- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 64,149
- Reaction score
- 35,571
- Points
- 118
All I've been hearing is complaints and criticisms. I just want to hear what the film got right.
What did Superman Returns get right?
I thought it was an interesting exploration of the super hero paradigm. Essentially, these figures can only exist in extreme or extraordinary contexts. Absent those contexts, theres no role for them to play. So, by definition, the hero cant have the normalcy that s/he fights to preserve for everyone else.
The first half of SR is about Supermans desire for this normalcy. The second half is about accepting that he cant have it. He embraces his place as the perpetual outsider. As the Hero, he must be the guardian of the thing that he can never have.
I wrote an essay about this theme.
http://www.eyesskyward.com/forum/showthread.php?1142-SR-A-Thematic-Analysis
Richard not being the stereotypical jerk to justify Lois leaving him for Superman
The scene towards the end, where Sups talks to Jason in his room while Jason is sleeping was done very well, Brandon made it look good (IMO.), now Christopher Reeve was a good actor but I just cannot imagine him doing that scene that well.
In all honesty there was a lot that Superman Returns got right, its a good movie that is flawed and so people focus on the flaws.
All the Superman save scene's were superb, but there was some great acting there as well, Brandon was awesome as Superman/Clark, and was pitch perfect in most scene's.
The line "You wrote that the world doesnt need a saviour, but everyday I hear people crying for one." was delivered perfectly, as was his speech to Jason at the end.
There were some great emotional moments in the movie as well, I still love it and still wish we would have gotten a sequel.