Ultimate Ronin?!?wtf?

K.B.

Sidekick
Joined
Dec 3, 2004
Messages
4,040
Reaction score
0
Points
31
Anyone who has seen the new solicits has seen the debut of Ultimate Ronin..c'mon you have got to be kidding me. Ulitmaizing a character thats what, a year old? year and a bit? thats riduclous..whats worse is how many fans are looking forward to this...did I wake up in bizzarro world or something?
 
Even worse is that this is now the third time that Bendis is giving us the "Who's Ronin?" mystery in less than 2 years.
 
Actually, Ronin's about eight years old now, as Echo first apeared in 1999.
 
Actually, there is a 9 year waiting to become a ultimate title .>)
 
Actually, Ronin's about eight years old now, as Echo first apeared in 1999.

But someone else is in the Ronin costume and Ronin (either as Echo, Ultimate Ronin, or this new guy) hasn't even been around for 2 years. So it is the third time in 2 years where we've had this "Who's Ronin" bulls**t
 
It's dumb as s--t. I have never liked ultimaye spider-man and always thought it was the book Bendis wrote when he was out of ideas,and after seeing this,I'm pretty sure he's tapped the keg right about now.
 
Most of the time they don't even need to be ultimized..I just hate Ultimate spider-man. Terrible, terrible book.
 
Does anyone have a pic of Ultimate Ronin?

Ultimate Spiderman used to be the best spiderman title on the shelves.

Ultimizing characters holds no restriction on how long their legacy is.

Maybe they'll make Ronin interesting for once.

Great name. Terrible character.


- DOOM
 
here ya go von Doom.

ULTSM108col.jpg
 
does it really matter what order characters show up in the ultimate timeline???

i didn't realise their was a chronological order similar to 616 that they had to follow...

:o
 
Well excuse me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the Ultimate line originally intended to reimagine the current Marvel Universe starting from the beginning? How can you do that by throwing in characters who shouldn't really be around yet, technically?

Why Ronin, damnit!? Why not the Prowler? I want Ultimate Prowler!!
 
I like the way you think King. Ultimate Prowler would be pretty cool to see. Also I just realized that I knew who echo was and started thinking about the whole ronin timeline... NOW MY HEAD HURTS!
 
This is just really really stupid. Just basically Bendis ******* himself off.
 
Well excuse me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the Ultimate line originally intended to reimagine the current Marvel Universe starting from the beginning? How can you do that by throwing in characters who shouldn't really be around yet, technically?

Why Ronin, damnit!? Why not the Prowler? I want Ultimate Prowler!!

I doubt they had the restriction of following the 616 timeline. The starting point was using these characters as if they had begun in current times and then anything goes.

None of the other Ultimate titles has been faithful to the 616 timeline so I don't know if this was a specific expectation you had for Ultimate Spider Man.

Another point I see as incorrect in this thread is saying that the Spidey title is the only one that's revamping characters. All the other titles have done it, too. Ult. FF recently introduced Ultimate versions of Thanos and Ronan just to give an example.

With all that said, I agree with the complaints on how cheap and ridiculous this is. Maybe if Bendis wasn't introducing the character on two different titles at the time people wouldn't be so outraged. And using the same "mysterious character" gimmick doesn't help matters either.
 
Another point I see as incorrect in this thread is saying that the Spidey title is the only one that's revamping characters. All the other titles have done it, too. Ult. FF recently introduced Ultimate versions of Thanos and Ronan just to give an example.

I didn't mean that USM was the only title to introduce Ultimized characters, I should have rephrased. USM gets characters it has no business getting: Omega Red and Deadpool for instance. I would have much prefered to see those 2 show up in UXM. That's al I meant.
 
I didn't mean that USM was the only title to introduce Ultimized characters, I shiuld have rephrased. USM gets characters it has no business getting: Omega Red and Deadpool for instance. I would have much prefered to see those 2 show up in UXM. That's al I meant.

Yeah, thanks for the clarification because what you wrote and what you meant.....um, they're pretty different.:o
 
Well excuse me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the Ultimate line originally intended to reimagine the current Marvel Universe starting from the beginning? How can you do that by throwing in characters who shouldn't really be around yet, technically?

Why Ronin, damnit!? Why not the Prowler? I want Ultimate Prowler!!
well surely a reimagining would also mean that some characters would exist before others...

no one batted an eyelid when ultimate spidey came along before ultimate fantastic four, ultimate x-men and ultimate captain america

why the beef with ultimate ronin, I mean really, who cares?

judge the story by the story, not because it's based on a character that hasn't been around for a while.
 
If you can find it in your heart to forgive me, I shan't do it again sir.

Eh, there's nothing to forgive, really; it's ok. It's not the first time I've run into people writing one thing and meaning another in the Hype.:D It just seemed kind of odd. For all I know you could have only been reading USM and thus your comment, that's why I gave the UFF example.;) It's cool.:up:
 
I'm waiting for them to put out Ultimate Paste-Pot-Pete.... :D
They've done everyone else
 
Ultimate Ronin will be just as good as 616 Ronin....
 
Can anyone else picture Bendis sitting at home playing Marvel Ultimate Alliance on the PSP for countless hours? What's his fixation with Ronin?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,164
Messages
21,908,475
Members
45,703
Latest member
BMD
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"