protoctista
Civilian
- Joined
- May 15, 2008
- Messages
- 641
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 11
No, I've been on that for years. I suggested it earlier in this thread and only one person responded, who basically questioned my intelligence for suggesting such a thing. I was told Neeson was the one and only Ra's, end of story, so I moved on.I find it both amusing and ironic that no-one has cottoned onto the point that Ra's al Ghul is a symbol, just as Batman is. They're effectively masks and anyone can wear those masks. Henri Ducard most certainly died in that train crash. He would've been incinerated, crushed and intombed. Now, even though Ducard was the 'real' Ra's al Ghul, it doesn't mean that no-one else has stepped up to the mantle of Ra's al Ghul and taken his place. For instance, the League of Shadows quite cleverly used deception and 'theatricality' to disguise who the real Ra's al Ghul was. The decoy for all intents and purposes left the party along with the other members of the League of Shadows. It would stand to reason that they've re-grouped, recruited and convalesced in order to strike at Gotham once more. Ra's al Ghul can come back but if so, it won't be Henri Ducard.![]()
I don't want to beat a dead horse or stay on this topic much longer but I will respond to this one last time, and then discuss characters that have a good chance of returning.
I guess me and you, and the others here who share your viewpoint, can just agree to disagree. I think I get your point rather easily, I just think you fail to get mine. Bringing back either Ras or Two-Face does bend the believablity scale very far, and this is true, whether you or I like it or not.
See, like I said earlier, we can go comb through and nitpick every instance of something fake happening in these movies, and it really doesn't get to the crux of the argument. Almost every action movie in film history has at least some level of fantasy element to it, and this is even moreso for a comic book film. But it's not the actions, it's the consequences of those actions that have a weight to them in Nolan's vision.
Were the Joker's actions completely far-fetched? Absolutely, you, me, or anyone else on here isn't confused by that. It's illogical to try and explain how he managed to plant bombs and other devices with an almost ghost-like quality, but that isn't my point. The point is, when said bombs actually explode, there's real repurcussions. Speaking of which...
Using your logic, Rachel Dawes should be able to come back as well, her death was no less horrific than Ras Al Ghul's, but I haven't seen anyone clamoring for that, I wonder why? We can't handpick which character we think is cool enough to come back or which villain we think wasn't utilized properly, because once you do that, you open the door for anybody to return, at which point the whole premise that these movies were based on, the idea that on a somewhat realistic level you could acquire these items and dress like a bat or paint your face and become a terrorist, falls flat on it's face. And since there were no Lazarus Pits, and no Permawhite Joker, and no Two-Face robbing the 2nd National Bank of Gotham on Februrary 2nd, it's safe to say there are certain rules that have been established, that need to be adherred to, chief amongst them, when people die, they really die...
Yeah, I think there's room for only one femme fatale in a movie like this, so we could get either Talia or Selina but probably not both.

Although, the potential Talia AND Selina in one film would have? Now that would be fantastic.
Or the potential to combine Talia and Selina into ONE CHARACTER.
Selina Kyle being Bruce's new love interest but under it all Bruce discovers that Selina Kyle is really just an alias for Talia Al Ghul.
She would have the skills of a Ninja (hense why she could kick ass as Catwoman) who dons the outfit to beat him at his own game.
And she could still be a cat burglar, but just steal something far more important and grand than simply jewels. Something more along the lines of the microwave emmiter that her father stole from Wayne in Begins.
What fake Two-Face thing?
Mayor Garcia must return.![]()
t:MAyor Garcia and the Chechen were the best secondary characters of TDK. The Chechen seriously needs to be part of canon. I don't care how they'll reproduce the accent from the film, but they better do it.
Dia is muire dhuit.Paddy! Dia Dhuit!t:
t:Dia is muire dhuit.t:
Good to see ya, welcome back to the boards!

t:
Thankee, my friend. I trust the status remains quo here at the Hype? Half of us are laid-back slackers and the other half are batpoop insane?t:
The Chechen should return as the main villain for the next film - Angry Guy Who Almost Got Eaten By Dogs and Exaggerates Certain Words. It'd be epic.Yeha, The Chechen is the best "Nolan Created" character.
He was so awesome and unique...
It happens to everyone. No problemot: Also, you're working on a movie? That's cool. Just an indie flick for fun?
t:And I actually wouldn't mind seeing a few of the smaller cast return as well. I actually did enjoy the mayor too. He was a nice character, despite his little screen time, he gave you a good sense of where he came from. Someone who obviously didn't seem all corrupt, but who had been disillusioned and now seemed to just be "stuck" in the Gotham mire so to speak.
No, I've been on that for years. I suggested it earlier in this thread and only one person responded, who basically questioned my intelligence for suggesting such a thing. I was told Neeson was the one and only Ra's, end of story, so I moved on.
Uhh...not sure where you are coming from or why you are insulting my intelligence. I'm well aware that Neeson was Ra's and Watanabe was an imposter and that there was no real supernatural element. I've been aware of that since the first time I watched Batman Begins. That was the point of my post. If Ra's truly died, maybe he can still be immortal because Ra's is a title that has been passed down to those deemed worthy of it through the centuries. Just because a Lazarus Pit wouldn't fit in Nolan's films doesn't mean Ra's can't be "immortal". A new Ra's could enter Gotham. Or Neeson's Ra's could have simply survived.
Well, this thread turned out well.

If you just ignore people who're talkin' smack about you, they usually get bored and eventually drop it. Or get their asses kicked by a mod. Just stop replyin' to them if they won't let it go.
But they also both know the truth about what she did. I wonder how that affects her, career-wise? Not well, I would imagine.
Again, can we please keep to discussing the possibilities for the future Batman and not Keyser? I don't want this to turn into a flame fest.
I'd add something on to the above statement but I find myself perfectly satisfied with it.
itsthebatman said:Does Gordon know about her involvement with Maroni? If so, I'd love to see that subplot explored.
Does Gordon know about her involvement with Maroni? If so, I'd love to see that subplot explored.
Run away kids!
t: