr., into one of the most beloved Marvel characters?

The answer is a resounding yes, aided in no small part due to Downey being so perfectly cast as Tony Stark that at times the dividing line between character and actor are indistinguishable. There's clearly a lot of Downey himself thrown into the character, but that's not to say that Downey gives an obvious performance, far from it in fact. At face value Downey as Stark is akin to Depp as Captain Jack Sparrow in the Pirates of the Caribbean films - full of flair and quirky personality, arrogance and cock-sure swagger. His attitude, actions and consequences are all exaggerated and highlight both the extremity of the character and the nature of a comic book hero – imaginative fantasies played out through creativity.

Stark is the perfect comic book character - the richest, most famous and talented man in America, complete with a playboy lifestyle and carefree attitude not too dissimilar to Downey's life during his mid-90s excess. But as the film progresses and Stark confronts his demons and chosen isolation, Downey subtly weaves other elements into the character, a regretful man, one of innate anger and child-like insecurity at times. Seeing Stark use these aspects of himself to fuel the personality of Iron Man whilst Downey does the same to create Stark and then keep up the performance for the whole two hour duration is wonderfully hypnotic. The film allows Stark to take a personal journey in a way that many other super-hero films or summer blockbusters would be afraid of, Batman Begins being an obvious exception. As a character Stark is captivating, as a performance, Downey is enthralling. It's not just Downey; all of the performances are well considered. Jeff Bridges and Gwyneth Paltrow in particular both offer similar exaggerations to create a fantasy world that so few comic book adaptations dare to try, never mind achieve. But the film doesn’t stray too far from reality, clearly taking into account modern day America with some carefully worked social commentary to help ground the film. By using such a contemporary setting it allows the super-hero film to flourish. Where Spider-Man and X-Men were intent on producing stories and worlds that could have been real, Favreau and the script writers have achieved a fantastical, pretension-free world that never gets too ridiculous and that good work makes the film all the more fun to watch.

The story is fairly compact, concentrating as much on action as it does exposition, never dwindling into overly-complex character backgrounds or unnecessary side plots. Therein lies one of the films great triumphs: the pace. Marvel are clearly hoping for a franchise with Iron Man with the ending and a scattering of quotes hinting (or even explicitly mentioning) future adventures for Iron Man, but it doesn’t get bogged down in becoming a base for any future sequels. As with any super-hero movie, the first half is largely focused on the creation of Iron Man as a character and Stark’s motivations, but Favreau very carefully ensures that this is never too 'heavy' and that you're never too far from some action or an important revelation. It's a balancing act that few blockbusters get right, but the success here is what makes the film so enjoyable and so much fun.

Because that is what this film is: Fun.

Jokes are frequent but never heavy-handed and the physical acting from Downey learning the suit never becomes slap-stick. There are considered one-liners delivered to perfection from the supremely confident and razor-sharp Stark and it is all held together with clever jump-cuts and quick-edits that makes the film one that you'll smile at almost constantly until the action stops.

If there is a problem it is the action, or lack of it. The relatively tight 2 hour running time means that there isn't that much room for lengthy fight scenes and occasional bursts of frantic action throughout the film take their place. The action scenes are certainly well created and any questions over Favreau's ability to direct an action film are almost instantly dispelled. The effects too are superb, never knowingly flashy or particularly revolutionary, but consistently seamless. The use of camcorders in particular demonstrate how well integrated the effects are into the Mise-en-scène and are at their best when the mechanics of the suit are shown in detail and during the climatic fight.

It's easy enough to try to rank super-hero films, but Iron Man stands separated from previous films. Downey's calculated performance is superb and his development as Stark from carefree-bachelor to world-weary war-monger and back again makes the film. Iron Man follows a similar template to last year's Transformers, but with more of an edge. Favreau's direction and vision for this film will appease fans of the comic and yet not alienate mainstream audiences. It's superb from start to finish with a relentless pace and a wonderful first instalment in what will hopefully become a great franchise and is an example of how to make a blockbuster.
 
Here's another positive one and it's fairly spoiler free:

It's easy enough to try to rank super-hero films, but Iron Man stands separated from previous films. Downey's calculated performance is superb and his development as Stark from carefree-bachelor to world-weary war-monger and back again makes the film. Iron Man follows a similar template to last year's Transformers, but with more of an edge. Favreau's direction and vision for this film will appease fans of the comic and yet not alienate mainstream audiences. It's superb from start to finish with a relentless pace and a wonderful first instalment in what will hopefully become a great franchise and is an example of how to make a blockbuster.

That paragraph is amazing.
 
Transformers was terrible, I certainy hope the movie isn't anything like it.
 
I remember reading the exact same stuff about BB - that the "making the gadgets" stuff was too long, that action took too long to kick in, yadda yadda, and the movie still worked just fine. From what I seen, the "building the suit" scenes may actually be some of the best in the movie.

Yeah, I read this guy's critique at (comics2film) and although he did have a few problems with the film, i.e. long runtime and not enough action for his taste, he gave it an overall positive review. A rating of 4 out of 5 stars. So it would seem, at least by his standards, that it might not be a masterpeice, it is above average and a good solid film, which is what I'd hoped for in the beginning.

I hope this all translates into B.O. success and we get a sequel. It seems the common thread that comes through in all these early reviews is Robert Downey Jr.'s performance as Tony Stark. Brilliant. Can't wait til May 2.
 
Transformers was terrible, I certainy hope the movie isn't anything like it.

say what? It was a hell of lot better than Marvel's movies last year (Spiderman 3, FF2). By the way, I liked those two movies, Im not hating, just trying to make a point.
 
say what? It was a hell of lot better than Marvel's movies last year (Spiderman 3, FF2). By the way, I liked those two movies, Im not hating, just trying to make a point.

And I still don´t see what people saw in that movie, other than cool FX and Megan Fox´s hotness. The script had an IQ of 65 or less.
 
its funny how many reviews say RD jr. is perfectly cast as Tony Stark, even though i bet 99% of the reviewers have no idea what Tony Stark is like in the comics:oldrazz:
 
its funny how many reviews say RD jr. is perfectly cast as Tony Stark, even though i bet 99% of the reviewers have no idea what Tony Stark is like in the comics:oldrazz:
Ha, I know I would be one of those if I were a critic. I'm not a comic book person - the only 2 I've ever read are Buffy Season 8, b/c I loved the show, and Watchmen, b/c my comic-book-loving buddy made me (I'm glad - it was one of the best pieces of fiction I've ever read). I'm a film geek, so my interest in comic book movies only correlates to what filmmakers/actors are involved, so I was mildly interested in this movie b/c of the cast (and I think Favreau's talented, even though he's unproven with this type of movie). But now that I've seen the trailers/tv spots, even though I don't think I've ever even seen an Iron Man comic in real life and therefore have no idea what Stark's supposed to be like, I find myself thinking, "Downey OWNS this role!" Honestly, his performance seems so good here, he makes it seem perfectly clear what Tony Stark is supposed to be - a modern day Howard Hughes (pre-crazy). That's how it comes across to me, anyway, and I'd be shocked if he isn't exactly like that in the comics. These trailers/tv spots took me from "mildy interested" to "I must see this movie NOW." So bravo, Marvel/Paramount marketing dept. And RDJ, of course. Wow, this got wordy fast. Sorry. :yay:
 
im not getting my hopes high on this movie, but i don't expect the movie to be bad either
 
And I still don´t see what people saw in that movie, other than cool FX and Megan Fox´s hotness. The script had an IQ of 65 or less.

It delivered what I was expecting from a live-action adaption of that franchise. And I say that as a long-time TF fan.
 
Transformers was terrible, I certainy hope the movie isn't anything like it.

Well,of course it sucks if you want it to be something it isn't about(being Oscar worthy or being Oscar nominated or being inspiring or being straight up thought provoking).
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"