what would you like to see in season 2 of Wolverine and the X-Men

This series already has humour ,characters like iceman,toad, and forge offer comic relief,also Rover in ep 21 was funny 'DESTROY'
I just saw the series again and there is humour in the at just the right amount Oh and the moment between wolverine and kitty in the danger room ep 6 was funny.

Anyway I wonder if this series will have a chrismas episode, I doubt it as the series feels to busy for that
 
It isn't enough for me. Or maybe I just wish it wouldn't take itself so seriously. Too... dark.
 
Deadpool and Colossus are both confirmed for season 2.

What I was most surprised was that they appear to be keeping the name Deadpool since I thought it would be Wade Wilson.

It basically looks like Deadpool from Hulk VS. which is OUR Deadpool. Get Nolan North back in there and we are set.

The only problem is that Deadpool won't be able to go quite as far and sadistic as he was in Hulk VS., like referencing shooting babies (still can't believe they even threw that in there for a PG-13 animation). But it will still be Deadpool at least.

Man, that was one of my favorite bits in "Hulk Vs" because it was so in character-and I was equally shocked as you that they included that! I am very curious to see how Deadpool will be portrayed in WTXM and how he will make his grand entrance! I bet there will be no chasing after severed limbs while making hand jokes...more's the pity...at least my 7 year old will finally be able to see Deadpool! She's been banned from reading/watching any Deadpool stuff (for obvious reasons:cwink:) but finally she will see one of mommy's favorite Marvel characters!
 
Deadpool and Colossus are both confirmed for season 2.

What I was most surprised was that they appear to be keeping the name Deadpool since I thought it would be Wade Wilson.

It basically looks like Deadpool from Hulk VS. which is OUR Deadpool. Get Nolan North back in there and we are set.

The only problem is that Deadpool won't be able to go quite as far and sadistic as he was in Hulk VS., like referencing shooting babies (still can't believe they even threw that in there for a PG-13 animation). But it will still be Deadpool at least.

Deadpool was great in Wolverine vs Hulk. Although i would have liked to see him kick some serious ass. I hope WATX gets it right though. Besides being crazy and funny, the guy knows how to fight and has a reputation for being very very dangerous.
 
Last edited:
Hey guys. I just got back from the Planet Hulk premiere in LA. Marvel Animation's Josh Fine and WatXM writer, Greg Johnson, were in attendance and talked briefly on season 2. Since this info was revealed in a public forum, I'm assuming it's OK to let out:

-Scripts for season 2 have been written and it is currently in production.

-It sounded like there were some delays in the production that they are in the process of working out. No elaboration on what those issues are/were.

-It's going to happen and they all sounded pretty excited about it. They couldn't give an approximation of when we might see season 2.

So the bad news is we might be waiting a little while for season 2. The good news is that season 2 is still in the works. I don't mind waiting if we get another lengthy 26 episodes season again since that's twice the length we normally get for a season of a show like this. Plus, let's not forget we would have to wait like two years between seasons 1 and 2 and 2 and 3 of Venture Bros. one of the best animated shows on TV.

Josh also told me that the shows on Nicktoons will most likely still be on Nicktoons.
 
Thanks for the info, a delay, so much for a 2010 premiere. Early 2011 seems more likely. Nicktoons will have to hype up season 2 to ensure the US audience are still interested considering the long wait for season 2,but then I trust nicktoons when it comes to promoting the show
 
Thanks for the scoop, Vile! I envy your job!

Oh, well, as they say, good things come to those who wait. Lets hope things will flow more smoothly for future seasons:)
 
Hey guys. I just got back from the Planet Hulk premiere in LA. Marvel Animation's Josh Fine and WatXM writer, Greg Johnson, were in attendance and talked briefly on season 2. Since this info was revealed in a public forum, I'm assuming it's OK to let out:

-Scripts for season 2 have been written and it is currently in production.

-It sounded like there were some delays in the production that they are in the process of working out. No elaboration on what those issues are/were.

-It's going to happen and they all sounded pretty excited about it. They couldn't give an approximation of when we might see season 2.

So the bad news is we might be waiting a little while for season 2. The good news is that season 2 is still in the works. I don't mind waiting if we get another lengthy 26 episodes season again since that's twice the length we normally get for a season of a show like this. Plus, let's not forget we would have to wait like two years between seasons 1 and 2 and 2 and 3 of Venture Bros. one of the best animated shows on TV.

Josh also told me that the shows on Nicktoons will most likely still be on Nicktoons.

I actually went to the NYC version of the PLANET HULK advance screening (I scored tickets at Jim Hanley's Universe in Staten Island), although WOLVERINE AND THE X-MEN weren't discussed. Our panelists were Joe Quesada, Eric Rollman, and Greg Pak, along with moderator Matt Stryker (from WWE). It was a blast. If anyone wants to read an article about it (with, warning, major PLANET HULK spoilers), it's in my signature link.

Anyway, we have been hearing that Season 2 wouldn't be around until "late 2010" anyway so some word of production delay now doesn't surprise me.

Thanks for the word. The only downer is the longer we have to wait, the more time everyone has to complain about Cyclops or Gambit or whatever. ;)
 
Last edited:
LOL, how do you like that, small world the Dread?

What's funny is it was the same venue on both sides of the coast :D .
 
Makes sense. If the plan is still for 26 episodes, 2011 seems more likely.
 
LOL, how do you like that, small world the Dread?

What's funny is it was the same venue on both sides of the coast :D .

I know.

http://www.comicscontinuum.com/stories/1001/25/wolverinexmen.htm

Two minute Video interview with Josh Fine about Season 2. Highlights:

- The show's second season is still in production. 8 episodes have been written but there seems to have been no voice recording and no animation done. Josh Fine doesn't have an exact air date for Season 2 but expects to have it in "the near future". Odds of seeing a whole episode before 2011 seem slim. Hopefully, though, we should start seeing promotional images and maybe a teaser by the end of the fall or winter 2010. Personally I wouldn't be surprised if part of the reason for production delay is the ambition to move Craig Kyle out of the animation department and into the live action film department. With Chris Yost probably busy on AVENGERS: EMH's stuff in between writing stuff, Season 2 could be more Greg Johnson's show than Season 1, but that's all IMHO.

- Mr. Fine stressed that the Age of Apocalypse would be a central theme in Season 2 and that much effort would be made "to present that world" to the viewers, while also promising surprises. I would expect it to get as much air time as the "Future X" episodes did in Season 1, which was some 2-4 episodes of material.

- He confirmed that there would be "many new characters" as well as re-confirmed the designs shown at the SDCC last year, of Colossus, Magik, Havok, and Deadpool showing up in Season 2. He stated that Colossus "returns in a big way" and that Havok shows up for a "few" episodes. He also stated there would be other new characters besides these.
 
This is PURELY speculation on my part, but my suspicion is that the delays could be caused by maybe with the animation studio that did the first season. Or maybe they are trying to find a new partner to animate the second season.

Now to be clear, there were some delays in the production of the first season, but they got it done and it was shown in many international territories by fall 2008.

So to me it's not that the future is an absolute question mark right now like Spectacular, they just need to get all the logistics set up to start moving it forward.

As I recall there were also animation production issues for the 1990's show as well.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, the disadvantage of animating overseas is that stuff can always happen that is beyond their control. Yeah, some episodes of the 90's series weren't produced in time. Granted, the 90's X-Men show, beyond about 10 episodes, used AKOM, which was all but literally the cheapest animation house at the time. WOLVERINE AND THE X-MEN is more than a few pay grades above that.

Season 2 may be a bit late, but it's definitely coming. I really don't have any fears about not getting more W&TXM at all. The show was renewed before it even aired in North America, for heaven's sakes.

Still, having Kyle start to wear more hats at Marvel could also be a factor.
 
I really don't want Craig Kyle near anything Thor related. The straight to DVD features have proven that Kyle doesn't really understand Thor very well (less than 5 minutes of screen time in the two Ultimate Avenger DTVs, given the slacker dead beat dad/false hero treatment, and reduced to a pathetic punching bag in Hulk Vs.). Same goes for his pal Chris Yost.
 
I want to see Cyclops become the leader again. I mean, now that Jean's back, what's he got to mope about? Nothing, that's who!
 
I want to see Cyclops become the leader again. I mean, now that Jean's back, what's he got to mope about? Nothing, that's who!
That would probably require changing the title to "Cyclops & The X-Men" or just plain "X-Men" and I don't see the powers that be being willing to do that.

Anyhow, I wouldn't mind seeing this -

01ColossusPawningGambit.jpg

I'm not a Gambit hater by any means, but you have to admit Colossus beating up Gambit would be funny.

And no, I didn't draw that. My good friend Jayzl Homavazir drew that. You can see his work here: http://www.jazylh.deviantart.com/ (yes he does commissions).
 
That would probably require changing the title to "Cyclops & The X-Men" or just plain "X-Men" and I don't see the powers that be being willing to do that.
Good point, but now that Wolverine has proven himself to be a capable leader, he would still be in the forefront of the show even if Cyclops gets more to do.
 
,
That would probably require changing the title to "Cyclops & The X-Men" or just plain "X-Men" and I don't see the powers that be being willing to do that.

Anyhow, I wouldn't mind seeing this -

01ColossusPawningGambit.jpg

I'm not a Gambit hater by any means, but you have to admit Colossus beating up Gambit would be funny.

And no, I didn't draw that. My good friend Jayzl Homavazir drew that. You can see his work here: http://www.jazylh.deviantart.com/ (yes he does commissions).

Hahahaahaha. Remy probably asked for it, bless him! Your friend does really good work!

Season 2 in 2011??!?!?!?! (in a Darth Vader voice....) NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!
:eek:
 
I really don't want Craig Kyle near anything Thor related. The straight to DVD features have proven that Kyle doesn't really understand Thor very well (less than 5 minutes of screen time in the two Ultimate Avenger DTVs, given the slacker dead beat dad/false hero treatment, and reduced to a pathetic punching bag in Hulk Vs.). Same goes for his pal Chris Yost.

I liked "HULK VS. THOR" overall. It had more of an actual story than "HULK VS. WOLVERINE", which was essentially an extended series of fights structured around a retelling of Weapon X (albeit one of the more faithful ones in terms of graphic violence). "HULK VS. THOR" was a story about Asgard, Thor, and Banner. Thor kind of "had" to lose to Hulk in order for the story to work out the way it was written, and the point of it was that he couldn't overcome every threat Asgard faced easily. I will admit that Thor did seem to take way more of a beating than he gave out against the Hulk in "VS. THOR", and the impression when you watch both is, "Wolverine can fight Hulk to a draw, but Thor can't" and I don't care how many commentaries tell me that the Hulk in "VS. THOR" was essentially the strongest Hulk possible since he was without Banner, that is still the impression.

(I hate DRAGON BALL Z examples, but the theory of the writers is Wolverine was fighting Hulk at Super Saiyen 1, and held that to a draw, while Thor was taking on Super Saiyen 4, and got wrecked; the theory being that Thor faced, essentially, the Hulk at full power while Logan only faced default Hulk. And to be fair, Thor delivered enough punishment that he was able to literally zap Loki's control of the Hulk out of the green man. But, yeah, that is the impression.)

As for "NEXT AVENGERS", Torun (Thor's daughter in that) came the closest to being an interesting kid in that (they all were stock cliches of children of heroes that any one of us could have come up with; "Cap's son would be the leader with a shield, Pym's son would be a nerd," so on). She would have made a far more interesting leader for the kids and I do agree Thor came off at least as callous as he often yelled at Odin for being for abandoning her for so long. It might have made more sense to have not had Hulk in that film at all, as he comes in somewhat by obligation by the final third of the film, and instead had Thor there for the big battle against Ultron. But, Hulk sells more DVD's, it seems.

The writing team behind the Marvel/Lion's Gate DTV's is solid overall, but they seem stronger when adapting a story already written by another writer. When tasked to come up with stuff on their own, they're hit or miss.

I want to see Cyclops become the leader again. I mean, now that Jean's back, what's he got to mope about? Nothing, that's who!

I doubt that is happening. Wolverine's in the title and he's expected to be the leader still. In the show's terms, he reunited the X-Men and found Xavier. He managed to bypass his own biases to lead to the end of the Phoenix. Even Rogue loves him again. Cyclops, in contrast, falls apart without his woman and needs to be dragged kicking and screaming to his responsibilities without her. That's not a strong leadership quality. Xavier seems to clearly favor Logan's style over Cyclops. Heck, "Breakdown" gave the impression that Cyclops could NEVER cut it as an X-Man without Jean and was NEVER any kind of leader, even with her he wasn't the sturdiest guy. I suppose the angle of Cyclops being a teacher's pet who never reached his potential or showed any genuine initiative without needing to be coaxed, prodded, and hugged at every point appeals to some, but not others.

All hints to Season 2 seem to imply that the creative team wants to deal as heavily with the AGE OF APOCALYPSE story and to "bring that world" to the viewer. In that story, Cyclops was an enemy of Wolverine, who he fought with over Jean (and lost, since Jean hung around Logan/Weapon X there) as well as a follower of Mr. Sinister. Technically in the comic version, while Havok was a blind loyalist to Sinister and Apocalypse, Cyclops sought to undermine them from within, and ultimately joins Magneto's forces against Apocalypse. Such a position is way, way, WWAAYYY too nuanced for the "Wolverine is always right, even when he is wrong" philosophy of the show, so I expect a genuinely "Dark Cyclops" in Season 2 and then the main subplot is to either bring him around or fully redeem him, since Season 1 didn't quite nail that. I've occasionally argued that the writers might have an easier time of writing Cyclops as a sympathetic villain than they have as an unsympathetic anti-hero, so such a story could work if executed well.

That would probably require changing the title to "Cyclops & The X-Men" or just plain "X-Men" and I don't see the powers that be being willing to do that.

Anyhow, I wouldn't mind seeing this -

I'm not a Gambit hater by any means, but you have to admit Colossus beating up Gambit would be funny.

And no, I didn't draw that. My good friend Jayzl Homavazir drew that. You can see his work here: http://www.jazylh.deviantart.com/ (yes he does commissions).

That's good art.

I'm not looking for Colossus to beat up any of the X-Men, even if it would be nice for someone to upstage Wolverine in a fight for once. Probably the one thing I'd really like to see is a good, JLU worthy Juggernaut vs. Colossus fight. You'd think NOT having Colossus in a fight with Juggernaut would be a major disadvantage to whatever team of X-Men is facing him (unless Rogue can just instantly lay him out, which she has in the post-2000 era of X-cartoons). Juggernaut has looked like a puss in this show so far, so why not make that functional and give Colossus his first win in the 21st century in animation?

Heck, even the 90's show chose their Juggernaut episode to randomly have Colossus show up to help out, because he's stronger than Rogue. ;)

Of course, I also want to see the animated Fastball Special in Season 2. It is almost a travesty that Season 1 of a Wolverine centric show not only didn't have that (not even with Beast), but BLOB of all people gets to steal it! I call a foul. It's kind of like hearing Torun in "NEXT AVENGERS" saying, "Ultron, we would have words with thee!" in a cartoon years before ever hearing something like that from Thor in a cartoon. It sort of makes me want to throw the fanboy flag, demand a replay of the down.
 
I liked "HULK VS. THOR" overall. It had more of an actual story than "HULK VS. WOLVERINE", which was essentially an extended series of fights structured around a retelling of Weapon X (albeit one of the more faithful ones in terms of graphic violence). "HULK VS. THOR" was a story about Asgard, Thor, and Banner. Thor kind of "had" to lose to Hulk in order for the story to work out the way it was written, and the point of it was that he couldn't overcome every threat Asgard faced easily. I will admit that Thor did seem to take way more of a beating than he gave out against the Hulk in "VS. THOR", and the impression when you watch both is, "Wolverine can fight Hulk to a draw, but Thor can't" and I don't care how many commentaries tell me that the Hulk in "VS. THOR" was essentially the strongest Hulk possible since he was without Banner, that is still the impression.

(I hate DRAGON BALL Z examples, but the theory of the writers is Wolverine was fighting Hulk at Super Saiyen 1, and held that to a draw, while Thor was taking on Super Saiyen 4, and got wrecked; the theory being that Thor faced, essentially, the Hulk at full power while Logan only faced default Hulk. And to be fair, Thor delivered enough punishment that he was able to literally zap Loki's control of the Hulk out of the green man. But, yeah, that is the impression.)
Well, it's just there's a difference between a respectable beat down and just plain old humiliation, and Thor ended up on the humiliation side of the fence in Vs (like Batman getting beaten up by the thug who looked like Ray Charles in the cathedral near the end of the 1989 Batman - at least Bats had the excuse of having just survived a plane crash :cwink:). Thor only got in five or six hits in each fight and the rest was him being beaten to death (or near death) by Hulk. He doesn't even attempt a different strategy, he just stands there being pounded on; he gets up only to be knocked down again, less effective each time. Even in a society where a lot of pop culture entertainment preaches the 'never give up' philosophy, Thor just looked stupid & pathetic for not retreating or playing dead after being knocked through the mountain, buying time to think of some other strategy (there's nothing brave or heroic about letting yourself get beaten to a pulp). Some of Superman's fights in the DCAU had him being knocked around a little too easily (see inconsistent power level complaint), but even DCAU Superman never got beaten on as badly as this. The only excuse I could throw out for it is that Thor may have been feeling jet lagged from fighting off an army of miscreants all week before Hulk showed up, but that would still be a poor excuse.

And I was more hyped for the Thor segment, since Thor has gotten so little action in the realm of animation over the years while Wolverine is basically Marvel's money ****e (along with Spider-Man), and was hoping this would help wash out the bad taste of Next Avengers, where Thor got the 'Superman Returns' treatment. Now I'm not sure I should even be interested in that young Thor feature they're holding off releasing until next year.

Plus, you just know they'd NEVER subject Wolverine to such a drawn out & humiliating beat down, even if it was against Super Saiyen 4 Hulk (or whatever those Dragon Ball terms are - I never actually watched DBZ all the way through, though I know some of its voice actors were also involved with X-Men Evolution, Beast Wars & the 2002 He-Man series), just because Wolverine sells the most toys.

Sorry I hijacked the thread for a Thor rant.

As for "NEXT AVENGERS", Torun (Thor's daughter in that) came the closest to being an interesting kid in that (they all were stock cliches of children of heroes that any one of us could have come up with; "Cap's son would be the leader with a shield, Pym's son would be a nerd," so on). She would have made a far more interesting leader for the kids and I do agree Thor came off at least as callous as he often yelled at Odin for being for abandoning her for so long. It might have made more sense to have not had Hulk in that film at all, as he comes in somewhat by obligation by the final third of the film, and instead had Thor there for the big battle against Ultron. But, Hulk sells more DVD's, it seems.
I'll concede she was somewhat more interesting than the others (anyone else notice she was wearing Thor's costume form the Ultimates universe?), but it's still sad to think of all the money that was wasted on that DTV when it could have been used to make a DTV about Marvel's actual heroes (I'm still waiting for solo DTVs of Captain America & Daredevil). Too bad as well, NA gave Thor arguably his best voice actor in Michael Adamthwaite (who voiced Balder in Hulk Vs. - and also voiced Colossus in Evolution, what little dialogue he had there).

The writing team behind the Marvel/Lion's Gate DTV's is solid overall, but they seem stronger when adapting a story already written by another writer. When tasked to come up with stuff on their own, they're hit or miss.
Verily.

I doubt that is happening. Wolverine's in the title and he's expected to be the leader still. In the show's terms, he reunited the X-Men and found Xavier. He managed to bypass his own biases to lead to the end of the Phoenix. Even Rogue loves him again. Cyclops, in contrast, falls apart without his woman and needs to be dragged kicking and screaming to his responsibilities without her. That's not a strong leadership quality. Xavier seems to clearly favor Logan's style over Cyclops. Heck, "Breakdown" gave the impression that Cyclops could NEVER cut it as an X-Man without Jean and was NEVER any kind of leader, even with her he wasn't the sturdiest guy. I suppose the angle of Cyclops being a teacher's pet who never reached his potential or showed any genuine initiative without needing to be coaxed, prodded, and hugged at every point appeals to some, but not others.
Must... not... comment...

I suppose Cyclops could always mysteriously "disappear" during a mission & be given up for dead by the X-Men (since that seems to be how they roll in this version - unless the MIA member is Wolverine of course), then have him turn up to have been found & seduced/brainwashed by the villains. Wouldn't surprise me if they did that.

All hints to Season 2 seem to imply that the creative team wants to deal as heavily with the AGE OF APOCALYPSE story and to "bring that world" to the viewer. In that story, Cyclops was an enemy of Wolverine, who he fought with over Jean (and lost, since Jean hung around Logan/Weapon X there) as well as a follower of Mr. Sinister. Technically in the comic version, while Havok was a blind loyalist to Sinister and Apocalypse, Cyclops sought to undermine them from within, and ultimately joins Magneto's forces against Apocalypse. Such a position is way, way, WWAAYYY too nuanced for the "Wolverine is always right, even when he is wrong" philosophy of the show, so I expect a genuinely "Dark Cyclops" in Season 2 and then the main subplot is to either bring him around or fully redeem him, since Season 1 didn't quite nail that. I've occasionally argued that the writers might have an easier time of writing Cyclops as a sympathetic villain than they have as an unsympathetic anti-hero, so such a story could work if executed well.
If they did allow the AoA Cyclops (playfully known as Bizarro Cyclops in some regions) that little bit of nuance, that would actually make him more heroic than regular Cyclops. Which would be sad yet funny at the same time.

That's good art.
I'll let him know you approve. :cwink:

Well if there's one thing it seems we can all agree on, it's wanting Colossus to have one really good knock down drag out fight with Juggernaut (or some other similarly large tanker type villain).
 
Well, it's just there's a difference between a respectable beat down and just plain old humiliation, and Thor ended up on the humiliation side of the fence in Vs (like Batman getting beaten up by the thug who looked like Ray Charles in the cathedral near the end of the 1989 Batman - at least Bats had the excuse of having just survived a plane crash :cwink:). Thor only got in five or six hits in each fight and the rest was him being beaten to death (or near death) by Hulk. He doesn't even attempt a different strategy, he just stands there being pounded on; he gets up only to be knocked down again, less effective each time. Even in a society where a lot of pop culture entertainment preaches the 'never give up' philosophy, Thor just looked stupid & pathetic for not retreating or playing dead after being knocked through the mountain, buying time to think of some other strategy (there's nothing brave or heroic about letting yourself get beaten to a pulp). Some of Superman's fights in the DCAU had him being knocked around a little too easily (see inconsistent power level complaint), but even DCAU Superman never got beaten on as badly as this. The only excuse I could throw out for it is that Thor may have been feeling jet lagged from fighting off an army of miscreants all week before Hulk showed up, but that would still be a poor excuse.

And I was more hyped for the Thor segment, since Thor has gotten so little action in the realm of animation over the years while Wolverine is basically Marvel's money ****e (along with Spider-Man), and was hoping this would help wash out the bad taste of Next Avengers, where Thor got the 'Superman Returns' treatment. Now I'm not sure I should even be interested in that young Thor feature they're holding off releasing until next year.

Plus, you just know they'd NEVER subject Wolverine to such a drawn out & humiliating beat down, even if it was against Super Saiyen 4 Hulk (or whatever those Dragon Ball terms are - I never actually watched DBZ all the way through, though I know some of its voice actors were also involved with X-Men Evolution, Beast Wars & the 2002 He-Man series), just because Wolverine sells the most toys.

Sorry I hijacked the thread for a Thor rant.

S'okay. I hijack threads for rants all the time. ;)

To play Devil's Advocate for a moment, Wolverine has had his share of downright ludicrous or humiliating defeats in his animated library.

- Thrown into a wall and getting stuck ("A Firestar is Born", Season 2 SPIDER-MAN AND HIS AMAZING FRIENDS). His first animated appearance, actually.
- Passing out from being BURPED UPON (Season 2, 90's X-MEN series)
- Having Blob fall atop him (Season 1, X-MEN EVOLUTION)
- Having a teenage girl kick him in the shin (Season 2, X-MEN EVOLUTION)

Superman had some downright lousy defeats in the first season of Justice League. A school girl with a grenade could have dropped him that season.

In comparison to all that, being beaten into a coma by the Hulk in his most berserk state isn't THAT bad. But, on the other hand of course, Wolverine has MANY more animated showing than Thor and many more animated victories under his belt. I do see your point. In HULK VS. THOR, Thor seemed to act as if he had never faced an opponent who survived one of his hammer blows before and after Hulk would get up from an attack, Thor would usually just take it. It could have been paced and storyboarded better to seem more evenly matched. The bits where Thor is at the brink of death, though, and cool, and the overall story of that short was actually rather solid, for a Thor adventure.

I do agree that it could have been handled better. But, Thor'll be a regular in AVENGERS: EARTH'S MIGHTIEST HEROES with Chris Yost solo, so who knows. Not to mention THOR: TALES OF ASGARD might not suck.

Panthro said:
I'll concede she was somewhat more interesting than the others (anyone else notice she was wearing Thor's costume form the Ultimates universe?), but it's still sad to think of all the money that was wasted on that DTV when it could have been used to make a DTV about Marvel's actual heroes (I'm still waiting for solo DTVs of Captain America & Daredevil). Too bad as well, NA gave Thor arguably his best voice actor in Michael Adamthwaite (who voiced Balder in Hulk Vs. - and also voiced Colossus in Evolution, what little dialogue he had there).

Adamthwaite also voiced Namor in two episodes of FANTASTIC FOUR: WORLD'S GREATEST HEROES from 2006, and played the male lead in "SWORD OF THE STRANGER", an anime film from 2007 that was just dubbed by Bandai. He's a fine actor from Canada's Ocean Group when given enough lines to work with.

I wasn't overly thrilled with "NEXT AVENGERS" either; there were other ways to make an animated feature for kids than that. The kid characters should have had a bit more originality; they were very stock. That said, Ultron was cool there, at least.

However, at the "PLANET HULK" screening on 1/14 in NYC, Joe Quesada himself said he'd like to see an animated Captain America DTV from Lion's Gate; telling his death story, basically. Considering that DC released "SUPERMAN: DOOMSDAY" as the first of their generation of DTV animated films, that's hardly a bad idea. Josh Fine would love to make a Blade animated DTV. Marvel & Lion's Gate will be discussing their next 8 or so animated specials soon so everything is on the table. But...yeah. Joe Quesada himself said he'd like an animated Captain America DTV. :up:

Panthro said:
Must... not... comment...

I suppose Cyclops could always mysteriously "disappear" during a mission & be given up for dead by the X-Men (since that seems to be how they roll in this version - unless the MIA member is Wolverine of course), then have him turn up to have been found & seduced/brainwashed by the villains. Wouldn't surprise me if they did that.

If they did allow the AoA Cyclops (playfully known as Bizarro Cyclops in some regions) that little bit of nuance, that would actually make him more heroic than regular Cyclops. Which would be sad yet funny at the same time.

That's possible. It also is possible that Jean starts to develop feelings for Wolverine, which drives Cyclops over the edge and towards Sinister to try to revive Frost. The writers usually are fans of more "traditional" subplots, and it has been a long time before a cartoon has done that whole triangle. The 90's show did it to an extent, but Jean was firmly with Scott and there was little tension that would actually change long term. In AGE OF APOCALYPSE, Jean is with Logan/Weapon X long term (some people joke that Jean ends up with Logan in nearly every alternate reality). For every person tired of that triangle, there is another who misses it in X-Fandom.

And, to play Devil's Advocate, if Cyclops is going to go off the deep end worse in Season 2 than he did in 1, having it be because Jean is starting to love the person that Cyclops literally blames for all the turmoil he ever had in his life, that's a fairly good reason to go a bit nuts. "Breakdown", while it was interupted by the Phoenix, seemed to reveal that Cyclops seemed to blame Wolverine for his current troubles and for messing up the cosy lifestyle he had with the X-Men. Wolverine wouldn't have to return Jean's affections for this effect to probably happen.

Of course, Jean's could be turned off that Cyclops was so morbidly obsessed with her while she was missing. In the comics, Jean used to TK blast Cyclops if he even so much as looked at Psylocke, so one can imagine what would happen if Scott ever missed Frost. Women like being loved, but to the point that their man stops shaving, stops caring about anything, all but commits suicide over losing them? Granted, I was never the biggest fan of Jean, so I'm biased.

It is possible that Season 2's arc, at least one of them, will be seeing a "Dark Cyclops" and then trying to redeem him, with AGE OF APOCALYPSE either showing what happens if that doesn't happen or providing the key to preventing it, much as Future Logan basically led to ending the Phoenix threat in the present; by knowing what went wrong in the "past".

As "Breakdown" seemed to hint, the issue wasn't Cyclops being demoted; it seemed, at least in his mind, that he could never really cut it. He was never the leader of the X-Men and was only competent after Jean came along, and then Logan showed up and started to distract her. In Scott's defense, Logan respected no boundaries over their relationship and flirted with her in Scott's face, which would irritate even the strictest boy-scout. Season 1 reunited Scott with Jean but it didn't really resolve his personal quest for redemption. If anything, it proved Scott right to be so morbidly obsessed. That's annoying for Season 1, but if Season 2 wants to resolve that in a more dynamic and dramatic way, we could be due for what TV Tropes call a "Crowning Moment of Awesome". In Apocalypse's first appearances in X-FACTOR, Cyclops blasted the living spit out of him in one splash page at the end of some arcs. So, who knows. So long as something is executed well, I'm open.

Panthro said:
I'll let him know you approve. :cwink:

Well if there's one thing it seems we can all agree on, it's wanting Colossus to have one really good knock down drag out fight with Juggernaut (or some other similarly large tanker type villain).

At least one. The last time Colossus and Juggernaut locked up was in 1993-1994. The show did itself no favors making Juggernaut look like a flop in his first appearance, but I guess they didn't want to "waste" a whole episode establishing Juggernaut as unbeatable save for his weakness, as the prior two X-Men cartoons did. Of course, WITHOUT that, he looked weaker than the Rhino (who, in SPECTACULAR SPIDER-MAN came off as damn near unstoppable his first episode in costume), but I digress. It could be very cool. The 90's show had no animation budget, and this show has one. Various X-Men have distinct and/or imposing and unique methods of doing things. Wolverine slicing an X into a wall and kicking it down, as some demonstrate, is cool enough for an avatar. Nightcrawler teleports with his trademark smoke, Cyclops shoots his blasts and so on. Colossus, though, turns to steel and smashes stuff, and that should look imposing regardless of who or what he is fighting. That doesn't mean he always has to win; but that he shouldn't ever look weak.
 
I can tell that Dread is a Jean/Logan shipper since he desperately wants them to get together.
 
I can tell that Dread is a Jean/Logan shipper since he desperately wants them to get together.

Not especially. That would require that I actually liked Jean as a character, and I just never have been able to. She always comes off as a generic heroine who has what I call, "cosmic bird themed PMS" and it seems very hard for writers on TV and in comics to pen her much differently. Her dilemma, as I have theorized before, was she spent much of her existence from 1963-1970 as the "token girl" of the X-Men, who basically just acted like any "token girl" would on a superhero team at the time. Polaris joined the original team by the end and that could have led to development for both, but the original run of the series ended quickly (and for a while, Polaris was just known as Havok's occasionally insane/possessed girlfriend anyway).

I mean, in W&TXM, Jean herself was really nothing but a plot point. She was someone to give Cyclops someone to obsess over and fall apart over. Even in flashbacks she seemed to exist to either create tension between Scott and Logan, or to make Scott stable. While Jean was fairly generic in the 1990's X-Men series, in W&TXM she wasn't even that; she was a walking plot device, practically.

I love Jeff Parker run of X-MEN FIRST CLASS, but even with him it was hard to tell whether Jean was acting like herself or how most typical girls on a team would. He did try valiantly, though. It would have been fun if Parker had a few issues with Alex and Lorna officially on the X-Men with the founders, which would have made sense, but I digress.

It's not that I have anything against Jean, although I have to admit being weary for the Phoenix plot line. I just don't care for her.

If it seems shallow that in Season 2 I think it'd be interesting for her to gravitate towards Logan to give Cyclops a good reason for "going bad" and then having a more definite redemption arc, I'd argue that it's no more shallow than how she was written in season 1.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"