No, it made as much as it did because it is related to Harry Potter.And I am pretty sure this first one had a low turnout because I think not a lot of people are aware this is related to Harry Potter.
No, it made as much as it did because it is related to Harry Potter.
When did I say that? Where did you even get that idea? I think Octoberist nailed it really. Do you think people who hadn't seen a Harry Potter flick made up even a quarter of the audience? Heck 15%?Oh cmon, how can you possibly be certain that everyone who went to see the Harry Potter movies went to see this one. Maybe some of them snubbed this one as a pointless spinoff made solely to earn money.
I would agree in saying a lot of Potter fans didn't go and see the new movie. My question is why would that change going down the road?Nope. I am under the impression 99% of the audience saw the last few Harry Potter films. But I also think 99% of the Potterheads or fans who liked the HP franchise didn't go see this one.
I would agree in saying a lot of Potter fans didn't go and see the new movie. My question is why would that change going down the road?
True. But then there are those that didn't enjoy FB enough to see a sequel in theaters. So unless we are going to see a TDK level surge, why would the box office really change?People end up watching it one day or another and in doing so gives them a reason to check the sequel in the theater.
That's fair.I am assuming most people felt the way I felt when I watched the film. That is it exceeded my expectations. I am obviously not certain the sequel the will do better at the BO. I just hope it follows the Transformers BO performance rather than TMNT.
BoxOffice
@BoxOffice
FANTASTIC BEASTS AND WHERE TO FIND THEM makes an est. $5.6M overseas weekend, don 36.4%, for a $565.7M overseas
Warner Bros.’ Harry Potter spinoff Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them has crossed the $800M mark at the global B.O. Broken out that’s $229.9M stateside and $570.1M overseas.
In addition, Fantastic Beasts just earned five BAFTA Award nominations: for Outstanding British Film, Best Production Design, Best Costume Design, Best Sound, and Best Special Visual Effects.
One very promising note is that while the domestic total was lower than standard, that $229 million cume from a $74.4m debut makes Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them the second-leggiest J.K. Rowling offering aside from Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone back in 2001.
Yes, this is a new franchise, but the post-debut legs, even in the face of Moana and Rogue One (and coming right after Doctor Strange), should not be ignored. The theatrical moviegoing business is much more frontloaded than it was fifteen years ago, and the likes of Fantastic Beasts have gone from event offerings to basically par for the course. I was concerned that the new offering would play more like a "fans only" affair and flame out pretty quickly. So either the fans took their bloody time showing up or there was an audience among the casually curious and those just wanting another big-scale fantasy adventure. Again, the numbers are still lower than the Harry Potter norm, but that it didn't die after Thanksgiving is promising.
POA is the best film in the series. Cuaron knew that a good film takes precedent over a slavish adaptation. It's the most cinematic of them all and the most well made of the franchise. Cuaron also captured the magic, whimsy, and strangeness of the world better than any of the other directors have.
This series would be lucky to have him back.
When I originally saw POA, I didn't know how to feel about it. But as time went on, it became my favorite in the series and overall one of my favorite films period. The last act is a feat unto itself.