fifthfiend
M4J3ST1C L3G1SL4C3R4TOR
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2002
- Messages
- 9,013
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
Purportedly, the Trapster.
Also probably Stilt-Man because I mean come on, stilts.
Also probably Stilt-Man because I mean come on, stilts.
Purportedly, the Trapster.
Also probably Stilt-Man because I mean come on, stilts.
See but with trapster you can do what Timm did with clock King, change his gimmick, switch it from glue to death traps. Death traps are big after the Saw movies.
That's a pretty superficial way of improving a character. I mean, change his gimmick, and what really changes besides the gimmick? He's still the same person. Plus, switching to death traps is such a massive change that you might as well use a different character (like Arcade, who's gimmick is already deathtraps). Really, if you want to change The Trapster's gimmick, have it be a logical extension of his current gimmick: Expand the adhesive angle to make him an expert on chemical weapons in general. Have him use a combination of adhesives, acids, and explosives to do whatever he's trying to do. And simultaneously work on his personality. I mean, he's tougher in a fight now. Huzzah. But unless you take at least a little time to explain who he is and how he thinks, nothing's really improved. He's just as bland a character as he was before, except now lacking the novelty value of being kind of pathetic.
Hey you know what would actually be kind of neat? Is sort of a loosely affiliated organization of all these oddly specialized villains as sort of an independent contractor outfit. So you'd have like one guy that say, Norman Oborne calls and Norm's like "well **** nothing for it but I need a dude who's handy with a glue gun" and Trapster Pot Pete shows up and he's like "yeah boss, I'm your guy, just show me what needs gluin'." Or the Kingpin is sitting there being like "Man that **** is just hella high up there, we gonna need us a dude with stilts" and they call up the agency and Stilt-Man is like "**** yeah I got you covered on some stilts!" Fit these guys in somewhere between main-threat villainy and nameless mooks and they might actually be semi-interesting.
I've been thinking for a while that a lot of these villains with lame or limited use gimmicks would work well on a villain team that was modeled after "Ocean's 11." Everyone has specific jobs to do in the overal plan, not simply going in and beating up super heroes.
What does Ultimate Marvel have to do with the fact that yo momma's a ho?
So what, its the Ultimate universe, he wouldn't be the same character in the first place, if want to read about the 616 Trapster, be my guest, but why would Ultimate trapster be the same? Is there any reason why they should be the same?
DCUA Clock King is way different from DCU Clock King, but which one is the better character?
What does any of this have to do with Ultimate marvel?
The adults are talking.
Well, there's no point in calling him The Trapster if you completely change the character. He should bear some resemblence to 616 Pete. The chemical weapons expert angle is an extension of the character as he is now, and would seem like less of a saw rip off/stand in for Arcade.
.
But his gimmick was an extension of the original character: Obsession with time. They just did it better in DCAU. Also, as for who is the better character, that is arguable. The regular Clock King actually has a pretty decent backstory, even though it wasn't used very well..
Nothing, really. I was just responding to fifthfiend's idea.
And since when do little girls with dollies say "your momma's a ho"?
There's adults on the Hype?
Are they not aware that this is the Hype?
And since when do little girls with dollies say "your momma's a ho"?
So acting like a foolish and a belligerent 12 year old is okay here? News to me.
Well then perhaps this should be its own topic then, in instead of derailing this thread.
Dude, kids grow up fast these days.
EDIT:
See? I just aged 6 years!
I again direct your attention to this is The Hype?
One of us is clearly misinformed about how things work around here, and I don't think it's me.
I don't see why, Ultimate Arcade has no association with death traps, so Ultimate trapster wouldn't be a rip off him, heck Ultimate arcade bears little similarity to 616 arcade and Ultimate Sinister is vasty different from his 616 counter part, so there is a prescient for such changes.
The back story for tockman was pretty stupid, hasn't he heard of getting a second opinion?
At least temple seemed insane, suffering from an extreme form of OCD, instead of being an idiot.
Plus which one is more compentent?
here's an idea, get some good manners and stop resorting to such childish insults, because you are just derailing the thread at this point.
I'm quite done talking to you in the mean time and please stop wasting everyone's time.
Yes. But that doesn't necessarily mean it's the best way to do things.
Fugate is more competent, but competence doesn't meant he's a better character. Tockman's story is fairly human. He thought he was going to die, tried to help his sister, got ****ed over, and she ended up dying instead of him. He didn't get a second a opinion. Not everyone does. He doesn't have to be a genius to be a good character or a good villain. In fact, some of the best villains in fiction got to where they were after a series of horrible choices that led them down a self destructive path.
Still personally, i don't like when some does something stupid, that could of being avoided with an ounce of common sense. that's how a lot movies get made, where characters do stupid things, instead of doing the obvious thing that would solve their problems.
If a doctor told most people they were dying, most people would seek a second opinion, only an idiot wouldn't. Tockman is an idiot, which means he is not much of a threat at all. I just don't characters like that.
That's not true at all. He made a few mistakes in one area of his life. That doesn't mean he can't be dangerous.
So wait - what does Clock King have to do with Ultimate Marvel?
Okay naw naw, just funnin' you.
Seriously though who says everybody gets a second opinion? I'm sure a lot of people just say hey as far as I know my doctor knows his ****, he wouldn't tell me I'm gonna die if I'm not gonna die.
Who even says someone has the money to pay for a second opinion? Opinions aren't cheap when they're a doctor's opinion; if you're a person on an already-stretched budget like CK presumably was (what with the sickly-sister situation and whatever related bills) you aren't gonna have the money to go buying redundant medical advice even if you did think it might be a good idea.
Sure, I know a lot of people who might say well the doctors know what they're doing, I guess I'm ****ed. Can't say for sure, not knowing anyone who is going to die in six months. But yeah a lot of people just tend to, you know, trust that their doctor isn't ****ing up.