White_widow
technology theorist
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2010
- Messages
- 1,198
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 31
That's called a turbine. Like those pinwheels.
also gotta think about the when it dry's and gets stuck to the end of the nozzel ... just saying . silly string does that crap all the time !!!!!!! dont think it be much of a problem. but it might not let the web go out correctly. IVE ALSO BEEN THINKING OF THE 3 NOZZEL DESIGN MAYBE WHEN IT GOES THROUGH IT CAN SPIN ITSELF LIKE HOW U PASS THROUGH ONE OFF THE MACHINES AT LIKE DISNEYLAND OR SOMETHING AND U TURN IT , AND IT CRANKS ENERGY WHILE U PASS THREW. so u can like have it in a weird shape, so that when liquid passes threw it turns itself

also gotta think about the when it dry's and gets stuck to the end of the nozzel ... just saying . silly string does that crap all the time !!!!!!! dont think it be much of a problem. but it might not let the web go out correctly. IVE ALSO BEEN THINKING OF THE 3 NOZZEL DESIGN MAYBE WHEN IT GOES THROUGH IT CAN SPIN ITSELF LIKE HOW U PASS THROUGH ONE OFF THE MACHINES AT LIKE DISNEYLAND OR SOMETHING AND U TURN IT , AND IT CRANKS ENERGY WHILE U PASS THREW. so u can like have it in a weird shape, so that when liquid passes threw it turns itself
Ahhhhhh!!! No offense, but I can't understand a word you're saying. Grammar! Spelling! Periods! Capitalization!
Argh. Call me a grammar natzi, but that stuff just bugs me.
I'd suggest that you get on a real computer, because it's kinda hard to understand.sorry i was on my ipad .. hahaha anyways yeah thats what i ment ... period !
Tyseg1cia: Translation said:I'm sorry, I was on my iPad. Yes, White Widow, that is what I meant.
Hey specs, why use the pneumatic pump? I mean, if you can pressurize a cartridge of fluid then why use an electric device? Just curious.
t:guys, guys. Let's not fight. No one's grammar here is perfect. Mine suffers even when I re-read my posts thrice. Anywho, let's get back to the topic at hand. It seems, at least to me, that we each have our own unique view of this project. I have my pvc cartridges, specs has his pump, and wadaltmon, well, he's got his own number of ideas. So i guess the point now is to:
a.) Have each prototype successfully created.
b.)trouble shoot each issue.
I'm guessing that the main issue is in the forming of individual threads. As a sort of catch 22, we can't make a formula until we complete our shooters, but we can't fine tune our shooters without the formulas. Here's what I suggest.
We each create the prototypes. The only requirements are that they can propel a liquid, and that the pressure must be adjustable to compensate for viscosity rates.
Only then can we put stipulations on size of shooter, modifications, and heck, even nozzles can't be created without the fluid.
Why don't we come up with three shooter prototypes. We have the weed eater tank (which I think is brilliant by the way), and the symbiote's host prototype. (when I update my media player's drivers, I'll check that out mate.) Once I finish my retractable hidden blade prototype, I'll use my new found dremeling skills to make the shooter prototype. Once we have three WORKING (with video) prototypes, we can focus on webbing formulas and variations.
I agree. Let's have it by the end of March, beginning April.Sounds good to me.. But I can't make any promises to have it done by March 15.. How about the end of March?