HighFivingMF
Welp.
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2009
- Messages
- 15,351
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
ЯɘvlveR;24197731 said:cool. thanks for stopping by.
Heh.
ЯɘvlveR;24197731 said:cool. thanks for stopping by.
That's pretty much exactly what I would want. I'd also want it to initially take place 10 years or so into the future, where Blake actually took time off to train. That way, Batman's return could ignite the flame within a whole new generation of Gothamites. If he fought crime right away, the sacrifice Batman made would have lost it's impact. So he should leave for 10 years, and during that time, a new advanced version of the mob is rising up (led by Black Mask). This could also explain Freeze's tech.Hopefully we'll get Freeze in the reboot, but even a Nolanized Freeze would have been insane.
Asteroid-Man, pretty good combo! They could have pulled off an entire trilogy with Black Mask/Penguin as the freak mobsters, Riddler as a supporting villain in one and Joker pulling the strings throughout the trilogy. And Freeze as the primary villain for 1 of the films.
Both are too old, Freeze shouldn't be in his 70's lol. Keep Kingsley for Mandarin and Stewart as Professor X.I want Mr. Freeze done RIGHT. Maybe have Patrick Stewart or Sir Ben Kingsley play the villain.
Read the last few pages or so of the JGL thread (in the TDKR forum) I completely disagree with you...there's a long argument about that lol. It's more open to just "he's Batman". He can be whatever he chooses to be.
I won't continue the argument here, but for the sake of this thread..whether it's Batman Beyond or whatever...Freeze can be done Nolan style but stretched a little bit. It shouldn't be about what the fans want. It was never that way with Nolans universe anyway. Heath's Joker and Hathaway's Catwoman was never what we wanted going into it. A lot of people loved it, some not so much. You can't please everybody, you just have to do your own interpretation sometimes.
But ya, Bane is definately dead.
I was thinking something along those lines, Penguin in a political position for a sequel. But not right away because i think Riddler would be a logical choice coming after Bane. Scaling it down to a detective story. This will probably happen first in the reboot but it works great with Blake too.I agree with you that the identity of the villain has more to do with serving the theme and metaphor of the story. I think after the terrorist act of Bane; a likely theme to rise is that of the (political) reaction, which is why I suggest Penguin as the background villain (to carry over into future sequels).
...
I believe the ending was very explicit. Gordon finds a new Bat signal, and the final image of the movie is the "Dark Knight" rising.
Bruce Wayne says to Robin that he created Batman so that anyone could be Batman. There is no question to me that Robin will now take over as the Batman.Al GhulBatman is immortal.
...
About the bat-signal - unlike past interpretations, Nolan used the bat-signal as a way to scare off criminals, not so much to call on Batman. I remember there being a line in the beginning of TDK where Gordon says something about Batman not really responding to the signal, but putting it up to let criminals know he's out there. I could totally see them still using the signal even after his "death" for the superstitious, cowardly lot.
Also, when Bruce said anyone could be Batman, I'm sure he meant that anyone could stand up to injustice in their own way just as he did. It's in the same vein as when he told Gordon that anyone could be hero, even something as little as putting a coat over a child to let him know the world hadn't ended.
"Batman" is Bruce Wayne's creation, derived from his own fear of bats. I thought it was clear that Bruce intended for Batman to be everlasting as a symbol, and not as a legacy. He ultimately wanted to inspire people to act, to shake them out of apathy, so he wouldn't have to be Batman anymore (not so much that someone else would be Batman in place of him). Why else would he put his trust in Harvey Dent, and not the copycats dressed as Batman?
I personally don't know what John Blake would become, but I really don't think it's Batman - it's certainly not what Bruce would have wanted. It would undermine his sacrifice that let him "die a hero," and besides...I have a feeling Blake would find an identity that links to his past, just as Bruce did with his fear of bats. I can totally see Blake finding inspiration from his real name "Robin" from the bird and Robin Hood. I know many people say that's stupid because that's his real name...but everyone knows him as John Blake, and he told Batman he wasn't afraid to show himself upon hearing the suggestion to wear a mask. Using his original name while wearing a mask would reconcile both notions. I personally thought it was genius, but I can see where that's completely ******ed too. Another thing is though, John Blake is sort of a nobody, whereas everyone knows who Bruce Wayne is.
In the end, TDKR's ending was a very good end to the series. To me, he will always be Robin, and for others he will be the next Batman or Nightwing. He's whatever SHH needs him to be. Call it in.
BUT if he's to be The Dark Knight Beyond, I'd say Black Mask and Mr. Freeze.