Picard Sisko
Prepare to be Assimilated
- Joined
- May 28, 2012
- Messages
- 17,944
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
He moves too fast for it to be practical.True, but there were times when Spidey was on the floor shooting webs, why did that need to be CG?
He moves too fast for it to be practical.True, but there were times when Spidey was on the floor shooting webs, why did that need to be CG?
when? i thought lizard looked good, the only time that looked kind of fake was in the bridge when spider-man sees him
honestly, you don't want things to look 'real' most of the time in movies though..
I thought The Amazing Spider-Man had the best effects in a Spider-Man film.
He moves too fast for it to be practical.
It's a crutch for a lot of films unfortunately. Look at the Hobbit.
True, but there were times when Spidey was on the floor shooting webs, why did that need to be CG?
I think TASM has much better CGI than Spider-Man 2.
Spider-Man 2 has some of the truly best CGI in any Spidey film and the best CGI in any film whatsoever. I feel the same with TDK and TDKR as well. BB rarely had some so it's hard to count that much.
Because they were part of a single shot
Disagree here,it looked very video gamish,even the practical shots
Not the best colour combination imo
Yes, but that's the director's choice. It didn't have to be shot like that.
I think on the whole the CG in ASM was quite good but I think better CG and more practicle effects will help the viewer become more engaged with what they are watching.
CGI is unavoidable in a Spider man movieThe film makers need to realise when you have unconvining CG you get taken out of the movie. If I were a director, CG would be an absolute last resort. I would shot all I could IN CAMERA and get the CG artist to add CG elements to to real background plates.
And the budget would go upto 300M,practical stunts arent cheap,CGI isnt either and that is why you need a perfect combination of the two to be financially and visually effectiveLizard has to be CG, there is no getting around that but Spidey didn't have to be when fighting him. Tilted stages, revolving rooms, wire work, anything that makes the scene 'real'.
Even the Times Square fight had no CGILook at Spider-Man 1 you had a lot of CG set pieces but what was the best sequence in the movie by and absolutely country mile? The graveyard fight and there was next to no CG used.
Yes, but that's the director's choice. It didn't have to be shot like that.
I think on the whole the CG in ASM was quite good but I think better CG and more practicle effects will help the viewer become more engaged with what they are watching.
NoSpider-Man 2's effects didn't look video gamish?
The part where he is swinging in and the police tracer hits him,it looked CGI and I though it was CGI,but on watching the behind the scenes reel,I saw that it was actually practically doneWhat practical effects looked like a video game to you?
I'm glad they are starting to do more practical web slinging, so hopefully Webb continues this.
Too many cuts within a fight makes it terrible even if it is well set up
The OSCORP tower fight is a perfect example of this,the fight was an excellent one but too many cuts and poor editing made it look disoriented and not so great