Visual Concepts: The PS3 is better at pixel rendering, physics, and PS3 2K7 > 360 2K7

Take a boooow!

goldmember03.jpg
 
Fenrir said:
THANKS. I'LL MAKE IT A POINT NOT TO ENGAGE IN ANY CIVIL DISCOURSE WITH YOU HENCEFORTH. THWIP AND WHF ARE RIGHT. YOU'RE NOT WORTHY OF THE LUXURY OF AN INTELLIGENT, HONEST DEBATE AND HENCE, DESERVE EVERY BIT OF THE CONFRONTATIONAL RESPONSES YOU GET. :down:

If it makes you feel any better I wasn't actually including you in that. Way to be really hypersensitive. So the hypocrites are right then?

Seriously, didn't mean to offend you or anything, it's the internet, and I replied to your points without any insults.

Jeez man.
 
Zenien said:
Really? Are you sure you aren't thinking about Virtua Tennis? It doesn't obliterate anything, troll boy.
Oh, that's right. This is NBA 2k7, which is ALREADY OUT on the Xbox360. Huh. Big surprise that the version coming out at least a month later would have something tweaked.

Oh wait, no it isn't. This is done all the time, and you can expect plenty of PS3 games to look better on the Xbox360, The Darkness (a game people actually care about, unlike Generic Basketball 80000) being an immediate example, despite launching at the SAME time.
 
That totally didn't answer anything WHF. The same team responsible for Fight Night on the 360 are the ones who have made the PS3 release.

And the Darkness 360 will have slightly sharper textures (according to the devs) because of the Ram situation between the two consoles, that's no suprise. :confused:

PS3 uses 256 megs for GPU 256 megs for CPU, Xbox 360 has 512 megs of unified Ram meaning the developers can go over using 256 megs for their GPU.
 
Zenien said:
That totally didn't answer anything WHF. The same team responsible for Fight Night on the 360 are the ones who have made the PS3 release, so it doesn't really matter one way or the other.
Oh wow! That's coming out what, an ENTIRE YEAR LATER? Wow Zenien, I would have thought otherwise, but now that you mention it, I guess that A YEAR ISN'T A DIFFERENCE IN TIME. I'm so shocked that the game saw IMPROVEMENT OVER A YEAR LATER!
 
What the heck is wrong with you. :eek:

Um yeah I sort of already talked about the more dev time = better, but you're dodging the fact that you ****ed up on the "This game has two seperate teams!" thing, troll boy, which is what I was talking about there. Jebus WHF, learn to read. :csad:
 
I swear, the people on this forum are all under 10. At least I hope so, because that's how they all act.
 
Zenien said:
Um yeah, but you're dodging the fact that you ****ed up on the "This game has two seperate teams!" thing, troll boy. Jebus WHF, learn to read. :csad:
Yeah, I made a mistake, only to see there was another GLARING REASON for this to happen. Your thread is still pointless, not "proving" a damn thing to anyone here and to top it off, it's all based on one little game that maybe ONE person on this board will actually care about.
 
When the developers themselves say that the PS3 is better at rendering pixels, or that it's great for physics, THAT is seperate from the benifits of having more dev time. :o
 
^I miss THWIP :(

Why did that crazy ass hole have to get banned and not follow the rules :(
 
He would have been back by now had he not create 4 to 5 other names
 
And openly argued with the mods about it with each and every account knowing full well what the rules are. :o
 
Even so, rules shouldn't apply to forum vets like THWIP*.


...and... myself...
 
Even so, rules shouldn't apply to forum vets like THWIP*.


...and... myself...
 
Zenien said:
The tool situation will improve, that's all I just said. Though I am going to comment here that it's funny that some people believe that there is this pro Sony media as it were when vast majority of Sony news and opinions int he gaming media have beem negative as of late, and I guess any single positive impression could ten fold more then the 10 negative opinions?
We aren't allowed to post positive Sony news! :p Or if we do, we have to expect it to be bashed. Even the Japanese price cut was bashed, when it's blatently a good thing.
 
Says the raving fanboy.

Anyway:

http://media.ps3.ign.com/media/815/815873/vids_1.html

PS3 version =

Better Graphics

Visually, the game has been taken up to a new level, particularly in how the game action is rendered. Not only have the in-game visuals been beefed up thanks to the power of the system, but according to Thomas, the way the PS3 renders pixels gives the game a richer appearance than the 360 version. It looks much more organic and lifelike, and if you thought you were watching a real game on the 360, just wait till you see it on the PS3.

Better Physics

Speaking of taking advantage of the PS3's power, the team has been using the computational power of the system to enhance a large number of the standard features that the game is known for. For instance, the cloth physics of jerseys and shorts has been assigned to one SPU on the PS3 instead of multiple cores on the 360 so that it can move more realistically than ever without taking away processing power for the rest of the game.

Better AI

The reality of NBA 2K7 for the PS3, a game that is already playing as smooth as the 360 version with enhanced AI (better clock management, more post moves) and a show stopping new wrinkle to shooting free throws.

http://sports.ign.com/articles/737/737051p1.html

And before anyone plays the "Omg more devtime" card, it's not like, given the dev situation between the PS3 and 360, that 1 year working on the 360 = 1 Year working on the PS3. Clearly that's not the case.

But here's somethign for all you CoD3 hopefulls posting in the 360 section or seeing that the Rainbow 6 devs are saying the PS3 version of their game will be a port of lesser quality (Big suprise as Ubisoft bases their engines on Direct X and deved these games using the 360 as the core console) Both consoles are very close in power, but a game designed on system A and ported to system B will run better on system A. Not because of power but because each consoled emands a very specialized approach.
 
people so need to try and prove that PS3 is graphically better than 360 and vice versa. That may be the case here that PS3's graphics are better but in other games, 360 has been said to be better. Rememebr that these are only opinions of a select few and Im sure the differences are miinimal and vary from person to person. Same thing happened with current gen as there were some games that did look better on different systems despite Xbox being techincally superior to the PS2 and GC. Unless you own or play both copies, the graphical difference wont be a factor.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"