KRYPTON INC.
Incorporated Kryptonian
- Joined
- May 23, 2013
- Messages
- 85,991
- Reaction score
- 41,564
- Points
- 103
Probably because she became immortal at that age? And half these actresses do not even look 40.
Go back to the first page, post #7 and see the ages listed and look at current pictures of some of those actresses faces. They do look their age. Not that that is a bad thing, but for this role I am of the opinion that an actress that is at best ten years older than Gal would fit the bill nicely.
I am sorry, but I think the fan casting here is really just an exercise in rose colored nostalgia for some. Carter? Zeta-Jones? BULLOCK? Fine actresses, in good shape for women of their age but none of them scream immortal Amazon Queen to me. Try to remember that time catches most of our fave celebs. Many seem to just be recycling their WW picks from 10 to 15 years ago. Many even then were not a good fit.
As for changing the nature of Hippolyta's agelessness or the like? If it could be done well, or even made a plot point, maybe. But why go through the convolutions and just cast someone in their mid to late 30's that has a more mature but not excessively older look as compared to Gal? Also remember, this is the "Odin" role in the WW films. I think Diana's mother, as she has been throughout her pop culture existence, is a key part of WW's supporting cast. I say cast the part with an eye toward the future. You would want this actress to look reasonable in the role for a considerable period of time, were talking 7-10 years if Hippolyta is in 3 WW films. This is just my opinion. Maybe a Kim Basinger or a Bullock could knock it out of the park. My gut tells me different though.